Literature DB >> 26969090

Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Naomi B Haas1, Judith Manola2, Robert G Uzzo3, Keith T Flaherty4, Christopher G Wood5, Christopher Kane6, Michael Jewett7, Janice P Dutcher8, Michael B Atkins9, Michael Pins10, George Wilding5, David Cella11, Lynne Wagner12, Surena Matin5, Timothy M Kuzel11, Wade J Sexton13, Yu-Ning Wong3, Toni K Choueiri2, Roberto Pili14, Igor Puzanov15, Manish Kohli16, Walter Stadler17, Michael Carducci18, Robert Coomes19, Robert S DiPaola20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal-cell carcinoma is highly vascular, and proliferates primarily through dysregulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway. We tested sunitinib and sorafenib, two oral anti-angiogenic agents that are effective in advanced renal-cell carcinoma, in patients with resected local disease at high risk for recurrence.
METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients at 226 study centres in the USA and Canada. Eligible patients had pathological stage high-grade T1b or greater with completely resected non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and adequate cardiac, renal, and hepatic function. Patients were stratified by recurrence risk, histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, and surgical approach, and computerised double-blind randomisation was done centrally with permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 54 weeks of sunitinib 50 mg per day orally throughout the first 4 weeks of each 6 week cycle, sorafenib 400 mg twice per day orally throughout each cycle, or placebo. Placebo could be sunitinib placebo given continuously for 4 weeks of every 6 week cycle or sorafenib placebo given twice per day throughout the study. The primary objective was to compare disease-free survival between each experimental group and placebo in the intention-to-treat population. All treated patients with at least one follow-up assessment were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00326898.
FINDINGS: Between April 24, 2006, and Sept 1, 2010, 1943 patients from the National Clinical Trials Network were randomly assigned to sunitinib (n=647), sorafenib (n=649), or placebo (n=647). Following high rates of toxicity-related discontinuation after 1323 patients had enrolled (treatment discontinued by 193 [44%] of 438 patients on sunitinib, 199 [45%] of 441 patients on sorafenib), the starting dose of each drug was reduced and then individually titrated up to the original full doses. On Oct 16, 2014, because of low conditional power for the primary endpoint, the ECOG-ACRIN Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended that blinded follow-up cease and the results be released. The primary analysis showed no significant differences in disease-free survival. Median disease-free survival was 5·8 years (IQR 1·6-8·2) for sunitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 1·02, 97·5% CI 0·85-1·23, p=0·8038), 6·1 years (IQR 1·7-not estimable [NE]) for sorafenib (HR 0·97, 97·5% CI 0·80-1·17, p=0·7184), and 6·6 years (IQR 1·5-NE) for placebo. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were hypertension (105 [17%] patients on sunitinib and 102 [16%] patients on sorafenib), hand-foot syndrome (94 [15%] patients on sunitinib and 208 [33%] patients on sorafenib), rash (15 [2%] patients on sunitinib and 95 [15%] patients on sorafenib), and fatigue 110 [18%] patients on sunitinib [corrected]. There were five deaths related to treatment or occurring within 30 days of the end of treatment; one patient receiving sorafenib died from infectious colitis while on treatment and four patients receiving sunitinib died, with one death due to each of neurological sequelae, sequelae of gastric perforation, pulmonary embolus, and disease progression. Revised dosing still resulted in high toxicity.
INTERPRETATION: Adjuvant treatment with the VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or sunitinib showed no survival benefit relative to placebo in a definitive phase 3 study. Furthermore, substantial treatment discontinuation occurred because of excessive toxicity, despite dose reductions. These results provide a strong rationale against the use of these drugs for high-risk kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting and suggest that the biology of cancer recurrence might be independent of angiogenesis. FUNDING: US National Cancer Institute and ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, Pfizer, and Bayer.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26969090      PMCID: PMC4878938          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  29 in total

1.  Reversible epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquired resistance to sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a xenograft study.

Authors:  Hans J Hammers; Henk M Verheul; Brenda Salumbides; Rajni Sharma; Michelle Rudek; Janneke Jaspers; Preeti Shah; Leigh Ellis; Li Shen; Silvia Paesante; Karl Dykema; Kyle Furge; Bin T Teh; George Netto; Roberto Pili
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bernard Escudier; Tim Eisen; Walter M Stadler; Cezary Szczylik; Stéphane Oudard; Michael Siebels; Sylvie Negrier; Christine Chevreau; Ewa Solska; Apurva A Desai; Frédéric Rolland; Tomasz Demkow; Thomas E Hutson; Martin Gore; Scott Freeman; Brian Schwartz; Minghua Shan; Ronit Simantov; Ronald M Bukowski
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Tracheoesophageal fistula formation in patients with lung cancer treated with chemoradiation and bevacizumab.

Authors:  David R Spigel; John D Hainsworth; Denise A Yardley; Eric Raefsky; Jeffrey Patton; Nancy Peacock; Cindy Farley; Howard A Burris; F Anthony Greco
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III study.

Authors:  Leonard B Saltz; Stephen Clarke; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Werner Scheithauer; Arie Figer; Ralph Wong; Sheryl Koski; Mikhail Lichinitser; Tsai-Shen Yang; Fernando Rivera; Felix Couture; Florin Sirzén; Jim Cassidy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Multiple circulating proangiogenic factors induced by sunitinib malate are tumor-independent and correlate with antitumor efficacy.

Authors:  John M L Ebos; Christina R Lee; James G Christensen; Anthony J Mutsaers; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa compared with interferon alfa monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: CALGB 90206.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Susan Halabi; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Walter M Stadler; Daniel A Vaena; San-San Ou; Laura Archer; James N Atkins; Joel Picus; Piotr Czaykowski; Janice Dutcher; Eric J Small
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Does arterial spin-labeling MR imaging-measured tumor perfusion correlate with renal cell cancer response to antiangiogenic therapy in a mouse model?

Authors:  Rachel Schor-Bardach; David C Alsop; Ivan Pedrosa; Stephanie A Solazzo; Xiaoen Wang; Robert P Marquis; Michael B Atkins; Meredith Regan; Sabina Signoretti; Robert E Lenkinski; S Nahum Goldberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  John M L Ebos; Christina R Lee; William Cruz-Munoz; Georg A Bjarnason; James G Christensen; Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Pazopanib in locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  Cora N Sternberg; Ian D Davis; Jozef Mardiak; Cezary Szczylik; Eunsik Lee; John Wagstaff; Carlos H Barrios; Pamela Salman; Oleg A Gladkov; Alexander Kavina; Juan J Zarbá; Mei Chen; Lauren McCann; Lini Pandite; Debasish F Roychowdhury; Robert E Hawkins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Darrel P Cohen; Dongrui R Lu; Isan Chen; Subramanian Hariharan; Martin E Gore; Robert A Figlin; Michael S Baum; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  163 in total

1.  AMPK Activation by Metformin Promotes Survival of Dormant ER+ Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Riley A Hampsch; Jason D Wells; Nicole A Traphagen; Charlotte F McCleery; Jennifer L Fields; Kevin Shee; Lloye M Dillon; Darcy B Pooler; Lionel D Lewis; Eugene Demidenko; Yina H Huang; Jonathan D Marotti; Abigail E Goen; William B Kinlaw; Todd W Miller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Epidemiology, biology and treatment of sarcomatoid RCC: current state of the art.

Authors:  Cedric Lebacle; Aydin Pooli; Thomas Bessede; Jacques Irani; Allan J Pantuck; Alexandra Drakaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Kidney cancer: Rest ASSUREd, much can be learned from adjuvant studies in renal cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Renal-cell carcinoma in 2016: Advances in treatment - jostling for pole position.

Authors:  Laurence Albiges; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  ASSURE vs. S-TRAC: conflicting results of adjuvant treatments for kidney cancer in the era of targeted agents and genomics.

Authors:  Camillo Porta; Silvia Chiellino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

6.  Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Judi Manola; Naomi B Haas; Daniel Y C Heng; Edward M Messing; Christopher G Wood; Christopher J Kane; Robert S DiPaola; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Nieves Martinez Chanza; Abhishek Tripathi; Lauren C Harshman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03

Review 8.  Evolving Treatment Paradigm in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  David M Gill; Neeraj Agarwal; Ulka Vaishampayan
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

9.  Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert J Motzer; Naomi B Haas; Frede Donskov; Marine Gross-Goupil; Sergei Varlamov; Evgeny Kopyltsov; Jae Lyun Lee; Bohuslav Melichar; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri; Milada Zemanova; Lori A Wood; M Neil Reaume; Arnulf Stenzl; Simon Chowdhury; Ho Yeong Lim; Ray McDermott; Agnieszka Michael; Weichao Bao; Marlene J Carrasco-Alfonso; Paola Aimone; Maurizio Voi; Christian Doehn; Paul Russo; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Adjuvant sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A cautionary comment of STORM trial.

Authors:  Jian-Hong Zhong; Xue-Ke Du; Bang-De Xiang; Le-Qun Li
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.