Literature DB >> 26976010

Physical properties of particulate matter from animal houses-empirical studies to improve emission modelling.

Ehab Mostafa1,2, Christoph Nannen3, Jessica Henseler3, Bernd Diekmann4, Richard Gates5, Wolfgang Buescher3.   

Abstract

Maintaining and preserving the environment from pollutants are of utmost importance. Particulate matter (PM) is considered one of the main air pollutants. In addition to the harmful effects of PM in the environment, it has also a negative indoor impact on human and animal health. The specific forms of damage of particulate emission from livestock buildings depend on its physical properties. The physical properties of particulates from livestock facilities are largely unknown. Most studies assume the livestock particles to be spherical with a constant density which can result in biased estimations, leading to inaccurate results and errors in the calculation of particle mass concentration in livestock buildings. The physical properties of PM, including difference in density as a function of particle size and shape, can have a significant impact on the predictions of particles' behaviour. The aim of this research was to characterize the physical properties of PM from different animal houses and consequently determine PM mass concentration. The mean densities of collected PM from laying hens, dairy cows and pig barns were 1450, 1520 and 2030 kg m(-3), respectively, whilst the mass factors were 2.17 × 10(-3), 2.18 × 10(-3) and 5.36 × 10(-3) μm, respectively. The highest mass concentration was observed in pig barns generally followed by laying hen barns, and the lowest concentration was in dairy cow buildings. Results are presented in such a way that they can be used in subsequent research for simulation purposes and to form the basis for a data set of PM physical properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Livestock buildings; Mass concentration; Mass factor; Particle density; Particulate matter; Shape factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26976010     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6424-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  9 in total

Review 1.  Dust in pig buildings.

Authors:  S Pedersen; M Nonnenmann; R Rautiainen; T G Demmers; T Banhazi; M Lyngbye
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2000-11

2.  Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers.

Authors:  K Radon; C Weber; M Iversen; B Danuser; S Pedersen; D Nowak
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Austrian children living on a farm have less hay fever, asthma and allergic sensitization.

Authors:  J Riedler; W Eder; G Oberfeld; M Schreuer
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.018

4.  Average protein density is a molecular-weight-dependent function.

Authors:  Hannes Fischer; Igor Polikarpov; Aldo F Craievich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Evaluation of workers' exposure to dust, ammonia and endotoxin in poultry industries at the province of Isfahan, Iran.

Authors:  F Golbabaei; F Islami
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.179

Review 6.  Human health effects of dust exposure in animal confinement buildings.

Authors:  M Iversen; S Kirychuk; H Drost; L Jacobson
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2000-11

7.  Effects of tumor promoters on the rate and commitment to terminal differentiation of subpopulations of murine keratinocytes.

Authors:  J J Reiners; T J Slaga
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Respiratory function in poultry workers and pharmacologic characterization of poultry dust extract.

Authors:  E Zuskin; J Mustajbegovic; E N Schachter; J Kern; N Rienzi; S Goswami; Z Marom; S Maayani
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Asthma and farm exposures in a cohort of rural Iowa children.

Authors:  James A Merchant; Allison L Naleway; Erik R Svendsen; Kevin M Kelly; Leon F Burmeister; Ann M Stromquist; Craig D Taylor; Peter S Thorne; Stephen J Reynolds; Wayne T Sanderson; Elizabeth A Chrischilles
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Pig barns ammonia and greenhouse gas emission mitigation by slurry aeration and acid scrubber.

Authors:  Ehab Mostafa; Anne Selders; Richard S Gates; Wolfgang Buescher
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.