Arkady Korotinsky1,2, Samson Z Assefa1, Montserrat Diaz-Abad1, Emerson M Wickwire1, Steven M Scharf3. 1. Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland, 100 N Greene Street, 2nd Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, David Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90073, USA. 3. Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Maryland, 100 N Greene Street, 2nd Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. sscharf@medicine.umaryland.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an important clinical condition. Eligibility for treatment usually depends on disease severity, measured as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), equal to the sum of apneas plus hypopneas per hour of sleep. There is divergence on scoring rules for hypopneas between the recommendations of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and the Center for Medicare Services (CMS), the latter being more restrictive. Thus, patients could be eligible for treatment under AASM rules, but not under CMS rules. METHODS: Sleep laboratory records of 112 consecutive patients were reviewed (85 < 65, 27 ≥ 65 years old). AHI was calculated both by AASM and by CMS criteria. Information on demographics, and important comorbidities, was also reviewed. RESULTS: AHI was lower in younger patients using CMS criteria. However, differences in AHI using the two sets of criteria were not significantly different in the older patients. Incorporating all criteria for eligibility (severity, presence of certain comorbid conditions) for treatment, we found that fewer younger patients would be eligible using CMS criteria, but among the older patients, eligibility for treatment was the same whether AASM or CMS criteria were used. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CMS criteria for scoring hypopneas results in lower estimates of OSA severity, with fewer younger patients eligible for treatment. However, among Medicare age patients, the rate of treatment eligibility was the same whether AASM or CMS scoring rules were used.
BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an important clinical condition. Eligibility for treatment usually depends on disease severity, measured as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), equal to the sum of apneas plus hypopneas per hour of sleep. There is divergence on scoring rules for hypopneas between the recommendations of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) and the Center for Medicare Services (CMS), the latter being more restrictive. Thus, patients could be eligible for treatment under AASM rules, but not under CMS rules. METHODS: Sleep laboratory records of 112 consecutive patients were reviewed (85 < 65, 27 ≥ 65 years old). AHI was calculated both by AASM and by CMS criteria. Information on demographics, and important comorbidities, was also reviewed. RESULTS: AHI was lower in younger patients using CMS criteria. However, differences in AHI using the two sets of criteria were not significantly different in the older patients. Incorporating all criteria for eligibility (severity, presence of certain comorbid conditions) for treatment, we found that fewer younger patients would be eligible using CMS criteria, but among the older patients, eligibility for treatment was the same whether AASM or CMS criteria were used. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CMS criteria for scoring hypopneas results in lower estimates of OSA severity, with fewer younger patients eligible for treatment. However, among Medicare age patients, the rate of treatment eligibility was the same whether AASM or CMS scoring rules were used.
Entities:
Keywords:
American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Centers for Medicare Services; Hypopnea criteria; Sleep apnea
Authors: Marie Marklund; Bo Carlberg; Lars Forsgren; Tommy Olsson; Hans Stenlund; Karl A Franklin Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael Arzt; Terry Young; Laurel Finn; James B Skatrud; T Douglas Bradley Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ahmed S BaHammam; Amr Obeidat; Kashmira Barataman; Salman A Bahammam; Awad H Olaish; Munir M Sharif Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Michael R Littner; Max Hirshkowitz; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Brian Boehlecke; Terry M Brown; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Sheldon Kapen; Vishesh K Kapur; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer; Todd J Swick; Merrill S Wise Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Samuel T Kuna; Ruth Benca; Clete A Kushida; James Walsh; Magdy Younes; Bethany Staley; Alexandra Hanlon; Allan I Pack; Grace W Pien; Atul Malhotra Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Karin Gardner Johnson; Douglas Clark Johnson; Robert Joseph Thomas; Edward Feldmann; Peter K Lindenauer; Paul Visintainer; Meir H Kryger Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Richard B Berry; Alexandre R Abreu; Vidya Krishnan; Stuart F Quan; Patrick J Strollo; Raman K Malhotra Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Emerson M Wickwire; M Doyinsola Bailey; Virend K Somers; Mukta C Srivastava; Steven M Scharf; Abree M Johnson; Jennifer S Albrecht Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 4.324
Authors: Emerson M Wickwire; M Doyinsola Bailey; Virend K Somers; Liesl M Oldstone; Mukta C Srivastava; Abree M Johnson; Steven M Scharf; Jennifer S Albrecht Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 4.062