Literature DB >> 26971186

How Can We Improve Retention of the First-Time Donor? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence.

Kathleen L Bagot1, Andrea L Murray2, Barbara M Masser3.   

Abstract

Blood products are critical to health systems and donations by voluntary nonremunerated donors are recommended. Worldwide, however, only around 5% of those eligible to donate do so and around half of those never return to donate again. This review focuses on what deters first-time donors, what predicts their retention, and what interventions may promote retention of this group. A comprehensive search of relevant databases identified 9 studies investigating motives and deterrents of first-time donors, 14 studies investigating predictors for first-time donors (13 whole blood [WB] and 2 plasmapheresis), and 15 studies (in 14 published articles) detailing interventions conducted on first-time donors. Drawing on an established blood donation taxonomy, studies were classified by 2 independent raters. Interventions were also classified into traditional, behavioral, or social science interventions. With only 2 eligible studies among first-time plasmapheresis donors, analyses focused on WB donors. First-time WB donors reported benevolent and collectivistic motivations, as well as personal benefits to commence WB donation. Self-reported deterrents have typically not been examined. Intention predicted first-time donor retention with intention determined by attitudes and a sense of (perceived behavioral) control. However, anxiety, adverse events, and deferrals all deterred retention. Traditional interventions, such as reminders and incentives, are widespread yet had only a small effect on return of first-time donors. Although behavioral science interventions such as fluid loading are effective, the strongest effect for the return of first-time donors was found when individual psychological support was provided. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the factors associated with the commencement and continuation of first WB donations. The current review revealed that self-reported motivators are typically not effective, and most successful predictive factors identified have not been translated into interventions. Future work would do well to identify, manage, and meet donors' expectations along with developing more individualized donation experiences. Blood donor research should delineate donor career stages; addressing first-time donor retention will support stable panels for blood collection agencies.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  First-time donor; Intervention; Retention; Whole blood donation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971186     DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Rev        ISSN: 0887-7963


  17 in total

1.  Motivation structures of blood donation: a means-end chain approach.

Authors:  Yeong Sheng Tey; Poppy Arsil; Mark Brindal; Sook Kuan Lee; Chi Teen Teoh
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2019-06-24

Review 2.  Selecting the Right Donors - Still a Challenge: Development of a Uniform Donor Questionnaire in Germany.

Authors:  Ruth Offergeld; Margarethe Heiden
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 3.747

3.  A motivational interview promotes retention of blood donors with high internal motivation.

Authors:  Christopher R France; Janis L France; Bruce W Carlson; Lina K Himawan; Debra A Kessler; Mark Rebosa; Beth H Shaz; Katrala Madden; Patricia M Carey; P Maxwell Slepian; Brett Ankawi; Irina E Livitz; Kristen R Fox
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood.

Authors:  Barbara Masser; Eamonn Ferguson; Eva-Maria Merz; Lisa Williams
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  Nucleic acid testing identifies high prevalence of blood borne viruses among approved blood donors in Mozambique.

Authors:  Nédio Mabunda; Orvalho Augusto; Ana Flora Zicai; Ana Duajá; Sandra Oficiano; Nalia Ismael; Adolfo Vubil; Tufária Mussá; Milton Moraes; Ilesh Jani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  How do people become plasma and platelet donors in a VNR context?

Authors:  Johanne Charbonneau; Marie-Soleil Cloutier; Balia Fainstein
Journal:  J Clin Apher       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Blood donation from 2006 to 2015 in Zhejiang Province, China: annual consecutive cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  Wei Hu; Hongdao Meng; Qiuyue Hu; Lijuan Feng; Xianguo Qu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effective methods for reactivating inactive blood donors: a stratified randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Jian Ou-Yang; Chun-Hua Bei; Hua-Qin Liang; Bo He; Jin-Yan Chen; Yong-Shui Fu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Determinants of blood donation willingness in the European Union: a cross-country perspective on perceived transfusion safety, concerns, and incentives.

Authors:  Elisabeth M J Huis In 't Veld; Wim L A M de Kort; Eva-Maria Merz
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  A prospective study on COVID-19 convalescent plasma donor (CCP) recruitment strategies in a resource constrained blood centre.

Authors:  Durba Biswas; Chikam Maiti; Biplabendu Talukder; Md Azharuddin; Sayantan Saha; Sumita Pandey; Arijit Das; Setu Das Adhikari; Yogiraj Ray; Biswanath S Sarkar; Sekhar R Paul; Bibhuti Saha; Sandip Paul; Shilpak Chatterjee; Dipyaman Ganguly; Prasun Bhattacharya
Journal:  ISBT Sci Ser       Date:  2021-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.