Deborah Lynn Reas1, Kristin Stedal1, Camilla Lindvall Dahlgren1, Øyvind Rø1,2. 1. Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Regional Department for Eating Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 2. Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) is a self-report measure of impairment secondary to eating disorder (ED) features. The purpose of this study was to identify the global CIA cut-off score that maximized sensitivity and specificity to discriminate impairment due to eating disorder pathology in a community versus clinical ED sample using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. METHOD: Participants were 1,468 female community participants and 552 eating disorder patients. RESULTS: Mean global CIA scores were 5.17 (SD 7.61) and 32.50 (SD 10.20). The ROC analysis demonstrated excellent accuracy of the global CIA score (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). A cut-off score of 16.0 yielded a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to replicate findings from the original development study of the CIA and lends support to initial recommendations. Data provide strong evidence of the discriminant validity of the CIA and suggest the utility of assessing eating-disorder related impairment for classification purposes.
OBJECTIVE: The Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) is a self-report measure of impairment secondary to eating disorder (ED) features. The purpose of this study was to identify the global CIA cut-off score that maximized sensitivity and specificity to discriminate impairment due to eating disorder pathology in a community versus clinical ED sample using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. METHOD:Participants were 1,468 female community participants and 552 eating disorderpatients. RESULTS: Mean global CIA scores were 5.17 (SD 7.61) and 32.50 (SD 10.20). The ROC analysis demonstrated excellent accuracy of the global CIA score (AUC = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98). A cut-off score of 16.0 yielded a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93) and a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.93). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to replicate findings from the original development study of the CIA and lends support to initial recommendations. Data provide strong evidence of the discriminant validity of the CIA and suggest the utility of assessing eating-disorder related impairment for classification purposes.
Authors: Kendra R Becker; Ani C Keshishian; Rachel E Liebman; Kathryn A Coniglio; Shirley B Wang; Debra L Franko; Kamryn T Eddy; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Kara A Christensen; Kelsie T Forbush; Brianne N Richson; Marianna L Thomeczek; Victoria L Perko; Kayla Bjorlie; Kylie Christian; Joseph Ayres; Jennifer E Wildes; Sofia Mildrum Chana Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 5.791