| Literature DB >> 26977407 |
Jesus Eric Piña-Garza1, Steve Chung2, Georgia D Montouris3, Rodney A Radtke4, Trevor Resnick5, Robert T Wechsler6.
Abstract
The variable presentation and progression of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) can make it difficult to recognize, particularly in adults. To improve diagnosis, a retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who were diagnosed as adults and/or were followed for several years after diagnosis. We present 5 cases that illustrate changes in LGS features over time. Cases 1 and 2 were diagnosed by age 8 with intractable seizures, developmental delay, and abnormal EEGs with 1.5-2 Hz SSW discharges. However, seizure type and frequency changed over time for both patients, and the incidence of SSW discharges decreased. Cases 3, 4, and 5 were diagnosed with LGS as adults based on current and past features and symptoms, including treatment-resistant seizures, cognitive and motor impairment, and abnormal EEG findings. While incomplete, their records indicate that an earlier LGS diagnosis may have been missed or lost to history. These cases demonstrate the need to thoroughly and continuously evaluate all aspects of a patient's encephalopathy, bearing in mind the potential for LGS features to change over time.Entities:
Keywords: Adult; Diagnosis; EEG, electroencephalogram; Features; LGS; LGS, Lennox–Gastaut syndrome; Lennox–Gastaut syndrome; SSW, slow spike–wave discharge; SW, spike–wave discharge; Symptoms
Year: 2016 PMID: 26977407 PMCID: PMC4782006 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebcr.2016.01.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsy Behav Case Rep ISSN: 2213-3232
Summary of LGS features over time in case series.
ACTH indicates adrenocorticotropic hormone; BA, background activity; CI; cognitive impairment; DD, developmental delay; DR, developmental regression; F, female; FL, frontal lobectomy; F/U, follow-up; HP, hemiparesis; IU, intrauterine; M, male; mo, months; NA, information not available; None, the symptom or feature was not present; OFR, orbital frontal resection; SSW, slow spike–wave discharges; SW, spike–wave discharges; VI, visual impairment; wks, weeks; and yr, year(s).
aSeizure types: A = atonic; AA = atypical absence; CP = complex partial; FM = focal motor; IS = infantile spasms; M = myoclonic; P = partial; PMF = partial multifocal; SI = startle-induced; T = tonic; TC = tonic–clonic.
bSudden unexpected death occurred at age 12.
cSeizures occurred when patient discontinued seizure treatment due to acute depression.
Fig. 1Panel A. Case 1, age 8. EEG at LGS diagnosis, showing generalized 1.5–2 Hz SSW discharges with frontal predominance, intermittent spike–waves predominating in the left occipital region, and poorly formed posterior rhythm.
Panel B. Case 1, age 12. EEG 4 years after diagnosis, showing low-amplitude background activity with infrequent low-amplitude generalized discharges and infrequent multifocal sharp waves.
Fig. 2Panel A. Case 3, age 19. EEG at presentation and diagnosis, showing high-amplitude slowing with irregular high-amplitude generalized SW discharges.
Panel B. Case 3, age 12. EEG 7 years before diagnosis, showing generalized ≤ 1 Hz SSW discharges.
Panel C. Case 3, age 25. EEG 6 years after diagnosis, showing bursts of high-amplitude background slowing.
Fig. 3Case 5, age 32. EEG at presentation and diagnosis, showing irregular posterior dominant 4–7 Hz rhythm and bursts of atypical 2–3 Hz SW complexes.