Literature DB >> 26969222

Remote Magnetic Navigation: A Focus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Philip Aagaard1, Andrea Natale2,3,4,5,6,7,8, David Briceno1, Hiroshi Nakagawa9, Sanghamitra Mohanty2, Carola Gianni2, J David Burkhardt2, Luigi DI Biase1,2,10,3.   

Abstract

VT ablation is based on percutaneous catheter insertion under fluoroscopic guidance to selectively destroy (i.e., ablate) myocardial tissue regions responsible for the initiation or propagation of ventricular arrhythmias. Although the last decade has witnessed a rapid evolution of ablation equipment and techniques, the control over catheter movement during manual ablation has remained largely unchanged. Moreover, the procedures are long, and require ergonomically unfavorable positions, which can lead to operator fatigue. In an attempt to overcome these constraints, several technical advancements, including remote magnetic navigation (RMN), have been developed. RMN utilizes a magnetic field to remotely manipulate specially designed soft-tip ablation catheters anywhere in the x, y, or z plane inside the patient's chest. RMN also facilitates titration of the contact force between the catheter and the myocardial tissue, which may reduce the risk of complications while ensuring adequate lesion formation. There are several non-randomized studies showing that RMN has similar efficacy to manual ablation, while complication rates and total radiation exposure appears to be lower. Although these data are promising, larger randomized studies are needed to prove that RMN is superior to manual ablation of VT.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stereotaxis; catheter ablation; remote magnetic navigation; ventricular tachycardia

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26969222     DOI: 10.1111/jce.12938

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  7 in total

1.  Remote magnetic navigation for ventricular ablation: did the machine win this round?

Authors:  J David Burkhardt
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of manual versus remote magnetic navigation for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

Authors:  Mohit K Turagam; Donita Atkins; Roderick Tung; Moussa Mansour; Jeremy Ruskin; Jie Cheng; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  The First Evaluation of Remote Magnetic Navigation-Guided Pediatric Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation.

Authors:  Anna M E Noten; Nawin L Ramdat Misier; Janneke A E Kammeraad; Sip Wijchers; Ingrid M Van Beynum; Michiel Dalinghaus; Thomas B Krasemann; Sing-Chien Yap; Natasja M S de Groot; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 1.838

4.  Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten; Zsuzsanna Kis; Ferdi Akca; Rohit Bhagwandien; Sip Wijchers; Sing-Chien Yap; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Introducing a novel catheter-tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety.

Authors:  Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten; Tamas Géczy; Sing-Chien Yap; Zsuzsanna Kis; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 6.  Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias.

Authors:  Antoine Da Costa; Jean Baptiste Guichard; Cécile Roméyer-Bouchard; Antoine Gerbay; Karl Isaaz
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-09-19

7.  Novel strategy of remote magnetic navigation-guided ablation for ventricular arrhythmias from right ventricle outflow tract.

Authors:  Yun Xie; Ao Liu; Qi Jin; Ning Zhang; Kangni Jia; Changjian Lin; Tianyou Ling; Kang Chen; Wenqi Pan; Liqun Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.