| Literature DB >> 26972813 |
Kim Hesketh1, Wudbhav Sankar2, Benjamin Joseph3, Unni Narayanan4, Kishore Mulpuri5,6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) following reconstructive hip surgery in cerebral palsy (CP) ranges from 0 to 69 % in the current literature. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability of radiographically diagnosing AVN in children with CP after hip surgery.Entities:
Keywords: AVN; Avascular necrosis; Cerebral palsy; Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability; Reconstructive hip surgery for children with CP
Year: 2016 PMID: 26972813 PMCID: PMC4837166 DOI: 10.1007/s11832-016-0723-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
AVN-positive hips—number of surgeons reporting
| Subject no. | No. of surgeons reporting AVN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right hip | Left hip | |||
| Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | |
| 1 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| 2 | – | – | 3 | 3 |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 11 | – | – | 2a | 1 |
| 15 | 4 | 4 | – | – |
| 17 | 2a | 1 | – | – |
| 19 | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| 20 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| 21 | – | – | 2 | 3 |
| 22 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| 23 | – | – | 4 | 4 |
| 27 | – | – | 1 | 3a |
| 28 | 4 | 4 | – | – |
| 29 | 2a | 1 | – | – |
| 30 | 4 | 3 | – | – |
| 33 | 3 | 3 | – | – |
| 34 | – | – | 2 | 3 |
| 35 | 1 | 2a | – | – |
| 47 | – | – | 0 | 3a |
| 48 | 4 | 4 | – | – |
| 49 | 4 | 4 | – | – |
| 52 | – | – | 2a | 1 |
| 53 | – | – | 4 | 3 |
| 54 | – | – | 2 | 2 |
| 65 | 2a | 1 | – | – |
aIndicates hip met AVN criteria for only the specified trial; dashes indicate hip was classified as AVN-negative
Fig. 1Optimal and suboptimal agreement between pediatric orthopaedic surgeons on the presence of avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head in children with cerebral palsy. Anteroposterior radiographs of the hips were identified to have AVN by a 4/4 surgeons (left hip), and b 2/4 surgeons (right hip)
Intra-observer reliability—kappa values and interpretation
| Kappa values | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgeon 1 | Surgeon 2 | Surgeon 3 | Surgeon 4 | |
| All hips | 0.80 (G) | 0.72 (G) | 0.65 (G) | 0.88 (V) |
| Right hip | 0.84 (V) | 0.69 (G) | 0.69 (G) | 0.82 (V) |
| Left hip | 0.77 (G) | 0.75 (G) | 0.60 (M) | 0.93 (V) |
Altman [1] kappa values: V, very good; G, good; M, moderate
Inter-observer reliability––kappa values and interpretation
| Surgeon pair | Kappa values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Mean | |
| 1–2 | 0.46 (M) | 0.55 (M) | 0.50 (M) |
| 1–3 | 0.63 (G) | 0.74 (G) | 0.69 (G) |
| 1–4 | 0.77 (G) | 0.67 (G) | 0.72 (G) |
| 2–3 | 0.49 (M) | 0.46 (M) | 0.47 (M) |
| 2–4 | 0.45 (M) | 0.41 (M) | 0.43 (M) |
| 3–4 | 0.62 (G) | 0.53 (M) | 0.57 (M) |
Altman [1] kappa values: G good, M moderate
Inter-observer reliability by hip—kappa values and interpretation
| Surgeon pair | Kappa values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Mean | |
| Right hip | |||
| 1–2 | 0.48 (M) | 0.48 (M) | 0.48 (M) |
| 1–3 | 0.74 (G) | 0.63 (G) | 0.69 (G) |
| 1–4 | 0.84 (V) | 0.82 (V) | 0.83 (V) |
| 2–3 | 0.5 (M) | 0.47 (M) | 0.49 (M) |
| 2–4 | 0.37 (F) | 0.48 (M) | 0.43 (M) |
| 3–4 | 0.72 (G) | 0.63 (G) | 0.67 (G) |
| Left hip | |||
| 1–2 | 0.44 (M) | 0.59 (M) | 0.52 (M) |
| 1–3 | 0.53 (M) | 0.83 (V) | 0.68 (G) |
| 1–4 | 0.72 (G) | 0.57 (M) | 0.65 (G) |
| 2–3 | 0.49 (M) | 0.45 (M) | 0.47 (M) |
| 2–4 | 0.54 (M) | 0.36 (F) | 0.45 (M) |
| 3–4 | 0.53 (M) | 0.43 (M) | 0.48 (M) |
Altman [1] kappa values: V very good, G good, M moderate, F fair