Literature DB >> 26975900

Pattern of and reason for postoperative residual disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following upfront radical debulking surgery.

Florian Heitz1, Philipp Harter2, Piero F Alesina3, Martin K Walz3, Dietmar Lorenz4, Harald Groeben5, Sebastian Heikaus6, Anette Fisseler-Eckhoff7, Stephanie Schneider8, Beyhan Ataseven8, Christian Kurzeder8, Sonia Prader8, Bianca Beutel9, Alexander Traut2, Andreas du Bois2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Describing the pattern of and reasons for post-operative tumor residuals in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AOC) operated in a specialized gynecologic cancer center following a strategy of maximum upfront debulking followed by systemic chemotherapy.
METHODS: All consecutive AOC-patients treated between 2005 and 2015 due to stages FIGO IIIB/IV were included in this single-center analysis.
RESULTS: 739 patients were included in this analysis. In 81 (11.0%) patients, chemotherapy had already started before referral. Of the remaining 658 patients, upfront debulking was indicated in 578 patients (87.8%), while 80 patients (12.8%) were classified ineligible for upfront debulking; mostly due to comorbidities. A complete tumor resection was achieved in 66.1% of the 578 patients with upfront surgery, 25.4% had residuals 1-10mm and 8.5% had residuals exceeding 10mm, and 12.5% of patients had multifocal residual disease. Most common localization was small bowel mesentery and serosa (79.8%), porta hepatis/hepatoduodenal ligament (10.1%), liver parenchyma (4.3%), pancreas (8.0%), gastric serosa (3.2%), and tumor surrounding/infiltrating the truncus coeliacus (2.7%); 14.9% of the patients had non-resectable supra diaphragmatic lesions. Size of residual tumor was significantly associated with progression-free and overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Upfront debulking for AOC followed by systemic chemotherapy was our main treatment strategy in almost 90% of all patients. The majority experienced a benefit by this approach; while 11.7% of patients probably did not. Understanding sites and reason for residual disease may help to develop adequate surgical training programs but also to identify patients that would better benefit from alternative treatment strategies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced ovarian cancer; Complete resection; Pattern of residual disease; Prognosis; Upfront debulking surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975900     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cholecystectomy, porta hepatis stripping, and omental bursectomy.

Authors:  Joo-Hyuk Son; Suk-Joon Chang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

Review 2.  Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Federico Migliorelli; Marie Voglimacci; Justine Figurelli; Stephanie Motton; Yann Tanguy Le Gac; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09

Review 3.  Imaging spectrum of mesenteric masses.

Authors:  Radwan Diab; Mayur Virarkar; Mohammed Saleh; Sherif Elsheif; Sanaz Javadi; Priya Bhosale; Silvana Faria
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11

Review 4.  Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Bryant; Shaun Hiu; Patience T Kunonga; Ketankumar Gajjar; Dawn Craig; Luke Vale; Brett A Winter-Roach; Ahmed Elattar; Raj Naik
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-09-26

5.  RE: Pattern of and reason for postoperative residual disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following upfront radical debulking surgery.

Authors:  A Fagotti; G Vizzielli; M Petrillo; G Scambia
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-11-10

6.  Response to the letter of Fagotti et al. regarding the manuscript: "Pattern of and reason for postoperative residual disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer following upfront radical debulking surgery".

Authors:  Florian Heitz; Philipp Harter; Beyhan Ataseven; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-11-11

7.  Role of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery for optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer: Reappraisal in the era of radical surgery.

Authors:  Kyung Jin Eoh; Jung-Yun Lee; Jung Won Yoon; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Sang-Wun Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-06

8.  Cytoreduction (Peritonectomy Procedures) Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Retrospective Italian Multicenter Observational Study of 511 Cases.

Authors:  Angelo Di Giorgio; Pierandrea De Iaco; Michele De Simone; Alfredo Garofalo; Giovanni Scambia; Antonio Daniele Pinna; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Luca Ansaloni; Antonio Macrì; Paolo Cappellini; Valerio Ceriani; Giorgio Giorda; Daniele Biacchi; Marco Vaira; Mario Valle; Paolo Sammartino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  A predictive score for optimal cytoreduction at interval debulking surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer: a two- centers experience.

Authors:  Eleonora Ghisoni; Dionyssios Katsaros; Furio Maggiorotto; Massimo Aglietta; Marco Vaira; Michele De Simone; Gloria Mittica; Gaia Giannone; Manuela Robella; Sofia Genta; Fabiola Lucchino; Francesco Marocco; Fulvio Borella; Giorgio Valabrega; Riccardo Ponzone
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.234

10.  Cell-free tumor DNA, CA125 and HE4 for the objective assessment of tumor burden in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Florian Heitz; Sotirios Lakis; Philipp Harter; Sebastian Heikaus; Jalid Sehouli; Jatin Talwar; Roopika Menon; Beyhan Ataseven; Miriam Bertrand; Stephanie Schneider; Erika Mariotti; Mareike Bommert; Judith N Müller; Sonia Prader; Frauke Leenders; Alexandra Hengsbach; Christian Gloeckner; Elena Ioana Braicu; Lukas C Heukamp; Andreas du Bois; Johannes M Heuckmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.