Literature DB >> 26975599

Toward automated e-cigarette surveillance: Spotting e-cigarette proponents on Twitter.

Ramakanth Kavuluru1, A K M Sabbir2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes or e-cigs) are a popular emerging tobacco product. Because e-cigs do not generate toxic tobacco combustion products that result from smoking regular cigarettes, they are sometimes perceived and promoted as a less harmful alternative to smoking and also as means to quit smoking. However, the safety of e-cigs and their efficacy in supporting smoking cessation is yet to be determined. Importantly, the federal drug administration (FDA) currently does not regulate e-cigs and as such their manufacturing, marketing, and sale is not subject to the rules that apply to traditional cigarettes. A number of manufacturers, advocates, and e-cig users are actively promoting e-cigs on Twitter.
OBJECTIVE: We develop a high accuracy supervised predictive model to automatically identify e-cig "proponents" on Twitter and analyze the quantitative variation of their tweeting behavior along popular themes when compared with other Twitter users (or tweeters).
METHODS: Using a dataset of 1000 independently annotated Twitter profiles by two different annotators, we employed a variety of textual features from latest tweet content and tweeter profile biography to build predictive models to automatically identify proponent tweeters. We used a set of manually curated key phrases to analyze e-cig proponent tweets from a corpus of over one million e-cig tweets along well known e-cig themes and compared the results with those generated by regular tweeters.
RESULTS: Our model identifies e-cig proponents with 97% precision, 86% recall, 91% F-score, and 96% overall accuracy, with tight 95% confidence intervals. We find that as opposed to regular tweeters that form over 90% of the dataset, e-cig proponents are a much smaller subset but tweet two to five times more than regular tweeters. Proponents also disproportionately (one to two orders of magnitude more) highlight e-cig flavors, their smoke-free and potential harm reduction aspects, and their claimed use in smoking cessation.
CONCLUSIONS: Given FDA is currently in the process of proposing meaningful regulation, we believe our work demonstrates the strong potential of informatics approaches, specifically machine learning, for automated e-cig surveillance on Twitter.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic cigarettes; Text classification; Text mining

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975599      PMCID: PMC4893981          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  22 in total

1.  Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christopher Bullen; Colin Howe; Murray Laugesen; Hayden McRobbie; Varsha Parag; Jonathan Williman; Natalie Walker
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda.

Authors:  Jean-François Etter; Chris Bullen; Andreas D Flouris; Murray Laugesen; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Analyzing health organizations' use of Twitter for promoting health literacy.

Authors:  Hyojung Park; Shelly Rodgers; Jon Stemmle
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-01-07

4.  Passive exposure to electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use increases desire for combustible and e-cigarettes in young adult smokers.

Authors:  Andrea C King; Lia J Smith; Patrick J McNamara; Alicia K Matthews; Daniel J Fridberg
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Riccardo Polosa
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-04

6.  Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e cigarette) on desire to smoke and withdrawal, user preferences and nicotine delivery: randomised cross-over trial.

Authors:  C Bullen; H McRobbie; S Thornley; M Glover; R Lin; M Laugesen
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Positivity of the English language.

Authors:  Isabel M Kloumann; Christopher M Danforth; Kameron Decker Harris; Catherine A Bliss; Peter Sheridan Dodds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Regulation profiles of e-cigarettes in the United States: a critical review with qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Tremblay; Pierre Pluye; Genevieve Gore; Vera Granikov; Kristian B Filion; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study.

Authors:  Jamie Brown; Emma Beard; Daniel Kotz; Susan Michie; Robert West
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  A cross-sectional examination of marketing of electronic cigarettes on Twitter.

Authors:  Jidong Huang; Rachel Kornfield; Glen Szczypka; Sherry L Emery
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  26 in total

1.  Classification of Helpful Comments on Online Suicide Watch Forums.

Authors:  Ramakanth Kavuluru; Amanda G Williams; María Ramos-Morales; Laura Haye; Tara Holaday; Julie Cerel
Journal:  ACM BCB       Date:  2016-10

2.  On Quantifying Diffusion of Health Information on Twitter.

Authors:  Gokhan Bakal; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  IEEE EMBS Int Conf Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2017-04-13

3.  Valence of Media Coverage About Electronic Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products From 2014 to 2017: Evidence From Automated Content Analysis.

Authors:  Kwanho Kim; Laura A Gibson; Sharon Williams; Yoonsang Kim; Steven Binns; Sherry L Emery; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Capturing the Patient's Perspective: a Review of Advances in Natural Language Processing of Health-Related Text.

Authors:  G Gonzalez-Hernandez; A Sarker; K O'Connor; G Savova
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  Exploratory Analysis of Marketing and Non-marketing E-cigarette Themes on Twitter.

Authors:  Sifei Han; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  Soc Inform (2016)       Date:  2016-10-19

6.  Toward an Aggregate, Implicit, and Dynamic Model of Norm Formation: Capturing Large-Scale Media Representations of Dynamic Descriptive Norms Through Automated and Crowdsourced Content Analysis.

Authors:  Jiaying Liu; Leeann Siegel; Laura A Gibson; Yoonsang Kim; Steven Binns; Sherry Emery; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 7.  Secondary Use of Recorded or Self-expressed Personal Data: Consumer Health Informatics and Education in the Era of Social Media and Health Apps.

Authors:  P Staccini; L Fernandez-Luque
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

8.  Knowledge-Based Biomedical Word Sense Disambiguation with Neural Concept Embeddings

Authors:  Akm Sabbir; Antonio Jimeno-Yepes; Ramakanth Kavuluru
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Bioinformatics Bioeng       Date:  2018-01-11

9.  Whose Post Is It? Predicting E-cigarette Brand from Social Media Posts.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Vandewater; Stephanie L Clendennen; Emily T Hébert; Galya Bigman; Christian D Jackson; Anna V Wilkinson; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2018-03

10.  E-Cigarette Social Media Messages: A Text Mining Analysis of Marketing and Consumer Conversations on Twitter.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard; Adam J Saffer; Gary B Wilcox; Arnold DongWoo Chung; Michael S Mackert; Jay M Bernhardt
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.