| Literature DB >> 26968154 |
Claudia Munoz-Zanzi1,2, Christopher Campbell1, Sergey Berg3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Toxoplasmosis is a prevalent protozoan infection with a complex lifecycle and wide profile of risk factors. The impact of congenital infection is well documented; however, there is increasing evidence of a much broader range of potential health outcomes and the need to improve our understanding of the transmission patterns and infection sources in the overall population. This study examined the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in distinct community types from a highly endemic area of Chile.Entities:
Keywords: Toxoplasma gondii; epidemiology; risk factors; seroprevalence; spatial; toxoplasmosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 26968154 PMCID: PMC4788768 DOI: 10.3402/iee.v6.30597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Ecol Epidemiol ISSN: 2000-8686
Sociodemographic characteristics and living conditions of study participants by community type, Los Rios Region, Chile, 2010–2012
| Characteristics | Urban slum ( | Rural village ( | Farm ( | Total ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | 0.054 | ||||
| Male | 98 (36.6%) | 138 (45.5%) | 163 (44.9%) | 399 (42.7%) | |
| Female | 170 (63.4%) | 165 (54.5%) | 200 (55.1%) | 535 (57.3%) | |
| Age | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 34.0 (15.5) | 44.3 (18.8) | 45.1 (18.7) | 41.7 (18.5) | |
| Median (range) | 30.5 (13–94) | 44 (13–86) | 45 (13–94) | 40 (13–94) | |
| Education | <0.001 | ||||
| Elementary school | 127 (49.2%) | 173 (57.7%) | 199 (55.7%) | 499 (54.5%) | |
| High school | 128 (49.6%) | 108 (36.0%) | 120 (33.6%) | 356 (38.9%) | |
| College | 3 (1.2%) | 19 (6.3%) | 38 (10.7%) | 60 (6.6%) | |
| Monthly income (scaled) | <0.001 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 1.5 (0.7) | 2.1 (1.1) | 2.4 (1.6) | 2.0 (1.3) | |
| Median (range) | 1.4 (0.3–4.0) | 1.7 (0.6–6.0) | 2.0 (0.5–8.0) | 1.7 (0.3–8.0) | |
| Occupation | <0.001 | ||||
| Office environment | 29 (11.1%) | 43 (14.3%) | 22 (6.2%) | 94 (10.3%) | |
| Domestic environment | 184 (70.2%) | 187 (62.1%) | 173 (49.1%) | 544 (59.5%) | |
| Outdoor environment | 49 (18.7%) | 71 (23.6%) | 157 (44.6%) | 277 (30.2%) | |
| Working in garden | 30 (11.2%) | 92 (30.4%) | 159 (44.3%) | 281 (30.2%) | <0.001 |
| Cleaning barns | 83 (31.0%) | 112 (37.0%) | 145 (40.4%) | 340 (36.6%) | 0.052 |
| Cleaning drains | 20 (7.5%) | 6 (2.0%) | 20 (5.6%) | 46 (4.9%) | 0.008 |
| Water from open source | 3 (1.1%) | 18 (5.9%) | 62 (17.1%) | 83 (8.9%) | <0.001 |
| Storing household water | 84 (31.3%) | 45 (14.9%) | 87 (24.0%) | 216 (23.1%) | <0.001 |
| Always boiling water | 31 (11.6%) | 8 (2.6%) | 41 (11.3%) | 80 (8.6%) | <0.001 |
| Cats in household | 139 (51.9%) | 171 (56.4%) | 219 (60.8%) | 529 (56.8%) | 0.088 |
| Vegetables from household or community | 243 (90.7%) | 246 (81.2%) | 324 (89.3%) | 813 (87.0%) | <0.001 |
| Poultry from household or community | 30 (11.2%) | 109 (36.0%) | 208 (57.1%) | 347 (37.2%) | <0.001 |
| Pork from household or community | 32 (11.9%) | 103 (34.0%) | 191 (52.6%) | 326 (34.9%) | <0.001 |
| Sheep from household or community | 136 (50.7%) | 221 (72.9%) | 311 (85.7%) | 668 (71.5%) | <0.001 |
| Flow accumulation index | 0.008 | ||||
| Mean (SD) | 10.0 (10.0) | 3.4 (9.9) | 9.1 (37.7) | 7.5 (26.6) | |
| Median (range) | 1.0 (0, 76) | 0 (0, 72) | 0 (0, 310) | 0 (0, 310) | |
| Largest landscape cover | <0.001 | ||||
| Tree/shrub | 75 (28.0%) | 3 (1.0%) | 4 (1.1%) | 82 (8.8%) | |
| Field/low vegetation | 115 (42.9%) | 300 (99.0%) | 359 (98.9%) | 774 (82.9%) | |
| Wetland | 78 (29.1%) | – | – | 78 (8.4%) |
Missing data on 19 participants.
Scaled as monthly income in Chilean pesos/100,000. Value of 1 = US$160.
Occupation categories were defined as office environment (job outside the house in an office, indoor type of environment), domestic environment (job in the house, students, retirees), or outdoor environment (job in agriculture, forestry, construction, other outdoor type of job).
Missing data on four participants.
Supermarket, not locally obtained sources as the reference.
Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii seropositivity in people 13 years and older from Los Rios Region, Chile, obtained from multivariable regression modeling
| Variables in final models | Coefficient | S.E. |
| OR (95% C.I.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farm communities | ||||
| Sex: | −1.299 | 0.456 | 0.004 | – |
| Age (years) | 0.034 | 0.007 | <0.001 | 1.03 (1.02, 1.05) |
| Scaled monthly income | −0.437 | 0.122 | <0.001 | – |
| Cleaning barns | 0.549 | 0.261 | 0.035 | 1.73 (1.04, 2.89) |
| Always boils drinking water | −1.109 | 0.410 | 0.007 | 0.33 (0.15, 0.74) |
| Cats in the household | 0.466 | 0.281 | 0.098 | 1.59 (0.92, 2.76) |
| Sloped terrain, little vegetation 250 m radius (m2) | 0.202 | 0.126 | 0.110 | – |
| Scaled monthly income* Sex | 0.397 | 0.159 | 0.013 | |
| Scaled monthly income – Sex: | 0.96 (0.79, 1.26) | |||
| Scaled monthly income – Sex: | 0.65 (0.51, 0.82) | |||
| Rural villages | ||||
| Sex: | −3.653 | 0.269 | 0.405 | – |
| Age (years) | 0.027 | 0.007 | <0.001 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.04) |
| Scaled monthly income | −0.094 | 0.127 | 0.458 | – |
| Cleaning barns | 0.560 | 0.286 | 0.050 | 1.75 (1.00, 3.07) |
| Vegetables from household or community | 0.783 | 0.368 | 0.034 | 2.19 (1.06, 4.50) |
| Eating lamb/sheep | 2.074 | 0.865 | 0.017 | 7.96 (1.46, 43.34) |
| Flow accumulation index | 0.046 | 0.024 | 0.056 | 1.05 (1.00, 1.10) |
| Urban slum communities | ||||
| Sex: | −1.417 | 0.846 | 0.094 | – |
| Age (years) | 0.034 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.05) |
| Scaled monthly income | 0.642 | 0.212 | 0.002 | 1.84 (1.22, 2.79) |
| Occupation: | 0.007 | 0.564 | 0.991 | – |
| Outdoor environment | −1.305 | 1.264 | 0.302 | – |
| Sloped terrain, no vegetation 250 m radius (m2) | −0.056 | 0.035 | 0.035 | 0.93 (0.87, 0.99) |
| Sex * Occupation: Domestic environment | 1.615 | 0.939 | 0.085 | – |
| Sex * Occupation: Outdoor environment | 2.922 | 1.459 | 0.045 | – |
| Occupation: Domestic environment – Sex: Male | 5.63 (1.03, 19.76) | |||
| Occupation: Domestic environment – Sex: Female | 1.12 (0.37, 3.38) | |||
| Occupation: Outdoor environment – Sex: Male | 4.95 (1.23, 22.39) | |||
| Occupation: Outdoor environment – Sex: Female | 0.27 (0.02, 3.19) |
A separate final model was produced for each community type.
Income in Chilean pesos scaled as income/100,000.
Office or indoor type of occupation as the reference category.
Fig. 1Age-specific seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis in 934 individuals (men and women) from urban slums, rural villages, and farms, Los Rios Region, Chile.