Literature DB >> 26973928

The Role of Psychosocial and Belief Factors in Self-Reported Cigarette Smoking Among University Students in Malaysia.

Sami Al-Dubai1, Kurubaran Ganasegeran2, Mustafa Alshagga3, Aamenah Hawash4, Wahid Wajih5, Saba Kassim6.   

Abstract

This study aimed to explore factors associated, specifically belief factors, with self-reported tobacco smoking status. A sample of 300 students was recruited from a private university in Malaysia. Data was collected using a pre-tested self-administrated questionnaire that investigated various factors including socio-demographics, socio-economic status, smoking behavior and beliefs on tobacco smoking. The main tobacco use in this study sample was cigarettes and the estimated prevalence of self-reported cigarette smoking was 10.3%. In bivariate analysis, self-reported cigarette smoking was significantly associated with socio-demographic, behavioral factors and faculty of study (P<0.05). In multivariate modeling, being male and a non-medical student, did not exercise, having a smoker father and brother or sister, suffering from financial difficulties and having the belief that smokers had more friends, all had statistically significant associations (P<0.05) with self-reported cigarette smoking. Social and interpersonal factors were associated with self-reported cigarette smoking status. A comprehensive health model focusing on changing the social norms of parent and sibling tobacco smoking and students' beliefs, alongside nurturing skills of dealing with stressful situations, warrant implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  financial difficulties; friendship; physically inactive; social modeling; tobacco

Year:  2014        PMID: 26973928      PMCID: PMC4768556          DOI: 10.4081/hpr.2014.1195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol Res        ISSN: 2420-8124


Introduction

Tobacco smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity (lung cancer) and mortality (fatal malignancies) worldwide.[1] The prevalence of tobacco smoking amongst students (at university, college and undergraduates) varies according to a constellation of factors that include definition of tobacco smoking status, seniority in academic year, academic specialty and gender. For instance, the prevalence of at least one smoking occasion among college students was reported to be 57.7% in Germany, 26.7% in Pakistan, 34.5% in Turkey.[2-4] In a representative sample of all undergraduate students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the overall prevalence of tobacco smoking amongst students was estimated at 14.5% and amongst male was 32.7% and female 5.9%.[5] The current literature suggests that a range of factors are associated with tobacco smoking amongst university students. These include personality factors, stress, parental smoking, socio-economic status, ethnicity, academic achievement and smoking was also found to be associated with alcohol use in smoker students.[6-14] Importantly, one of the major problems of smoking is the students’ belief towards smoking. Females were reported to be more likely to believe that cigarette smoking controls weight, whereas males believed it to help have and to make friendships.[15,16] Currently there are many conceptual frameworks (Health Belief Model, Social Learning Theory, the Theory of Reasoned Action) for understanding the health related behaviors that include tobacco smoking.[17-19] The theory of the triadic influences (TTI) which integrated many conceptual frameworks of behavior, described by Brian et al.,[20] has been adapted to help understand tobacco smoking amongst university students in Malaysia. The TTI postulates that the execution of heath related behavior is based on three streams; cultural, social and intrapersonal influences. A person’s cultural environment has influences on their health related values, knowledge, expectations, and evaluation regarding their financial situation and the social consequences of health related behavior. Social influences are thought to originate in one’s current social situation or immediate microenvironment and flow through factors that affect social normative beliefs regarding health related behaviors. Finally, intrapersonal influences are suggested to originate in a person’s inherited disposition and personality characteristics, and flow through health related self-efficacy. The TTI contends that attitudinal, social, and intrapersonal influences affect health-related decisions both independently and in unison.[20] Apart from a singular study amongst university students in Malaysia, there is a dearth of information on factors, specifically beliefs, associated with tobacco smoking status amongst this group. Exploring in depth the factors associated with tobacco smoking amongst university students in Malaysia is a crucial step for preventing the uptake of tobacco smoking behavior in the first place and also to target potential factors for current tobacco smoking amongst students through establishing tobacco control strategies. [21] This study aimed to enumerate student tobacco smokers and to determine the associated factors, specifically belief factors, of tobacco smoking among students in a single university in Malaysia. We hypothesized that there would be similar associated factors of self-reported tobacco smoking in Malaysian university students as with other university students.

Materials and Methods

Study design, sample size estimation and selection

A cross-sectional study was conducted among students of a private university in Malaysia. A mixed method of sampling was employed. Of the 300 students participating in this study, a universal sample of all the 150 medical students was recruited. The remaining 150 was an equal convenience sample of 150 non-medical students from the same university. This later method was employed due to ease of access, cost and time. Eligibility criteria included students aged 18 years and above who only spoke English or/and Malay.

Instruments

A self-administrated questionnaire based on factors previously identified and validated as correlates of self-report-tobacco smoking amongst university students was used for data collection.[21-23] The first part included questions on socio-demographic, socio-economic and behavioral factors such as age, gender, race, marital status, faculty, residential status, living arrangement (living with family or not), drinking alcohol, and use of sleeping pills and anti-depressive drugs. The dependent variable, tobacco smoking status, was defined as daily or occasional smoking in the past 30 days.[24,25] In the second part, familial and peer factors were assessed by questions on the level of parental education, smoking status of mother, father, siblings and friends, marital status of parents (married or separated), and whether one or both parents have passed away. Smokers were asked whether their parents knew that they were smokers and whether they accept that fact. The third part included 17 statements on student beliefs and views of smoking such as smoking is harmful to health, tobacco is addictive, smoking makes a person more attractive, someone who is smoking has more friends, smoking makes one less depressed, smoking helps in controlling things better, smoking makes one less tired, etc; with responses given as either a yes or no. The fourth part included questions to assess smoking behavior such as age of starting smoking, number of cigarettes smoked per day, duration of smoking in years, factors influencing them to smoke (included items such as just want to try, influence of friends and feelings of depression/anxiety) and factors that increase their urge to smoke (included items such as stressful situations, heavy meal, drinking coffee etc). The participants were also asked whether they had ever tried to stop smoking and if they had the intention to quit smoking in the coming three months.

Data collection and ethical approval

The data was collected over one month in January, 2011. Students were approached in their classrooms after finishing lectures. Arrangements with lecturers and course co-coordinators were ensured prior to data collection. The purpose of the study was explained to students orally and in a written form attached with the questionnaire. They were informed that participation was voluntary and their withdrawal at any time from the study would not affect their academic progress. One calibrated data collector was made available to clarify any ambiguity of questions. Confidentiality of participation and the information obtained was ensured and each participant signed an informed consent form. This study project was approved by the research committee in the Management and Science University.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables such as age and monthly income were categorized around the mean if normality assumption was met (Kolmogorov Smirnov), otherwise the median was used, in order to ease interpretation and comparisons. Descriptive statistics were obtained for all the variables in the study. Chi-square test was used to assess the association between smoking status and other variables in the study. Daily or occasional smoking in the past 30 days was combined into one category (smoker). Multiple logistic regression analysis with Backward LR technique was performed to obtain the significant factors associated with self-reported smoking status among students. All independent variables with significant associations with smoking status in bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Multi-colinearity between independent variables was checked for by the values of standard errors (SE) not exceeding 5 and the most important predictor of self-reported tobacco smoking through the Wald Value. The accepted level of significance in this study was set at P<0.05. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 16.

Results

General sample socio-demographic, socio-economic and behavioral characteristics

The mean (±SD) age of the respondents was 22.1 (±2.2) years. Sixty nine percent were females, 50.3% Malay and 95.3 singles. About 30% and 40% of participants’ mothers and fathers had university level of education. Ten students (3.3%) stated their parents were divorced and twenty (6.6%) stated one of their parents passed away. Half of the respondents lived with their parents. Table 1 reports behavioral characteristics of respondents and their social models (father, mother, sibling and friend smoking status).
Table 1.

Behavioral characteristics of participants and their social models in 300 students in a private Malaysian university.

N%
Self-reported (cigarette) smoking3110.3
Drinking alcohol248
Doing exercise21772.3
Having trouble sleeping7123.7
Taking sleeping pills51.7
Taking anti-depressive drugs51.7
Taking mood enhancing drug51.7
Father smokes8729.0
Mother smokes20.7
Brother and/or sister smokes7926.3
Friend smokes21270.7

Tobacco smokers’ characteristics

Out of 31 smoker students, 58.1% started smoking between 13 to 18 years old and 25.8% started before age 13 years. Sixty eight percent and 64.5% stated their fathers and mothers (respectively) did not know they were smokers. The majority (83.9%) had smoked for more than one year and smoked more than 5 cigarettes per day. Ninety four percent of smokers tried to stop smoking but failed, and 63.3% reported that they had the intention to stop smoking in the coming three months. The most common reason for smoking was just wanting to try it (71.0%), followed by influence of friends (67.7%), feeling depressed and anxious (58.1%), stress of academic life (45.%) then influence of people in the community (32.3%). The least reason was packaging of the cigarettes or its advertisements (12.9%). As for the factors that increase the urge to smoke, the most important factor was stressful situation (77.4%) followed by the effect of weather (64.5%) then by heavy meals (51.6%) (Table1).

Belief factors and self-reported tobacco smoking

Out of the 17 beliefs on tobacco smoking, five were associated significantly with self-reported tobacco smoking (Table 2). Other factors including it is difficult to quit smoking, smoking is harmful to health, tobacco is addictive, smoking makes a person more attractive and smoking makes one less tired did not associate significantly with self-reported tobacco smoking.
Table 2.

Belief factors associated significantly with self-reported tobacco smoking in 300 students in a private Malaysian university.

BeliefsN (%)Smokers, N (%)Non-smokers, N (%)OR (95%CI)P
Smoking affects weight
   Yes249(83)20 (8.0)229 (92.0)3.1 (1.40-7.07)0.004
   No51(17)11 (21.6)40 (78.4)
Smokers had more friends
   Yes100 (33.3)20 (20.0)80 (80.0)4.3 (1.97-9.38)0.001
   No200 (66.7)11 (5.5)189 (94.5)
Smoking help people feel more comfortable
   Yes96(32)15 (15.6)81 (84.4)2.2 (1.03-4.61)0.039
   No204(68)16 (7.8)188 (92.2)
Smoking makes one less depressed
   Yes115 (38.3)17 (14.8)98 (85.2)2.1 (1.0-4.48)0.046
   No185 (61.7)14 (7.6)171 (92.4)
Smoking help thinking more clearly
   Yes68 (22.7)12 (17.6)56 (82.4)2.4 (1.10-5.24)0.024
   No232 (77.3)19 (8.2)213 (91.8)

Bivariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with self-reported tobacco smoking

In the bivariate analysis, socio-demographic, behavioral and social models factors associated significantly with self-reported tobacco smoking (Table 3). Males and non-medical students were more likely to self-report tobacco smoking (OR=5.7, 95%CI 2.58-12.79, P<0.001; OR=3.9, 95%CI 1.62-9.34, P=0.002, respectively). Other factors investigated including parents socio-economic status, smoking of mother and having unsolved family problems were not found to be associated with self-reported tobacco smoking (P>0.05).
Table 3.

Factors associated significantly with self-reported tobacco smoking in 300 students in a private Malaysian university.

VariableSmoking statusOR95%CIP-value
Yes, N. (%)No, N. (%)
Gender2.58-12.790.001
   Male21 (22.6)72 (77.4)1.0
   Female10 (4.8)197 (95.2)5.7
Faculty
   Medical7 (4.7)143 (95.3)1.01.62-9.340.002
   Non medical24 (16.0)126 (84.0)3.9
Alcohol
   Yes7 (29.2)17 (70.8)1.01.63-11.460.006
   No24 (8.7)252 (91.3)4.3
Exercise
   Yes16 (7.4)201 (92.6)1.00.17-0.770.010
   No15 (18.1)68 (81.9)0.4
Father smokes
   Yes18 (20.7)69 (79.3)1.01.87-8.620.001
   No13 (6.1)200 (93.9)4.01
Brother and/or sister smokes
   Yes21 (26.6)58 (73.4)1.03.41-17.130.001
   No10 (4.5)211 (95.5)7.6
Friend smoking
   Yes28 (13.2)184 (86.8)1.01.28-14.580.011
   No3 (3.4)85 (96.6)4.31
Having any problems with boyfriend/girlfriend
   Yes12 (20.0)48 (80.0)1.01.31-6.400.015
   No18 (8.0)208 (92.0)2.9
Having financial difficulties
   Yes21 (17.4)100 (82.6)1.01.60-7.840.002
   No10 (5.6)169 (94.4)3.5
In the multiple logistic regressions model, significant factors associated with self-reported tobacco smoking among university students were: being male (OR=6.1, 95%CI 2.2-16.8, P<0.001), non-medical student (OR=4.9, 95%CI 1.7-14.2, P=0.004), did not exercise (OR=3.2, 95%CI 1.2-9.1, P=0.030), father being a smoker (OR=3.7, 95%CI 1.3-10.5, P=0.016), brother and/or sister being a smoker (OR=6.7, 95%CI 2.4-18.7, P<0.001), suffering financial difficulties (OR=4.6, 95%CI 1.6-13.0, P=0.004) and believed that smokers had more friends (OR=4.3, 95%CI 1.5-11.8, P=0.006) (Table 4). The most important factor emerging in this model was tobacco smoking of brother and/or sister as indicated by the high Wald value. The total model was significant (P<0.001) and accounted for 52% of the variance (Table 4).
Table 4

Multivariate binary logistic regression final model of factors predicting self-reported tobacco smoking status in a 300 students in a private Malaysian university.

VariableAdjusted OR95% CIP-value
Gender
   Male6.12.2-16.80.013
   Female1.0
Faculty
   Medical1.01.7-14.20.004
   Non medical4.9
Exercise
   No3.21.2-9.10.030
   Yes1.0
Father smoke
   Yes3.71.3-10.50.016
   No1.0
Brother and/or sister smokes
   Yes6.72.4-18.70.010
   No1.0
Having financial difficulties
   Yes4.61.6-13.00.004
   No1.0
Smoking affects weight
   No2.60.8-8.80.128
   Yes1.0
Smokers had more friends
   Yes4.31.5-11.80.006
   No1.0

Discussion

This cross sectional study aimed to estimate tobacco smoking and explore the most important potential factors, with specific focus on beliefs, of students’ tobacco smoking status. Of the 300 students surveyed, 10.3% self-reported cigarette smoking. Our final model has shown the significant importance of cultural-environmental, social and interpersonal influences as factors in tobacco smoking status. Students self-reporting cigarette smoking were more likely to be male, attending non-medical college, have father or sibling smokers, be facing financial difficulties and believing that smoking helps in promoting friendship as well as being less likely to do physical activities. The estimated prevalence of tobacco smoking in this sample was comparatively lower to that found in other studies among university students in Malaysia.[21] Discrepancies in prevalence rates of smoking were observed in previous studies.[26-28] It is noteworthy to mention that due to overrepresentation of medical students, high female participants as well as the convenience sampling comparison should be avoided. With respect to the associated factors of smoking status, our study found significantly higher rates of smoking among males. Similar findings were found in previous studies.[5,27] Higher rates of tobacco smoking were observed among non-medical students in comparison to medical students. This finding lent further support to the current literature.[14] According to Tamaki et al. these discrepancies could be attributed to the fact that medical students are more aware of the health effects of tobacco smoking due to their nature of study. The significant association of social models tobacco smoking i.e. father, sibling (brother and sister) in self- reported tobacco smoking in this study sample also confirmed previous research.[4,5,29] An insignificant relationship between smoking and being physically inactivate was found in this study. The findings from the current literature are contradicting. There has been conflicting data published with regards to the associations between smoking and unhealthy behaviors such as poor eating and physical inactivity.[30-33] The association of self-reported tobacco smoking with the belief that smoking controls weight and that the smoker had more friends may add weight to what has been reported amongst other students in Malaysian universities.[21] Tobacco smoking and cessation has been reported as one of the environmental factors influencing low BMI and weight gain, though variation should be taken into consideration.[34,35] The association of tobacco smoking amongst university students with the belief that smoking affects weight has also confirmed data found amongst Western university students.[36] The association between smoking and the belief that it helps to have and make friends has also confirmed what has been reported elsewhere.[16] Finally, no relationship was found between students’ family socio-economic status and tobacco smoking. However, the tobacco smoking amongst this study sample was found to be associated with students’ perceived financial difficulties. This can be interpreted as either during university the student is financially independent from their family income so may face financial difficulties related to their faculty demands leaving less time to work and earn. Alternatively, the transition to the university life is acknowledged as a period of increased freedom and permissiveness of social norms and as such students may partake in risky behaviors such as smoking and alcohol drinking which may subject them to a financial difficulty. The role of stressful situations such as living in deprived areas, coming from a poor socio-economic background or being subjected to any acute stressful situation were found to be predictors of smoking, as well as being associated with the urge to smoke and maintenance of smoking. Therefore, one can postulate that financial difficulties, through the stress it creates, can be a risk factor that can initiate starting and maintaining smoking.[37-41]

Limitations of this study

Firstly, the sampling method may make the findings of this study spurious and only any extrapolated of the results should be applied to this study sample. Secondly, though the data questionnaires were filled in by the participants themselves to limit social desirability, the self-reported tobacco smoking may have been underestimated; biochemical validation of self-reported tobacco smoking was not verified.

Implication and future direction

A holistic approach should be adopted to aid in the prevention of the uptake of tobacco smoking and tobacco cessation. Education involving parents, peers, universities and health authorities is vital to implement smoking cessation support. The need to change beliefs and cultivate hatred and refusal skills towards tobacco smoking is essential as it is through these perspectives that young people’s perceptions towards beliefs, social, cultural and behavioral norms are filtered from early years of adolescents through the development of adulthood, which is critical for smoking cessation. A comprehensive health model that incorporates not just tobacco antismoking but also other health behaviors including healthy eating and exercises should be considered.[36]

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study showed that social and interpersonal factors were associated with self-reporting cigarette smoking status. Strategies should focus on these influences by changing the social norms of parents and siblings tobacco smoking as well as students’ beliefs. Strategies should be undertaken to equip students with skills of dealing with stressful situations and instill healthy lifestyle ideals.
  32 in total

1.  Stress and smoking in adolescence: a test of directional hypotheses.

Authors:  Thomas A Wills; James M Sandy; Alison M Yaeger
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Smoking among Nepali youth--prevalence and predictors.

Authors:  V S Binu; S H Subba; R G Menezes; Ganesh Kumar; Jefy Ninan; M S Rana; Shovit Khadka Chhetri; K M Sabu; K Nagraj
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2010

3.  Smoking, weight loss intention and obesity-promoting behaviors in college students.

Authors:  Shawna L Carroll; Rebecca E Lee; Harsohena Kaur; Kari J Harris; Myra L Strother; Terry T-K Huang
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  College student involvement in cigarette smoking: the role of psychosocial and behavioral protection and risk.

Authors:  Frances M Costa; Richard Jessor; Mark S Turbin
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Attenuated beta endorphin response to acute stress is associated with smoking relapse.

Authors:  Darcy Shaw; Mustafa al'Absi
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Prevalence and of smoking and associated factors among Malaysian University students.

Authors:  Redhwan Ahmed Al-Naggar; Sami Abdo Radman Al-Dubai; Thekra Hamoud Al-Naggar; Robert Chen; Karim Al-Jashamy
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

7.  Prevalence and characteristics of cigarette smokers among undergraduates of the University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

Authors:  A E Fawibe; A O Shittu
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Determinants and patterns of physical activity practice among Spanish university students.

Authors:  Dora Romaguera; Pedro Tauler; Miquel Bennasar; Jordi Pericas; Carlos Moreno; Sonia Martinez; Antoni Aguilo
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Prevalence of and factors associated with smoking among Japanese medical students.

Authors:  Tetsuo Tamaki; Yoshitaka Kaneita; Takashi Ohida; Eise Yokoyama; Yoneatsu Osaki; Hideyuki Kanda; Shinji Takemura; Kenji Hayashi
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.