Zdeněk Stárek1,2, František Lehar3,4, Jiří Jež3,4, Alena Žbánková3,4, Tomáš Kulík3,4, Jiří Wolf3,4, Miroslav Novák3,4. 1. International Clinical Research Center, 1st Department of Internal Medicine-Cardioangiology, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. zdenek.starek@fnusa.cz. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. zdenek.starek@fnusa.cz. 3. International Clinical Research Center, 1st Department of Internal Medicine-Cardioangiology, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. 4. Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) and 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) of the left atrium (LA) are used to evaluate the esophagus prior to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to compare preprocedural and periprocedural views of the esophagus and the left atrium. METHODS: From September 2011 to August 2012, 3DRA and CT of the LA were performed on 56 patients before they underwent catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. The 3DRA was performed periprocedurally, and the CT was performed an average of 20 days prior to the procedure. 3D models of the LA and the esophagus were then segmented on the EP Navigator V 3.1 workstation. Five positions of the esophagus, A-E, in order from left to right, were evaluated. RESULTS: The most common position of the esophagus was behind the left part of the LA (CT, position B (n = 26)) and behind the central part of the LA (3DRA, position C (n = 21)). The maximum shift of the esophagus was three positions, and the average shift was 0.857 ± 0.766 of a position. There was a shift of one position in 44.6 % of the patients, two positions in 17.9 %, and three positions in 1.8 %. A statistically significant difference was found between the positions of the esophagus when the 3DRA and CT evaluations were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The most common position of the esophagus was behind the middle and left part of the LA. The outpatient views of the esophagus obtained before ablation did not reflect the position of the esophagus at the beginning of the procedure.
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) and 3D rotational angiography (3DRA) of the left atrium (LA) are used to evaluate the esophagus prior to radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. The aim of this study was to compare preprocedural and periprocedural views of the esophagus and the left atrium. METHODS: From September 2011 to August 2012, 3DRA and CT of the LA were performed on 56 patients before they underwent catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. The 3DRA was performed periprocedurally, and the CT was performed an average of 20 days prior to the procedure. 3D models of the LA and the esophagus were then segmented on the EP Navigator V 3.1 workstation. Five positions of the esophagus, A-E, in order from left to right, were evaluated. RESULTS: The most common position of the esophagus was behind the left part of the LA (CT, position B (n = 26)) and behind the central part of the LA (3DRA, position C (n = 21)). The maximum shift of the esophagus was three positions, and the average shift was 0.857 ± 0.766 of a position. There was a shift of one position in 44.6 % of the patients, two positions in 17.9 %, and three positions in 1.8 %. A statistically significant difference was found between the positions of the esophagus when the 3DRA and CT evaluations were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The most common position of the esophagus was behind the middle and left part of the LA. The outpatient views of the esophagus obtained before ablation did not reflect the position of the esophagus at the beginning of the procedure.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D rotational angiography of the left atrium; Atrial fibrillation; Atrioesophageal fistula; Catheter ablation of arrhythmias; Computer tomography of the heart; Esophagus imaging
Authors: Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Kristina Lemola; Jihn Han; Kamala Tamirisa; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Scott Reich; Aman Chugh; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hans Kottkamp; Christopher Piorkowski; Hildegard Tanner; Richard Kobza; Anja Dorszewski; Petra Schirdewahn; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Gerhard Hindricks Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2005-02
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Michael V Orlov; Peter Hoffmeister; G Muqtada Chaudhry; Ibrahim Almasry; Geert H M Gijsbers; Tammee Swack; Charles I Haffajee Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-10-13 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Christopher Piorkowski; Gerhard Hindricks; Doreen Schreiber; Hildegard Tanner; Wolfgang Weise; Alexander Koch; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Hans Kottkamp Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; L Gencel; V Pradeau; S Garrigues; S Chouairi; M Hocini; P Le Métayer; R Roudaut; J Clémenty Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 1996-12
Authors: Aravinda Thiagalingam; Robert Manzke; Andre D'Avila; Ivan Ho; Andrew H Locke; Jeremy N Ruskin; Raymond C Chan; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2007-11-12
Authors: M M D Molenaar; T Hesselink; M F Scholten; K Kraaier; D E Bouman; M Brusse-Keizer; Y J Stevenhagen; P F H M van Dessel; B Ten Haken; J G Grandjean; J M van Opstal Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 2.380