Literature DB >> 26970768

Histomorphometric and histologic evaluation of titanium-zirconium (aTiZr) implants with anodized surfaces.

Ajay Sharma1, A James McQuillan2, Yo Shibata3, Lavanya A Sharma4, John Neil Waddell5, Warwick John Duncan5.   

Abstract

The choice of implant surface has a significant influence on osseointegration. Modification of TiZr surface by anodization is reported to have the potential to modulate the osteoblast cell behaviour favouring more rapid bone formation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anodizing the surface of TiZr discs with respect to osseointegration after four weeks implantation in sheep femurs. Titanium (Ti) and TiZr discs were anodized in an electrolyte containing DL-α-glycerophosphate and calcium acetate at 300 V. The surface characteristics were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, electron dispersive spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy and goniometry. Forty implant discs with thickness of 1.5 and 10 mm diameter (10 of each-titanium, titanium-zirconium, anodized titanium and anodized titanium-zirconium) were placed in the femoral condyles of 10 sheep. Histomorphometric and histologic analysis were performed 4 weeks after implantation. The anodized implants displayed hydrophilic, porous, nano-to-micrometer scale roughened surfaces. Energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis revealed calcium and phosphorous incorporation into the surface of both titanium and titanium-zirconium after anodization. Histologically there was new bone apposition on all implanted discs, slightly more pronounced on anodised discs. The percentage bone-to-implant contact measurements of anodized implants were higher than machined/unmodified implants but there was no significant difference between the two groups with anodized surfaces (P > 0.05, n = 10). The present histomorphometric and histological findings confirm that surface modification of titanium-zirconium by anodization is similar to anodised titanium enhances early osseointegration compared to machined implant surfaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970768     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-016-5695-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  32 in total

1.  The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing.

Authors:  John E Davies
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo.

Authors:  Thomas J Webster; Jeremiah U Ejiofor
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  An experimental comparison of two different clinically used implant designs and surfaces.

Authors:  Jan Gottlow; Sargon Barkarmo; Lars Sennerby
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2.

Authors:  Gabriel Colon; Brian C Ward; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants.

Authors:  Young-Taeg Sul; Carina Johansson; Eungsun Byon; Tomas Albrektsson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  The influence of surface energy of titanium-zirconium alloy on osteoblast cell functions in vitro.

Authors:  Subhash Sista; Cui'e Wen; Peter D Hodgson; Gopal Pande
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.396

8.  Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone. An experimental study in the dog.

Authors:  Daniele Botticelli; Tord Berglundh; Jan Lindhe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Periodontal repair in surgically created intrabony defects in dogs: influence of the number of bone walls on healing response.

Authors:  Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Jung-Kiu Chai; Kyoo-Sung Cho; Ik-Sang Moon; Ulf M E Wikesjö; Chong-Kwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Antibacterial titanium plate anodized by being discharged in NaCl solution exhibits cell compatibility.

Authors:  Y Shibata; H Kawai; H Yamamoto; T Igarashi; T Miyazaki
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.116

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Implant-bone-interface: Reviewing the impact of titanium surface modifications on osteogenic processes in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Theresia Stich; Francisca Alagboso; Tomáš Křenek; Tomáš Kovářík; Volker Alt; Denitsa Docheva
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-12

2.  Is titanium-zirconium alloy a better alternative to pure titanium for oral implant? Composition, mechanical properties, and microstructure analysis.

Authors:  Ajay Sharma; John N Waddell; Kai C Li; Lavanya A Sharma; David J Prior; Warwick J Duncan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-08-29

3.  Zirconia versus Titanium Implants: 8-Year Follow-Up in a Patient Cohort Contrasted with Histological Evidence from a Preclinical Animal Model.

Authors:  Warwick J Duncan; Sunyoung Ma; Allauddin Siddiqi; Reham B Osman
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.748

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.