Justin T Jordan1, David Mayans2, Logan Schneider2, Nellie Adams2, Ayaz M Khawaja2, John Engstrom2. 1. From the Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (J.T.J.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Neurology Consultants of Kansas (D.M.), Wichita; Department of Neurology (L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; American Academy of Neurology Staff (N.A.), Minneapolis, MN; Department of Neurology (A.M.K.), University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham; and Department of Neurology (J.E.), University of California-San Francisco. jtjordan@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. From the Pappas Center for Neuro-Oncology (J.T.J.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Neurology Consultants of Kansas (D.M.), Wichita; Department of Neurology (L.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; American Academy of Neurology Staff (N.A.), Minneapolis, MN; Department of Neurology (A.M.K.), University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham; and Department of Neurology (J.E.), University of California-San Francisco.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To survey US-trained graduating neurology residents who are American Academy of Neurology members, in an effort to trend perceived quality and completeness of graduate neurology education. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all American Academy of Neurology members graduating from US neurology residency programs in the Spring of 2014. RESULTS: Of 805 eligible respondents, 24% completed the survey. Ninety-three percent of adult neurology residents and 56% of child neurology residents reported plans to pursue fellowship training after residency. Respondents reported a desire for additional training in neurocritical care, neuro-oncology, neuromuscular diseases, botulinum toxin injection, and nerve blocks. There remains a clear deficit in business training of neurology residents, although there was notable improvement in knowledge of coding and office management compared to previous surveys. DISCUSSION: Although there are still areas of perceived weakness in neurology training, graduating neurology residents feel generally well prepared for their chosen careers. However, most still pursue fellowship training for reasons that are little understood. In addition to certain subspecialties and procedures, practice management remains deficient in neurology training and is a point of future insecurity for most residents. Future curriculum changes should consider resident-reported gaps in knowledge, with careful consideration of improving business training.
OBJECTIVE: To survey US-trained graduating neurology residents who are American Academy of Neurology members, in an effort to trend perceived quality and completeness of graduate neurology education. METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to all American Academy of Neurology members graduating from US neurology residency programs in the Spring of 2014. RESULTS: Of 805 eligible respondents, 24% completed the survey. Ninety-three percent of adult neurology residents and 56% of child neurology residents reported plans to pursue fellowship training after residency. Respondents reported a desire for additional training in neurocritical care, neuro-oncology, neuromuscular diseases, botulinum toxin injection, and nerve blocks. There remains a clear deficit in business training of neurology residents, although there was notable improvement in knowledge of coding and office management compared to previous surveys. DISCUSSION: Although there are still areas of perceived weakness in neurology training, graduating neurology residents feel generally well prepared for their chosen careers. However, most still pursue fellowship training for reasons that are little understood. In addition to certain subspecialties and procedures, practice management remains deficient in neurology training and is a point of future insecurity for most residents. Future curriculum changes should consider resident-reported gaps in knowledge, with careful consideration of improving business training.
Authors: Jeremy A Tanner; Karthik T Rao; Rachel E Salas; Roy E Strowd; Angeline M Nguyen; Alexandra Kornbluh; Evan Mead-Brewer; Charlene E Gamaldo Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2017-12
Authors: N N Kleineberg; M van der Meulen; C Franke; L Klingelhoefer; A Sauerbier; G Di Liberto; V Carvalho; H W Berendse; G Deuschl Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 6.089