Literature DB >> 26975942

Defining Advanced Heart Failure: A Systematic Review of Criteria Used in Clinical Trials.

Jonathan B Bjork1, Kristina K Alton1, Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou1, Javed Butler2, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enrollment criteria used in advanced heart failure (HF) clinical trials might identify a common set of widely accepted quantitative characteristics as the basis of a consensus definition for advanced HF, which is currently lacking.
METHODS: We reviewed all clinical trials investigating interventions in patients with advanced HF as of July 31, 2015. Eligible publications (N = 134) reported original data from clinical trials explicitly defining advanced HF in adults.
RESULTS: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was the most common criterion (119 trials, 88.8%; classes ranged from II to IV), followed by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (84 trials, 62.7%; cutoff range, 20% to 45%; mode 35%). Other criteria included inotrope-dependent status (12.7%), peak oxygen consumption (10.4%), ≥1 previous HF admissions (10.4%), cardiac index (10.4%), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (9.0%), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (6.0%), and transplant listing status (5.2%). Cutoff points for quantitative criteria varied considerably. Previous HF admission was more frequently required in recent trials (P = .007 for temporal trend), whereas use of hemodynamic criteria decreased over time (P = .050 for temporal trend). Average LVEF among participants increased over time.
CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in the definition of advanced HF for clinical trial purposes. Beyond NYHA and LVEF, a wide array of criteria has been used, with little consistency both in criteria selection and quantitative cutoff points.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; advanced heart failure; clinical trials; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975942     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2016.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  6 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Stage D Heart Failure: Data From the Most Recent Registries.

Authors:  Thomas M Cascino; Keith D Aaronson; Garrick C Stewart
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-10

Review 2.  Levosimendan in Acute and Advanced Heart Failure: an Expert Perspective on Posology and Therapeutic Application.

Authors:  S Bouchez; F Fedele; G Giannakoulas; F Gustafsson; V-P Harjola; K Karason; M Kivikko; D von Lewinski; F Oliva; Z Papp; J Parissis; Piero Pollesello; G Pölzl; C Tschöpe
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  Focusing on Referral Rather than Selection for Advanced Heart Failure Therapies.

Authors:  Tonje Thorvaldsen; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Card Fail Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Living with advanced heart failure: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Caterina Checa; Laura Medina-Perucha; Miguel-Ángel Muñoz; José María Verdú-Rotellar; Anna Berenguera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Reviewing the Modern Therapeutical Options and the Outcomes of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Diana-Carina Iovanovici; Simona Gabriela Bungau; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Madalina Moisi; Elena Emilia Babes; Delia Mirela Tit; Tunde Horvath; Tapan Behl; Marius Rus
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

6.  Clinical findings and survival time in dogs with advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Amelie Beaumier; John E Rush; Vicky K Yang; Lisa M Freeman
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.