Literature DB >> 26972335

Effects of static magnetic fields on bone regeneration of implants in the rabbit: micro-CT, histologic, microarray, and real-time PCR analyses.

Eun-Cheol Kim1, Richard Leesungbok2, Suk-Won Lee2, Ji-Youn Hong3, Eun-Jin Ko2, Su-Jin Ahn2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of static magnetic fields (SMFs) on bone regeneration around titanium implants by μCT, histologic analysis, microarrays, and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neodymium magnets provided the source of SMFs, the specimens were grade 5 titanium implants, and the animals were twenty-seven adult male New Zealand white rabbits. These implants were divided into six groups according to the presence of a magnet and predetermined healing period (1, 4, and 8 weeks). Each group comprised six specimens for μCT (n = 6) and histologic examination, and three specimens (n = 3) for microarrays and qRT-PCR, yielding a total of 54 specimens.
RESULTS: The μCT data showed that SMFs increased bone volume fraction (bone volume/total volume, BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th). Histologic observation indicated that SMFs promoted new bone formation and direct bony contact with implants. Microarray analysis identified 293 genes upregulated (>twofold) in response to SMFs. The upregulated genes included extracellular matrix (ECM)-related genes (COL10A1, COL9A1, and COL12A1) and growth factor (GF)-related genes (CTGF and PDGFD), and the upregulation was confirmed by qRT-PCR. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis revealed the involvement of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Wnt, and PPAR-gamma signaling pathways in implant healing.
CONCLUSIONS: μCT, histology, microarrays, and real-time PCR indicate that SMFs could be an effective approach to improving bone regeneration around dental implants.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone regeneration; implant; micro-computed tomography; microarray; static magnetic fields

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26972335     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field protocols in implant osseointegration: in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes; Camila Lopes Ferreira; Daniella Vicensotto Bernardo; Cássia Carolina Rabelo Lopes; Luma Collino; Victória Clara da Silva Lima; Daphne de Camargo Reis Mello; Luana Marotta Reis de Vasconcellos; Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pro-osteogenesis and in vivo tracking investigation of a dental implantation system comprising novel mTi implant and HYH-Fe particles.

Authors:  Xiyu Li; Juan Wu; Danxue Li; Qin Zou; Yi Man; Ling Zou; Wei Li
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-02-12

Review 3.  The Review of Bioeffects of Static Magnetic Fields on the Oral Tissue-Derived Cells and Its Application in Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Wei-Zhen Lew; Sheng-Wei Feng; Sheng-Yang Lee; Haw-Ming Huang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Bone mesenchymal stem cells stimulation by magnetic nanoparticles and a static magnetic field: release of exosomal miR-1260a improves osteogenesis and angiogenesis.

Authors:  Di Wu; Xiao Chang; Jingjing Tian; Lin Kang; Yuanhao Wu; Jieying Liu; Xiangdong Wu; Yue Huang; Bo Gao; Hai Wang; Guixing Qiu; Zhihong Wu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 10.435

5.  Static Magnetic Fields Enhance the Chondrogenesis of Mandibular Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Coculture Systems.

Authors:  Ming Zhang; Weihao Li; Wei He; Yanhua Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.