Literature DB >> 26970424

Comparison of amplitude-mode ultrasound versus air displacement plethysmography for assessing body composition changes following participation in a structured weight-loss programme in women.

Brad J Schoenfeld1, Alan A Aragon2, Jordan Moon3, James W Krieger4, Gul Tiryaki-Sonmez1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare body composition changes as measured by A-mode ultrasound (US) versus a criterion densitometry-based measure, air displacement plethysmography (ADP), over a 4-week weight-loss protocol in healthy, non-obese young women. Twenty healthy, young female volunteers were provided with customized dietary plans for the length of the study intended to facilitate a 500 calorie-a-day deficit. Subjects also performed 3 h a week of supervised aerobic exercise. Per cent fat mass and lean body mass were obtained via ADP and US both pre- and postintervention. Pretesting, post-testing and delta data for %fat resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y-intercept no different than zero (P<0·05). Similar to %fat values, pretesting, post-testing and delta data for fat-free mass resulted in no significant differences in mean values along with a slope of the regression line no different than one and a y-intercept no different than zero (P<0·05) with the exception of the delta for slope (0·39, P = 0·04). The current findings indicate that US can provide a similar degree of accuracy for tracking group-based fat loss in women compared to ADP. Given the low-cost relative to DXA and ADP, researchers and practitioners therefore can consider US as a viable option for monitoring group-based changes in body fat over time.
© 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; body composition; measurement; modality; technique

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970424     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  2 in total

1.  Utility of ultrasound for body fat assessment: validity and reliability compared to a multicompartment criterion.

Authors:  Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Malia N M Blue; Eric T Trexler; Katie R Hirsch
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.273

Review 2.  International society of sports nutrition position stand: diets and body composition.

Authors:  Alan A Aragon; Brad J Schoenfeld; Robert Wildman; Susan Kleiner; Trisha VanDusseldorp; Lem Taylor; Conrad P Earnest; Paul J Arciero; Colin Wilborn; Douglas S Kalman; Jeffrey R Stout; Darryn S Willoughby; Bill Campbell; Shawn M Arent; Laurent Bannock; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 5.150

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.