Literature DB >> 26975039

Interlaboratory Variability in the Histologic Grading of Colorectal Adenocarcinomas in a Nationwide Cohort.

Chantal C H J Kuijpers1, Caro E Sluijter, Jan H von der Thüsen, Katrien Grünberg, Martijn G H van Oijen, Paul J van Diest, Mehdi Jiwa, Iris D Nagtegaal, Lucy I H Overbeek, Stefan M Willems.   

Abstract

Differentiation grade of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC) is a prognostic factor and important for therapy selection. In patients with stage II colon cancer, poor differentiation is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy. The variability in daily practice in the grading of CRC was assessed in a nationwide cohort. Using the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA), all synoptically reported CRC resections from 2010 to 2013 were identified. Proportions of poorly differentiated (PD) adenocarcinomas were determined and compared between 35 laboratories by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. In total, 11,719 resections of 11,681 patients were included, of which 1427 (12.2%) were PD (range between 35 laboratories: 5.0% to 33.2%). After adjustment for case mix, 4 (11%) laboratories still reported a significantly lower (n=2) or higher (n=2) proportion of PD adenocarcinoma compared with the reference laboratory. Seven of 8 investigated laboratories showed considerable intralaboratory variation between pathologists as well. In a subgroup of 2812 patients (2813 tumors) who could have been eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy solely on the basis of the differentiation grade (stage II colon cancer patients without other high-risk factors [ie, T4, <10 lymph nodes evaluated, perforation, ileus, or angioinvasion]), 258 (9.2%) were PD (range between laboratories: 0% to 22.7%). In this subgroup, 4 laboratories still diagnosed significantly more PD adenocarcinomas after multivariable logistic regression analysis, increasing the number of colon cancer patients eligible for adjuvant therapy. In conclusion, this large nationwide cohort demonstrates considerable interlaboratory and intralaboratory variation in differentiation grading of CRC. Better standardization of grading criteria is needed for optimal determination of prognosis and treatment selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26975039     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  6 in total

1.  Inflammation-based prognostic scores as indicators to select candidates for primary site resection followed by multimodal therapy among colorectal cancer patients with multiple metastases.

Authors:  Tadanobu Shimura; Yuji Toiyama; Susumu Saigusa; Hiroki Imaoka; Masato Okigami; Hiroyuki Fujikawa; Junichiro Hiro; Minako Kobayashi; Masaki Ohi; Toshimitsu Araki; Yasuhiro Inoue; Keiichi Uchida; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Practice as a Next Step after Going Digital: The UMC Utrecht Perspective.

Authors:  Rachel N Flach; Nina L Fransen; Andreas F P Sonnen; Tri Q Nguyen; Gerben E Breimer; Mitko Veta; Nikolas Stathonikos; Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Dual specificity phosphatase 5 is a novel prognostic indicator for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xuebing Yan; Liguo Liu; Hao Li; Linsheng Huang; Mingming Yin; Cheng Pan; Huanlong Qin; Zhiming Jin
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Interobserver, intraobserver, and interlaboratory variability in reporting pT4a colon cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte E L Klaver; Nicole Bulkmans; Paul Drillenburg; Heike I Grabsch; Nicole C T van Grieken; Arend Karrenbeld; Lianne Koens; Ineke van Lijnschoten; Jos Meijer; Iris D Nagtegaal; Xavier Sagaert; Kees Seldenrijk; M F van Velthuysen; Annette H Bruggink; Pieter J Tanis; Petur Snaebjornsson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Significant inter- and intra-laboratory variation in grading of invasive breast cancer: A nationwide study of 33,043 patients in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest; Stefan M Willems; Chantal C H J Kuijpers; Elsken van der Wall; Lucy I H Overbeek; Ivette A G Deckers
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Poorly differentiated clusters and tumor budding are important prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Aura Jurescu; Alis Dema; Adrian Văduva; Adelina Gheju; Octavia Vița; Robert Barna; Codruța Lăzureanu; Marioara Cornianu; Sorina Tăban; Ciprian Duță; Stelian Pantea
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.363

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.