Literature DB >> 26977355

Assessing the imaging performance of light sheet microscopies in highly scattering tissues.

A K Glaser1, Y Wang1, J T C Liu1.   

Abstract

Light sheet microscopy (LSM) has emerged as an optical-imaging method for high spatiotemporal volumetric imaging of relatively transparent samples. While this capability has allowed the technique to be highly impactful in fields such as developmental biology, applications involving highly scattering thick tissues have been largely unexplored. Herein, we employ Monte Carlo simulations to explore the use of LSM for imaging turbid media. In particular, due to its similarity to dual-axis confocal (DAC) microscopy, we compare LSM performance to point-scanned (PS-DAC) and line-scanned (LS-DAC) dual-axis confocal microscopy techniques that have been previously shown to produce high-quality images at round-trip optical lengths of ~9 - 10 and ~3 - 4 respectively. The results of this study indicate that LSM using widefield collection (WF-LSM) provides comparable performance to LS-DAC in thick tissues, due to the fact that they both utilize an illumination beam focused in one dimension (i.e. a line or sheet). On the other hand, LSM using confocal line detection (CL-LSM) is more analogous to PS-DAC microscopy, in which the illumination beam is focused in two dimensions to a point. The imaging depth of LSM is only slightly inferior to DAC (~2 - 3 and ~6 - 7 optical lengths for WF-LSM and CL-LSM respectively) due to the use of a lower numerical aperture (NA) illumination beam for extended imaging along the illumination axis. Therefore, we conclude that the ability to image deeply is dictated most by the confocality of the microscope technique. In addition, we find that imaging resolution is mostly dependent on the collection NA, and is relatively invariant to imaging depth in a homogeneous scattering medium. Our results indicate that superficial imaging of highly scattering tissues using light sheet microscopy is possible.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (110.0113) Imaging through turbid media; (170.1790) Confocal microscopy; (170.2520) Fluorescence microscopy; (170.3880) Medical and biological imaging; (170.5810) Scanning microscopy

Year:  2016        PMID: 26977355      PMCID: PMC4771464          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.7.000454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  48 in total

1.  Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Jan Huisken; Jim Swoger; Filippo Del Bene; Joachim Wittbrodt; Ernst H K Stelzer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Propagation stability of self-reconstructing Bessel beams enables contrast-enhanced imaging in thick media.

Authors:  Florian O Fahrbach; Alexander Rohrbach
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Resolution enhancement in a light-sheet-based microscope (SPIM).

Authors:  Christoph J Engelbrecht; Ernst H Stelzer
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Optimizing the performance of dual-axis confocal microscopes via Monte-Carlo scattering simulations and diffraction theory.

Authors:  Ye Chen; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Open-top selective plane illumination microscope for conventionally mounted specimens.

Authors:  Ryan McGorty; Harrison Liu; Daichi Kamiyama; Zhiqiang Dong; Su Guo; Bo Huang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Computation of tightly-focused laser beams in the FDTD method.

Authors:  Ilker R Capoğlu; Allen Taflove; Vadim Backman
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Coupled forward-adjoint Monte Carlo simulation of spatial-angular light fields to determine optical sensitivity in turbid media.

Authors:  Adam R Gardner; Carole K Hayakawa; Vasan Venugopalan
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Dodt; Ulrich Leischner; Anja Schierloh; Nina Jährling; Christoph Peter Mauch; Katrin Deininger; Jan Michael Deussing; Matthias Eder; Walter Zieglgänsberger; Klaus Becker
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Fast, high-contrast imaging of animal development with scanned light sheet-based structured-illumination microscopy.

Authors:  Philipp J Keller; Annette D Schmidt; Anthony Santella; Khaled Khairy; Zhirong Bao; Joachim Wittbrodt; Ernst H K Stelzer
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  9 in total

1.  Scattering oblique plane microscopy for in-vivo blood cell imaging.

Authors:  Gregory N McKay; Ryan C Niemeier; Carlos Castro-González; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Performance tradeoffs for single- and dual-objective open-top light-sheet microscope designs: a simulation-based analysis.

Authors:  Kevin W Bishop; Adam K Glaser; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Fractal propagation method enables realistic optical microscopy simulations in biological tissues.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Ye Chen; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Optica       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 11.104

4.  Scattering-Based Light-Sheet Microscopy for Rapid Cellular Imaging of Fresh Tissue.

Authors:  Christopher D Nguyen; Patrick K O'Neal; Nachiket Kulkarni; Eric Yang; Dongkyun Kang
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2020-12-01

5.  Enhancement of image quality and imaging depth with Airy light-sheet microscopy in cleared and non-cleared neural tissue.

Authors:  Jonathan Nylk; Kaley McCluskey; Sanya Aggarwal; Javier A Tello; Kishan Dholakia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Label-free in vivo pathology of human epithelia with a high-speed handheld dual-axis confocal microscope.

Authors:  Chengbo Yin; Linpeng Wei; Sanjee Abeytunge; Gary Peterson; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Jonathan Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Rapid tissue histology using multichannel confocal fluorescence microscopy with focus tracking.

Authors:  Juehyung Kang; Incheon Song; Hongrae Kim; Hyunjin Kim; Sunhye Lee; Yongdoo Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Kyung Sohn; Hongki Yoo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-10

Review 8.  Multiplexed Optical Imaging of Tumor-Directed Nanoparticles: A Review of Imaging Systems and Approaches.

Authors:  Yu Winston Wang; Nicholas P Reder; Soyoung Kang; Adam K Glaser; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2017-08-19

9.  Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens.

Authors:  Adam K Glaser; Nicholas P Reder; Ye Chen; Erin F McCarty; Chengbo Yin; Linpeng Wei; Yu Wang; Lawrence D True; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 25.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.