Literature DB >> 26971101

Self-Perceived Distress and Impairment in Problem Gamblers: A Study of Pre- to Post-treatment Measurement Invariance.

David Smith1, Richard Woodman2, Peter Harvey3, Malcolm Battersby3.   

Abstract

Gambling help services typically evaluate treatment outcomes using self-reported responses and measurements. However, gamblers' conceptualisations and prioritisations with respect to these measurements may shift over time. Thus, changes in the self-reported responses may not always reflect true change in the individuals. This study investigated for response shift in self-report measures of psychological distress and impairment in 293 help-seeking problem gamblers. We used confirmatory factor analysis to model data structures from pre-treatment to post-treatment. The findings indicated that a response shift had occurred. Two items became less important and one item became more important in measuring psychological distress. Measurement invariance was achieved for the complete set of items for impairment. These findings provide a more in-depth understanding of the nature of self-report outcomes in otherwise routinely collected data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive behavioural therapy; Measurement invariance; Problem gambling; Psychological distress; Work and social impairment

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26971101     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-016-9598-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  32 in total

1.  Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: a controlled study.

Authors:  Janice C Marceaux; Cameron L Melville
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2011-03

2.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  A framework for reporting outcomes in problem gambling treatment research: the Banff, Alberta Consensus.

Authors:  Michael Walker; Tony Toneatto; Marc N Potenza; Nancy Petry; Robert Ladouceur; David C Hodgins; Nady el-Guebaly; Enrique Echeburua; Alex Blaszczynski
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural interventions to reduce problem gambling: hedging our bets?

Authors:  Patricia Gooding; Nicholas Tarrier
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-04-17

5.  Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance.

Authors:  Adam W Meade; Emily C Johnson; Phillip W Braddy
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2008-05

6.  A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Nancy M Petry; Jeremiah Weinstock; David M Ledgerwood; Benjamin Morasco
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-04

7.  The three facets of the patient's history.

Authors:  Ami Schattner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Treatment of female pathological gambling: the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural approach.

Authors:  Nicki Dowling; David Smith; Trang Thomas
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2006-12

9.  Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Per Carlbring; Filip Smit
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-12

10.  A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Daniel Fu Keung Wong; Catherine Lai Ping Chung; Janet Wu; Joe Tang; Patrick Lau; Jennie Po Ching Wan
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Testing for response shift in treatment evaluation of change in self-reported psychopathology amongst secondary psychiatric care outpatients.

Authors:  Ingrid V E Carlier; Wessel A van Eeden; Kim de Jong; Erik J Giltay; Martijn S van Noorden; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis; Frans G Zitman; Henk Kelderman; Albert M van Hemert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.035

2.  Re-evaluating randomized clinical trials of psychological interventions: Impact of response shift on the interpretation of trial results.

Authors:  M G E Verdam; W van Ballegooijen; C J M Holtmaat; H Knoop; J Lancee; F J Oort; H Riper; A van Straten; I M Verdonck-de Leeuw; M de Wit; T van der Zweerde; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.