Literature DB >> 26967780

Motor areas of the frontal cortex in patients with motor eloquent brain lesions.

Lucia Bulubas1,2, Jamil Sabih1,2, Afra Wohlschlaeger3, Nico Sollmann1,2, Theresa Hauck1,2, Sebastian Ille1,2, Florian Ringel1, Bernhard Meyer1, Sandro M Krieg1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Because of its huge clinical potential, the importance of premotor areas for motor function itself and plastic reshaping due to tumors or ischemic brain lesions has received increased attention. Thus, in this study the authors used navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) to investigate whether tumorous brain lesions induce a change in motor cortex localization in the human brain. METHODS Between 2010 and 2013, nTMS motor mapping was performed in a prospective cohort of 100 patients with brain tumors in or adjacent to the rolandic cortex. Spatial data analysis was performed by normalization of the individual motor maps and creation of overlays according to tumor location. Analysis of motor evoked potential (MEP) latencies was performed regarding mean overall latencies and potentially polysynaptic latencies, defined as latencies longer than 1 SD above the mean value. Hemispheric dominance, lesion location, and motor-function deficits were also considered. RESULTS Graphical analysis showed that motor areas were not restricted to the precentral gyrus. Instead, they spread widely in the anterior-posterior direction. An analysis of MEP latency showed that mean MEP latencies were shortest in the precentral gyrus and longest in the superior and middle frontal gyri. The percentage of latencies longer than 1 SD differed widely across gyri. The dominant hemisphere showed a greater number of longer latencies than the nondominant hemisphere (p < 0.0001). Moreover, tumor location-dependent changes in distribution of polysynaptic latencies were observed (p = 0.0002). Motor-function deficit did not show any statistically significant effect. CONCLUSIONS The distribution of primary and polysynaptic motor areas changes in patients with brain tumors and highly depends on tumor location. Thus, these data should be considered for resection planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADM = abductor digiti minimi; APB = abductor pollicis brevis; BCS = biceps; DCS = direct cortical stimulation; EMG = electromyography; FCR = flexor carpi radialis; GCN = gastrocnemius; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; MEP = motor evoked potential; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; PMd = dorsal premotor area; PMv = ventral premotor area; PoG = postcentral gyrus; PrG = precentral gyrus; SD = standard deviation; SFG = superior frontal gyrus; SMA = supplementary motor area; TA = tibialis anterior; brain tumor; frontal motor areas; motor evoked potentials; nTMS = navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation; oncology; premotor areas; rMT = resting motor threshold; surgical technique; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26967780     DOI: 10.3171/2015.11.JNS152103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  6 in total

1.  MEG imaging of recurrent gliomas reveals functional plasticity of hemispheric language specialization.

Authors:  Tavish Traut; Nina Sardesh; Lucia Bulubas; Anne Findlay; Susanne M Honma; Danielle Mizuiri; Mitchel S Berger; Leighton B Hinkley; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Phiroz E Tarapore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Assessing the Capabilities of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to Aid in the Removal of Brain Tumors Affecting the Motor Cortex: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lucas Jose Vaz Schiavao; Iuri Neville Ribeiro; Cintya Yukie Hayashi; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Gabriel Pokorny; Wellingson Silva Paiva
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.989

3.  Structure and function of corticospinal projection originating from supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Ya-Wen Xu; Peng Lin; Pei-Sen Yao; Shu-Fa Zheng; De-Zhi Kang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  The variability of motor evoked potential latencies in neurosurgical motor mapping by preoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Nico Sollmann; Lucia Bulubas; Noriko Tanigawa; Claus Zimmer; Bernhard Meyer; Sandro M Krieg
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Motor Cortical Network Plasticity in Patients With Recurrent Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Lucia Bulubas; Nina Sardesh; Tavish Traut; Anne Findlay; Danielle Mizuiri; Susanne M Honma; Sandro M Krieg; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Phiroz E Tarapore
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Integrating navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping in hypofractionated and single-dose gamma knife radiosurgery: A two-patient case series and a review of literature.

Authors:  Mominul Islam; Gerald Cooray; Hamza Benmakhlouf; Mustafa Hatiboglu; Georges Sinclair
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.