Literature DB >> 26972966

Disentangling beat perception from sequential learning and examining the influence of attention and musical abilities on ERP responses to rhythm.

Fleur L Bouwer1, Carola M Werner2, Myrthe Knetemann2, Henkjan Honing2.   

Abstract

Beat perception is the ability to perceive temporal regularity in musical rhythm. When a beat is perceived, predictions about upcoming events can be generated. These predictions can influence processing of subsequent rhythmic events. However, statistical learning of the order of sounds in a sequence can also affect processing of rhythmic events and must be differentiated from beat perception. In the current study, using EEG, we examined the effects of attention and musical abilities on beat perception. To ensure we measured beat perception and not absolute perception of temporal intervals, we used alternating loud and soft tones to create a rhythm with two hierarchical metrical levels. To control for sequential learning of the order of the different sounds, we used temporally regular (isochronous) and jittered rhythmic sequences. The order of sounds was identical in both conditions, but only the regular condition allowed for the perception of a beat. Unexpected intensity decrements were introduced on the beat and offbeat. In the regular condition, both beat perception and sequential learning were expected to enhance detection of these deviants on the beat. In the jittered condition, only sequential learning was expected to affect processing of the deviants. ERP responses to deviants were larger on the beat than offbeat in both conditions. Importantly, this difference was larger in the regular condition than in the jittered condition, suggesting that beat perception influenced responses to rhythmic events in addition to sequential learning. The influence of beat perception was present both with and without attention directed at the rhythm. Moreover, beat perception as measured with ERPs correlated with musical abilities, but only when attention was directed at the stimuli. Our study shows that beat perception is possible when attention is not directed at a rhythm. In addition, our results suggest that attention may mediate the influence of musical abilities on beat perception.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Attention; Beat perception; ERP; Musical rhythm; Sequential learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26972966     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  8 in total

1.  Task-irrelevant auditory metre shapes visuomotor sequential learning.

Authors:  Alexis Deighton MacIntyre; Hong Ying Josephine Lo; Ian Cross; Sophie Scott
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-12

2.  Violation of rhythmic expectancies can elicit late frontal gamma activity nested in theta oscillations.

Authors:  M Edalati; M Mahmoudzadeh; J Safaie; F Wallois; S Moghimi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.348

3.  What makes a rhythm complex? The influence of musical training and accent type on beat perception.

Authors:  Fleur L Bouwer; J Ashley Burgoyne; Daan Odijk; Henkjan Honing; Jessica A Grahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Perception of Leitmotives in Richard Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen.

Authors:  David J Baker; Daniel Müllensiefen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-04

5.  Editorial: The Evolution of Rhythm Cognition: Timing in Music and Speech.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Henkjan Honing; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Neurophysiological Markers of Statistical Learning in Music and Language: Hierarchy, Entropy, and Uncertainty.

Authors:  Tatsuya Daikoku
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Sense Isochrony in Rhythm, but Not the Beat: Additional Support for the Gradual Audiomotor Evolution Hypothesis.

Authors:  Henkjan Honing; Fleur L Bouwer; Luis Prado; Hugo Merchant
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Unpredictability of the "when" influences prediction error processing of the "what" and "where".

Authors:  Vera Tsogli; Sebastian Jentschke; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.