Literature DB >> 26971110

Visual-palpatory versus fluoroscopic intraoperative determination of the femoral entry point in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

R Herschel1, A Hasler2, P M Tscholl2, S F Fucentese2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Malpositioning of the femoral entry point in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can lead to abnormal and painful patellar kinematics and loss of flexion. Determination of this point is usually performed by palpation of anatomic landmarks. Accuracy of this method has not yet been investigated. The hypotheses were: 1. palpatory method is not as accurate as fluoroscopically guided method using established radiological criteria; 2. accuracy correlates with surgical experience.
METHODS: Three surgeons of varying experience defined the femoral entry point for the MPFL by palpation in ten cadaveric legs. The blinded procedures were repeated three times, and subjective difficulty of the determination was recorded. Results were documented by fluoroscopy on a true lateral radiograph. The accuracy was assessed using established radiological criteria. Surgical experience was correlated with the results, and confounding or interacting variables were assessed.
RESULTS: Mean deviation from the correct zone for the femoral entry point was 3.5 mm (range 0-18 mm). Twenty-nine percent of all palpatory determinations were inside the correct zone, 47 % were within 5 mm distance from the correct zone, and 23 % were further than 5 mm apart from the correct zone ("outliers"). No significant difference was found between surgeons of varying experience. No correlation was observed between subjective difficulty of the procedure and accuracy of determination.
CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the isolated palpatory determination of the femoral entry point in MPFL reconstruction seems to be insufficient, regardless of surgical experience. Derived from this study, fluoroscopic guidance is used in our clinic by default.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Femoral entry point; MPFL; Reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971110     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4057-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  26 in total

1.  [Supplement to the conservation of an entire cadaver according to W. Thiel].

Authors:  Walter Thiel
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  The anatomy and isometry of the medial patellofemoral ligament: implications for reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert N Steensen; Ryan M Dopirak; William G McDonald
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Anatomical study of the medial patello-femoral ligament: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony Viste; Florian Chatelet; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures.

Authors:  Coen A Wijdicks; Chad J Griffith; Robert F LaPrade; Steinar Johansen; Adam Sunderland; Elizabeth A Arendt; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Morphology of the femoral insertion site of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  Kotaro Fujino; Goro Tajima; Jun Yan; Youichi Kamei; Moritaka Maruyama; Sanjuro Takeda; Shuhei Kikuchi; Tadashi Shimamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for treatment of patellofemoral instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Constantinus F M Buckens; Daniël B F Saris
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sports.

Authors:  Sabine Lippacher; Jens Dreyhaupt; Sean R M Williams; Heiko Reichel; Manfred Nelitz
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Shape and size of the medial patellofemoral ligament for the best surgical reconstruction: a human cadaveric study.

Authors:  G Placella; M M Tei; E Sebastiani; G Criscenti; A Speziali; C Mazzola; A Georgoulis; G Cerulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Graft length change and radiographic assessment of femoral drill hole position for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomohiko Tateishi; Masamitsu Tsuchiya; Naoya Motosugi; Shintaro Asahina; Hiroo Ikeda; Sadahiro Cho; Takeshi Muneta
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in patients with recurrent patella instability.

Authors:  Ditte Enderlein; Torsten Nielsen; Svend Erik Christiansen; Peter Faunø; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intraoperative fluoroscopy during MPFL reconstruction improves the accuracy of the femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  P Koenen; S Shafizadeh; T R Pfeiffer; A Wafaisade; B Bouillon; A C Kanakamedala; V Jaecker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Clinical outcomes after revision surgery for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Chatterton; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Ole Gade Sørensen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Effective patellofemoral joint stabilization and low complication rates using a hardware-free MPFL reconstruction technique with an intra-operative adjustment of the graft tension.

Authors:  Lars V von Engelhardt; Torsten Fuchs; Pia Weskamp; Joerg Jerosch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Dual Patella Docking Technique.

Authors:  Hassan Azimi; Oke Anakwenze
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-06

5.  Validity of intraoperative observation of graft length change pattern for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hiroki Katagiri; Kazumasa Miyatake; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masafumi Horie; Ichiro Sekiya; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-24

Review 6.  [Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Yanlin Li; Dejian Liu; Guoliang Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-15

7.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Femoral Tunnel Accuracy: Relationship to Disease-Specific Quality of Life.

Authors:  Laurie A Hiemstra; Sarah Kerslake; Mark Lafave
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-02-07

8.  Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study.

Authors:  Xuancheng Zhang; Guoming Xie; Chengyuan Zhang; Zhaoyi Fang; Jinzhong Zhao; Xiaoqiao Huangfu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Influence of the Fluoroscopy Setting towards the Patient When Identifying the MPFL Insertion Point.

Authors:  Alexander Korthaus; Tobias Dust; Markus Berninger; Jannik Frings; Matthias Krause; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Grégoire Thürig
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.