Naomi B Haas1, Judith Manola2, Robert G Uzzo3, Keith T Flaherty4, Christopher G Wood5, Christopher Kane6, Michael Jewett7, Janice P Dutcher8, Michael B Atkins9, Michael Pins10, George Wilding5, David Cella11, Lynne Wagner12, Surena Matin5, Timothy M Kuzel11, Wade J Sexton13, Yu-Ning Wong3, Toni K Choueiri2, Roberto Pili14, Igor Puzanov15, Manish Kohli16, Walter Stadler17, Michael Carducci18, Robert Coomes19, Robert S DiPaola20. 1. Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: naomi.haas@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 5. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 6. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 7. Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. 8. Cancer Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA. 9. Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA. 10. University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 11. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 12. Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC, USA. 13. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA. 14. Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. 15. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 16. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 17. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 18. Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA. 19. Cancer Research Patient Advocate, Atlanta, GA, USA. 20. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Renal-cell carcinoma is highly vascular, and proliferates primarily through dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. We tested sunitinib and sorafenib, two oral anti-angiogenic agents that are effective in advanced renal-cell carcinoma, in patients with resected local disease at high risk for recurrence. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients at 226 study centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients had pathological stage high-grade T1b or greater with completely resected non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and adequate cardiac, renal, and hepatic function. Patients were stratified by recurrence risk, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and surgical approach, and computerised double-blind randomisation was done centrally with permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg per day orally throughout the first 4 weeks of each 6 week cycle, sorafenib 400 mg twice per day orally throughout each cycle, or placebo. Placebo could be sunitinib placebo given continuously for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle or sorafenib placebo given twice per day throughout the study. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival between each experimental group and placebo in the intention-to-treat population. All treated patients with at least one follow-up assessment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898. FINDINGS: Between April 24, 2006, and Sept 1, 2010, 1943 patients from the National Clinical Trials Network were randomly assigned to sunitinib (n=647), sorafenib (n=649), or placebo (n=647). Following high rates of toxicity-related discontinuation after 1323 patients had enrolled (treatment discontinued by 193 [44%] of 438 patients on sunitinib, 199 [45%] of 441 patients on sorafenib), the starting dose of each drug was reduced and then individually titrated up to the original full doses. On Oct 16, 2014, because of low conditional power for the primary endpoint, the ECOG-ACRIN Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that blinded follow-up cease and the results be released. The primary analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival. Median disease-free survival was 5·8 years (IQR 1·6-8·2) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 97·5% CI 0·85-1·23, p=0·8038), 6·1 years (IQR 1·7-not estimable [NE]) for sorafenib (HR 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·80-1·17, p=0·7184), and 6·6 years (IQR 1·5-NE) for placebo. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (105 [17%] patients on sunitinib and 102 [16%] patients on sorafenib), hand-foot syndrome (94 [15%] patients on sunitinib and 208 [33%] patients on sorafenib), rash (15 [2%] patients on sunitinib and 95 [15%] patients on sorafenib), and fatigue 110 [18%] patients on sunitinib [corrected]. There were five deaths related to treatment or occurring within 30 days of the end of treatment; one patient receiving sorafenib died from infectious colitis while on treatment and four patients receiving sunitinib died, with one death due to each of neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression. Revised dosing still resulted in high toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant treatment with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or sunitinib showed no survival benefit relative to placebo in a definitive phase 3 study. Furthermore, substantial treatment discontinuation occurred because of excessive toxicity, despite dose reductions. These results provide a strong rationale against the use of these drugs for high-risk kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting and suggest that the biology of cancer recurrence might be independent of angiogenesis. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Pfizer, and Bayer.
BACKGROUND: Renal-cell carcinoma is highly vascular, and proliferates primarily through dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. We tested sunitinib and sorafenib, two oral anti-angiogenic agents that are effective in advanced renal-cell carcinoma, in patients with resected local disease at high risk for recurrence. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients at 226 study centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients had pathological stage high-grade T1b or greater with completely resected non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and adequate cardiac, renal, and hepatic function. Patients were stratified by recurrence risk, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and surgical approach, and computerised double-blind randomisation was done centrally with permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg per day orally throughout the first 4 weeks of each 6 week cycle, sorafenib 400 mg twice per day orally throughout each cycle, or placebo. Placebo could be sunitinib placebo given continuously for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle or sorafenib placebo given twice per day throughout the study. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival between each experimental group and placebo in the intention-to-treat population. All treated patients with at least one follow-up assessment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898. FINDINGS: Between April 24, 2006, and Sept 1, 2010, 1943 patients from the National Clinical Trials Network were randomly assigned to sunitinib (n=647), sorafenib (n=649), or placebo (n=647). Following high rates of toxicity-related discontinuation after 1323 patients had enrolled (treatment discontinued by 193 [44%] of 438 patients on sunitinib, 199 [45%] of 441 patients on sorafenib), the starting dose of each drug was reduced and then individually titrated up to the original full doses. On Oct 16, 2014, because of low conditional power for the primary endpoint, the ECOG-ACRIN Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that blinded follow-up cease and the results be released. The primary analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival. Median disease-free survival was 5·8 years (IQR 1·6-8·2) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 97·5% CI 0·85-1·23, p=0·8038), 6·1 years (IQR 1·7-not estimable [NE]) for sorafenib (HR 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·80-1·17, p=0·7184), and 6·6 years (IQR 1·5-NE) for placebo. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (105 [17%] patients on sunitinib and 102 [16%] patients on sorafenib), hand-foot syndrome (94 [15%] patients on sunitinib and 208 [33%] patients on sorafenib), rash (15 [2%] patients on sunitinib and 95 [15%] patients on sorafenib), and fatigue 110 [18%] patients on sunitinib [corrected]. There were five deaths related to treatment or occurring within 30 days of the end of treatment; one patient receiving sorafenib died from infectious colitis while on treatment and four patients receiving sunitinib died, with one death due to each of neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression. Revised dosing still resulted in high toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant treatment with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or sunitinib showed no survival benefit relative to placebo in a definitive phase 3 study. Furthermore, substantial treatment discontinuation occurred because of excessive toxicity, despite dose reductions. These results provide a strong rationale against the use of these drugs for high-risk kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting and suggest that the biology of cancer recurrence might be independent of angiogenesis. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Pfizer, and Bayer.
Authors: Hans J Hammers; Henk M Verheul; Brenda Salumbides; Rajni Sharma; Michelle Rudek; Janneke Jaspers; Preeti Shah; Leigh Ellis; Li Shen; Silvia Paesante; Karl Dykema; Kyle Furge; Bin T Teh; George Netto; Roberto Pili Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-05-25 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-01-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David R Spigel; John D Hainsworth; Denise A Yardley; Eric Raefsky; Jeffrey Patton; Nancy Peacock; Cindy Farley; Howard A Burris; F Anthony Greco Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-04-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John M L Ebos; Christina R Lee; James G Christensen; Anthony J Mutsaers; Robert S Kerbel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Brian I Rini; Susan Halabi; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Walter M Stadler; Daniel A Vaena; San-San Ou; Laura Archer; James N Atkins; Joel Picus; Piotr Czaykowski; Janice Dutcher; Eric J Small Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rachel Schor-Bardach; David C Alsop; Ivan Pedrosa; Stephanie A Solazzo; Xiaoen Wang; Robert P Marquis; Michael B Atkins; Meredith Regan; Sabina Signoretti; Robert E Lenkinski; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: John M L Ebos; Christina R Lee; William Cruz-Munoz; Georg A Bjarnason; James G Christensen; Robert S Kerbel Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2009-03-03 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Cora N Sternberg; Ian D Davis; Jozef Mardiak; Cezary Szczylik; Eunsik Lee; John Wagstaff; Carlos H Barrios; Pamela Salman; Oleg A Gladkov; Alexander Kavina; Juan J Zarbá; Mei Chen; Lauren McCann; Lini Pandite; Debasish F Roychowdhury; Robert E Hawkins Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Brian I Rini; Darrel P Cohen; Dongrui R Lu; Isan Chen; Subramanian Hariharan; Martin E Gore; Robert A Figlin; Michael S Baum; Robert J Motzer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Riley A Hampsch; Jason D Wells; Nicole A Traphagen; Charlotte F McCleery; Jennifer L Fields; Kevin Shee; Lloye M Dillon; Darcy B Pooler; Lionel D Lewis; Eugene Demidenko; Yina H Huang; Jonathan D Marotti; Abigail E Goen; William B Kinlaw; Todd W Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Cedric Lebacle; Aydin Pooli; Thomas Bessede; Jacques Irani; Allan J Pantuck; Alexandra Drakaki Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Benjamin T Ristau; Judi Manola; Naomi B Haas; Daniel Y C Heng; Edward M Messing; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Naomi B Haas; Frede Donskov; Marine Gross-Goupil; Sergei Varlamov; Evgeny Kopyltsov; Jae Lyun Lee; Bohuslav Melichar; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri; Milada Zemanova; Lori A Wood; M Neil Reaume; Arnulf Stenzl; Simon Chowdhury; Ho Yeong Lim; Ray McDermott; Agnieszka Michael; Weichao Bao; Marlene J Carrasco-Alfonso; Paola Aimone; Maurizio Voi; Christian Doehn; Paul Russo; Cora N Sternberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 44.544