Literature DB >> 26970332

Acute and delayed response to resistance exercise leading or not leading to muscle failure.

Fernando Pareja-Blanco1, David Rodríguez-Rosell1, Luis Sánchez-Medina2, Juan Ribas-Serna3, Covadonga López-López4, Ricardo Mora-Custodio1, Juan Manuel Yáñez-García1, Juan José González-Badillo1.   

Abstract

This study compared the time course of recovery following two resistance exercise protocols differing in the number of repetitions per set with regard to the maximum possible (to failure) number. Ten men performed three sets of 6 versus 12 repetitions with their 70% 1RM (3 × 6 [12] versus 3 × 12 [12]) in the bench press (BP) and squat (SQ) exercises. Mechanical [CMJ height, velocity against the 1 m s-1 load (V1 -load)], biochemical [testosterone, cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, insulin-like growth factor-1, creatine kinase (CK)] and heart rate variability (HRV) and complexity (HRC) were assessed pre-, postexercise (Post) and at 6, 24 and 48 h-Post. Compared with 3 × 6 [12], the 3 × 12 [12] protocol resulted in significantly: higher repetition velocity loss within each set (BP: 65% versus 26%; SQ: 44% versus 20%); reduced V1 -load until 24 h-Post (BP) and 6 h-Post (SQ); decreased CMJ height up to 48 h-Post; greater increases in cortisol (Post), prolactin (Post, 48 h-Post) and CK (48 h-Post); and reductions in HRV and HRC at Post. This study shows that the mechanical, neuroendocrine and autonomic cardiovascular response is markedly different when manipulating the number of repetitions per set. Halving the number of repetitions in relation to the maximum number that can be completed serves to minimize fatigue and speed up recovery following resistance training.
© 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heart rate complexity; heart rate variability; hormonal response; neuromuscular fatigue; strength training; velocity-based resistance training

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970332     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  13 in total

1.  Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure.

Authors:  Ricardo Morán-Navarro; Carlos E Pérez; Ricardo Mora-Rodríguez; Ernesto de la Cruz-Sánchez; Juan José González-Badillo; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Jesús G Pallarés
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Training Monitoring in Sports: It Is Time to Embrace Cognitive Demand.

Authors:  Stéphane Perrey
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08

3.  Acute effects of equated volume-load resistance training leading to muscular failure versus non-failure on neuromuscular performance.

Authors:  Fabiano S Fonseca; Bruna Daniella de V Costa; Maria Elisa C Ferreira; Santiago Paes; Dalton de Lima-Junior; Witalo Kassiano; Edilson S Cyrino; Petrus Gantois; Leonardo S Fortes
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.103

4.  Heart Rate Variability Monitoring During Strength and High-Intensity Interval Training Overload Microcycles.

Authors:  Christoph Schneider; Thimo Wiewelhove; Christian Raeder; Andrew A Flatt; Olaf Hoos; Laura Hottenrott; Oliver Schumbera; Michael Kellmann; Tim Meyer; Mark Pfeiffer; Alexander Ferrauti
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Heart Rate Variability, Neuromuscular and Perceptual Recovery Following Resistance Training.

Authors:  Andrew A Flatt; Liam Globensky; Evan Bass; Brooke L Sapp; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18

6.  Effects of a 12-week resistance and aerobic exercise program on muscular strength and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: Study protocol for the EFICAN randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Alberto Soriano-Maldonado; Álvaro Carrera-Ruiz; David M Díez-Fernández; Alba Esteban-Simón; Mercedes Maldonado-Quesada; Nuria Moreno-Poza; María Del Mar García-Martínez; Celia Alcaraz-García; Rosa Vázquez-Sousa; Herminia Moreno-Martos; Antonio Toro-de-Federico; Nur Hachem-Salas; Eva Artés-Rodríguez; Manuel A Rodríguez-Pérez; Antonio J Casimiro-Andújar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Resistance Exercise Intensity Does Not Influence Neurotrophic Factors Response in Equated Volume Schemes.

Authors:  Leandro Lodo; Alexandre Moreira; Reury Frank P Bacurau; Carol D Capitani; Wesley P Barbosa; Marcelo Massa; Brad J Schoenfeld; Marcelo S Aoki
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.193

9.  The "Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology" Journal Club Series: Resistance Training.

Authors:  Antonio Paoli; Tatiana Moro; Silvio Lorenzetti; Jan Seiler; Fabian Lüthy; Micah Gross; Federico Roggio; Helmi Chaabene; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  J Funct Morphol Kinesiol       Date:  2020-04-02

10.  Time Course of Recovery Following Resistance Exercise with Different Loading Magnitudes and Velocity Loss in the Set.

Authors:  Fernando Pareja-Blanco; Antonio Villalba-Fernández; Pedro J Cornejo-Daza; Juan Sánchez-Valdepeñas; Juan José González-Badillo
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.