Literature DB >> 26968432

Comparative data on the differentiation and growth of bone ornamentation in gnathostomes (Chordata: Vertebrata).

Vivian de Buffrénil1, François Clarac2, Aurore Canoville3, Michel Laurin1.   

Abstract

Bone ornamentation, in the form of rounded pits framed by a network of ridges, is a frequent feature among a great diversity of gnathostome taxa. However, the basic osteogenic processes controlling the differentiation and development of these reliefs remain controversial. The present study is a broad comparative survey of this question with the classical methods used in hard tissue histology and paleohistology. Distinct processes, unevenly distributed among taxa, are involved in the creation and growth of pits and ridges. The simplest one is mere differential growth between pit bottom (slow growth) and ridge top (faster growth). The involvement of several complex remodeling processes, with the local succession of resorption and reconstruction cycles, is frequent and occurs in all major gnathostome clades. Some broad, inclusive clades (e.g., Temnospondyli) display consistency in the mechanisms controlling ornamentation, whereas other clades (e.g., Actinopterygii) are characterized by the diversity of the mechanisms involved. If osteogenic mechanisms are taken into account, bone ornamentation should be considered as a character extremely prone to homoplasy. Maximum likelihood (ML) optimizations reveal that the plesiomorphic mechanism creating ornamentation is differential apposition rate over pits (slow growth) and ridges (faster growth). In some taxas e.g., temnospondyls vs lissamphibians or pseudosuchians, bone ornamentation is likely to be a homoplastic feature due to a convergence process driven by similar selective pressures. ML models of character evolution suggest that the presence of resorption in the development of ornamentation may be selectively advantageous, although support for this conclusion is only moderate.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone accretion; bone remodeling; dermal bone; histology; pits; ridges

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26968432     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.20525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  4 in total

1.  A new genus and species of frog from the Kem Kem (Morocco), the second neobatrachian from Cretaceous Africa.

Authors:  Alfred Lemierre; David C Blackburn
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.061

2.  Ontogenetic Change in the Temporal Region of the Early Permian Parareptile Delorhynchus cifellii and the Implications for Closure of the Temporal Fenestra in Amniotes.

Authors:  Yara Haridy; Mark J Macdougall; Diane Scott; Robert R Reisz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Cranial bone histology of Metoposaurus krasiejowensis (Amphibia, Temnospondyli) from the Late Triassic of Poland.

Authors:  Kamil Gruntmejer; Dorota Konietzko-Meier; Adam Bodzioch
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Evolution of hyperossification expands skull diversity in frogs.

Authors:  Daniel J Paluh; Edward L Stanley; David C Blackburn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.