Literature DB >> 26975499

Predictive information speeds up visual awareness in an individuation task by modulating threshold setting, not processing efficiency.

Esther De Loof1, Filip Van Opstal2, Tom Verguts3.   

Abstract

Theories on visual awareness claim that predicted stimuli reach awareness faster than unpredicted ones. In the current study, we disentangle whether prior information about the upcoming stimulus affects visual awareness of stimulus location (i.e., individuation) by modulating processing efficiency or threshold setting. Analogous research on stimulus identification revealed that prior information modulates threshold setting. However, as identification and individuation are two functionally and neurally distinct processes, the mechanisms underlying identification cannot simply be extrapolated directly to individuation. The goal of this study was therefore to investigate how individuation is influenced by prior information about the upcoming stimulus. To do so, a drift diffusion model was fitted to estimate the processing efficiency and threshold setting for predicted versus unpredicted stimuli in a cued individuation paradigm. Participants were asked to locate a picture, following a cue that was congruent, incongruent or neutral with respect to the picture's identity. Pictures were individuated faster in the congruent and neutral condition compared to the incongruent condition. In the diffusion model analysis, the processing efficiency was not significantly different across conditions. However, the threshold setting was significantly higher following an incongruent cue compared to both congruent and neutral cues. Our results indicate that predictive information about the upcoming stimulus influences visual awareness by shifting the threshold for individuation rather than by enhancing processing efficiency.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Awareness threshold; Drift diffusion model; Identification; Individuation; Predictive information; Visual awareness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975499     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Dynamic Interactions between Top-Down Expectations and Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Erik L Meijs; Heleen A Slagter; Floris P de Lange; Simon van Gaal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensorimotor predictions shape reported conscious visual experience in a breaking continuous flash suppression task.

Authors:  Lina I Skora; Anil K Seth; Ryan B Scott
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-03-18

3.  More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Authors:  Saga L Svensson; Marius Golubickis; Hollie Maclean; Johanna K Falbén; Linn M Persson; Dimitra Tsamadi; Siobhan Caughey; Arash Sahraie; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-29

4.  Linear Ballistic Accumulator Modeling of Attentional Bias Modification Revealed Disturbed Evidence Accumulation of Negative Information by Explicit Instruction.

Authors:  Yuki Nishiguchi; Jiro Sakamoto; Yoshihiko Kunisato; Keisuke Takano
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-11-07

5.  It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.

Authors:  Johanna K Falbén; Marius Golubickis; Darja Wischerath; Dimitra Tsamadi; Linn M Persson; Siobhan Caughey; Saga L Svensson; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.