Literature DB >> 26971670

Patterns of Sacral Sparing Components on Neurologic Recovery in Newly Injured Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Steven C Kirshblum1, Amanda L Botticello2, Trevor A Dyson-Hudson2, Rachel Byrne3, Ralph J Marino4, Daniel P Lammertse5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the patterns of sacral sparing and recovery in newly injured persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of data from the national Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems (SCIMS) database for patients enrolled from January 2011 to February 2015.
SETTING: SCIMS centers. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (N=1738; age ≥16y) with traumatic SCI admitted to rehabilitation within 30 days after injury with follow-up at discharge, at 1 year, or both.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury examination results at admission and follow-up (discharge or 1y, or both).
RESULTS: Conversion from an initial American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade A to incomplete status was 20% at rehabilitation discharge and 27.8% at 1 year, and was greater in cervical and low paraplegia levels (T10 and below) than in high paraplegia level injuries (T1-9). Conversion from AIS B to motor incomplete was 33.9% at discharge and 53.6% at 1 year, and the initial sparing of all sacral sensory components was correlated with the greatest conversion to motor incomplete status at discharge and at 1 year. For patients with initial AIS C, the presence of voluntary anal contraction (VAC) in association with other sacral sparing was most frequently observed to improve to AIS D status at discharge. However, the presence of VAC alone as the initial sacral sparing component had the poorest prognosis for recovery to AIS D status. At follow-up, regaining sacral sparing components correlated with improvement in conversion for patients with initial AIS B and C.
CONCLUSIONS: The components of initial and follow-up sacral sparing indicated differential patterns of neurologic outcome in persons with traumatic SCI. The more sacral components initially spared, the greater the potential for recovery; and the more sacral components gained, the greater the chance of motor recovery. Consideration of whether VAC should remain a diagnostic criterion sufficient for motor incomplete classification in the absence of other qualifying sublesional motor sparing is recommended.
Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Neurologic examination; Prognosis; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971670     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  9 in total

1.  Assessing the ability of the Sacral Autonomic Standards to document bladder and bowel function based upon the Asia Impairment Scale.

Authors:  Marca Alexander; Conley Carr; Jagger Alexander; Yuying Chen; Amie McLain
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-10-18

2.  Patient preferences for order of the sensory portion of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination.

Authors:  Steven Kirshblum; Michelle Didesch; Amanda Botticello; Bryan Kong; Darine Androwis
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 3.  The importance of the bulbocavernosus reflex.

Authors:  Jean Gabriel Previnaire
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2018-01-10

4.  Reliability of S3 pressure sensation and voluntary hip adduction/toe flexion and agreement with deep anal pressure and voluntary anal contraction in classifying persons with traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Mary Schmidt-Read; Anna Chen; Steven C Kirshblum; Trevor A Dyson-Hudson; Edelle Field-Fote; Ross Zafonte
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Development and validation of a bowel-routine-based self-report questionnaire for sacral sparing after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Liu; H Xing; M-W Zhou; F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  The 2019 revision of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI)-What's new?

Authors: 
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 2.772

7.  Toward Improving the Prediction of Functional Ambulation After Spinal Cord Injury Through the Inclusion of Limb Accelerations During Sleep and Personal Factors.

Authors:  Stephanie K Rigot; Michael L Boninger; Dan Ding; Gina McKernan; Edelle C Field-Fote; Jeanne Hoffman; Rachel Hibbs; Lynn A Worobey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  The neuroanatomical-functional paradox in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Karim Fouad; Phillip G Popovich; Marcel A Kopp; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 44.711

9.  Pathophysiology, Classification and Comorbidities after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  James Guest; Nilanjana Datta; George Jimsheleishvili; David R Gater
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.