Literature DB >> 26969558

Neighborhood Context and Binge Drinking by Race and Ethnicity in New York City.

Preeti Chauhan1, Jennifer Ahern2, Sandro Galea3, Katherine M Keyes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neighborhood context is associated with binge drinking and has significant health, societal, and economic costs. Both binge drinking and neighborhood context vary by race and ethnicity. We examined the relations between neighborhood characteristics--neighborhood norms that are accepting of drunkenness, collective efficacy, and physical disorder--and binge drinking, with a focus on examining race and ethnic-specific relationships.
METHODS: Respondent data were collected through 2005 random digit-dial-telephone survey for a representative sample of New York City residents; neighborhood data were based on the 2005 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey. Participants were 1,415 past-year drinkers; Whites (n = 877), Blacks (n = 292), and Hispanics (n = 246). Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate population average models.
RESULTS: For the overall sample, neighborhood norms that were more accepting of drunkenness were associated with greater binge drinking (odds ratio [OR] = 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09, 1.37); collective efficacy and physical disorder were not significant. However, when examining this by race/ethnicity, greater collective efficacy (OR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.91) and greater physical disorder (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.62, 0.93) were associated with less binge drinking for Whites only. Neighborhood norms that were more accepting of drunkenness were associated with binge drinking among Whites (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.05, 1.38) and, while not significant (perhaps due to power), the associations were similar for Hispanics (OR = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.83, 1.68) and slightly lower for Blacks (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.67, 1.84).
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results suggest that neighborhood characteristics and binge drinking are shaped, in part, by factors that vary across race/ethnicity. Thus, disaggregating data by race/ethnicity is important in understanding binge drinking behaviors.
Copyright © 2016 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binge Drinking; Collective Efficacy; Ethnic Differences; Neighborhood Norms; Physical Disorder; Racial

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26969558      PMCID: PMC4851160          DOI: 10.1111/acer.13011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  52 in total

1.  Alcohol environments and disparities in exposure associated with adolescent drinking in California.

Authors:  Khoa Dang Truong; Roland Sturm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Racial differences in the relationship between alcohol consumption in early adulthood and occupational attainment at midlife.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Patrick S Malone; Stefan G Kertesz; Yang Wang; Philip R Costanzo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health.

Authors:  Alan E Hubbard; Jennifer Ahern; Nancy L Fleischer; Mark Van der Laan; Sheri A Lippman; Nicholas Jewell; Tim Bruckner; William A Satariano
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  The roles of outlet density and norms in alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer Ahern; Laura Balzer; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Neighborhood education inequality and drinking behavior.

Authors:  Félice Lê; Jennifer Ahern; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Situational norms for drinking and drunkenness: trends in the US adult population, 1979-1990.

Authors:  T K Greenfield; R Room
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Binge drinking by gender and race/ethnicity among California adults, 2007/2009.

Authors:  Jim E Banta; Pamela E Mukaire; Mark G Haviland
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.829

8.  Birth cohort effects on adolescent alcohol use: the influence of social norms from 1976 to 2007.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald G Bachman; Guohua Li; Deborah Hasin
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2012-12

9.  Neighborhood smoking norms modify the relation between collective efficacy and smoking behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer Ahern; Sandro Galea; Alan Hubbard; S Leonard Syme
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Binge drinking among US adults.

Authors:  Timothy S Naimi; Robert D Brewer; Ali Mokdad; Clark Denny; Mary K Serdula; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Limiting Alcohol Outlet Density to Prevent Alcohol Use and Violence: Estimating Policy Interventions Through Agent-Based Modeling.

Authors:  Alvaro Castillo-Carniglia; Veronica A Pear; Melissa Tracy; Katherine M Keyes; Magdalena Cerdá
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Gentrification and binge drinking in California neighborhoods: It matters how long you've lived there.

Authors:  Jacob M Izenberg; Mahasin S Mujahid; Irene H Yen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Space and Place in Alcohol Research.

Authors:  Christina Mair; Jessica Frankeberger; Paul J Gruenewald; Christopher N Morrison; Bridget Freisthler
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Availability, Promotion, and Signs of Alcohol Consumption: A Mixed Methods Study of Perceived Exposure and Objective Measures.

Authors:  Andrea Pastor; Irene Molina de la Fuente; María Sandín Vázquez; Paloma Conde; Marina Bosque-Prous; Manuel Franco; Niamh Shortt; Xisca Sureda
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.