Ying Liu1, Elizabeth R Snedecor2, Yeon Ja Choi3, Ning Yang3, Xu Zhang1, Yuhuan Xu1, Yunlin Han1, Evan C Jones4, Kenneth R Shroyer3, Richard A Clark4, Lianfeng Zhang1, Chuan Qin5, Jiang Chen6. 1. Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Comparative Medical Center, Peking Union Medical College, and Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Graduate Program in Genetics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 4. Department of Dermatology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. 5. Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Comparative Medical Center, Peking Union Medical College, and Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China. Electronic address: qinchuan@pumc.edu.cn. 6. Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Comparative Medical Center, Peking Union Medical College, and Key Laboratory of Human Disease Comparative Medicine, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China; Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA; Department of Dermatology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA. Electronic address: jiang.chen@stonybrook.edu.
Abstract
GORAB is a golgin that localizes predominantly at the Golgi apparatus and physically interacts with small guanosine triphosphatases. GORAB is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues, including the skin. However, the biological function of this golgin in skin is unknown. Here, we report that disrupting the expression of the Gorab gene in mice results in hair follicle morphogenesis defects that were characterized by impaired follicular keratinocyte differentiation. This hair follicle phenotype was associated with markedly suppressed hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway in dermal condensates in vivo. Gorab-deficient dermal mesenchymal cells also displayed a significantly reduced capability to respond to Hh pathway activation in vitro. Furthermore, we found that the formation of the primary cilium, a cellular organelle that is essential for the Hh pathway, was impaired in mutant dermal condensate cells, suggesting that Gorab may be required for the Hh pathway through facilitating the formation of primary cilia. Thus, data obtained from this study provided insight into the biological functions of Gorab during embryonic morphogenesis of the skin in which Hh signaling and primary cilia exert important functions.
GORAB is a golgin that localizes predominantly at the Golgi apparatus and physically interacts with small guanosine triphosphatases. GORAB is ubiquitously expressed in mammalian tissues, including the skin. However, the biological function of this golgin in skin is unknown. Here, we report that disrupting the expression of the Gorab gene in mice results in hair follicle morphogenesis defects that were characterized by impaired follicular keratinocyte differentiation. This hair follicle phenotype was associated with markedly suppressed hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway in dermal condensates in vivo. Gorab-deficient dermal mesenchymal cells also displayed a significantly reduced capability to respond to Hh pathway activation in vitro. Furthermore, we found that the formation of the primary cilium, a cellular organelle that is essential for the Hh pathway, was impaired in mutant dermal condensate cells, suggesting that Gorab may be required for the Hh pathway through facilitating the formation of primary cilia. Thus, data obtained from this study provided insight into the biological functions of Gorab during embryonic morphogenesis of the skin in which Hh signaling and primary cilia exert important functions.
The Golgi apparatus is a cellular organelle essential for the
post-translational processing, sorting, and transport of proteins. These diverse
functions of the Golgi are mediated by a host of Golgi-associated proteins. GORAB,
also called SCY1-like 1-binding protein 1 (SCYL1BP1) or N-terminal kinase-like
protein binding protein 1 (NTKL-BP1) contains coiled-coil motif and localizes
predominantly at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) (Liu
). GORAB also interacts with a small
GTPase, namely RAB6 (Hennies ), a small GTPase that is extensively involved in the
secretory and endocytic pathways of intracellular trafficking (Stenmark, 2009). These properties qualify GORAB as a golgin.
They also suggest it functions in intracellular trafficking.The GORAB gene is highly conserved from fly to human.
Autosomal recessive mutations in the humanGORAB gene cause
geroderma osteodysplasticum or gerodermia osteodysplastica (GO, OMIM 231070) (Hennies ), a
congenital condition characterized by wrinkly skin and osteoporosis. Currently, the
molecular mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of GO is unclear. However, the
association of GORAB with the congenital phenotypes in GO strongly suggests that
GORAB may play important functions in embryonic morphogenesis.In mice, the morphogenesis of the skin initiates when cells of the surface
ectoderm commit to an epidermal fate (Koster and
Roop, 2007). It is then followed by a series of epidermal stratification
and differentiation programs regulated by transcriptional factors, notably TRP63
(p63) (Koster and Roop, 2007). Epidermal
differentiation results in the formation of the suprabasal and spinous layers of the
epidermis between E14.5 and E16.5, and ultimately the cornified cell envelope and
epidermal barrier. The formation of the hair follicle is initiated by hair follicle
induction, the formation of the hair placodes or stage 1 hair follicles, at
approximately at E14.5 (Schneider ). It is then followed by organogenesis and
cytodifferentiation, through which stage 2 hair germs mature into stage 5 hair pegs.
During this process the KRT14-positive outer root sheath starts to differentiate and
gives rise to the KRT75-positive companion layer (Schweizer ). Further differentiation of
embryonic hair follicles results in the formation of the inner root sheath, the hair
follicle cortex, and ultimately the hair shaft (Paus
).Throughout the morphogenesis of hair follicles, extensive
mesenchymal-epithelial interactions occur, where dermal condensate or dermal papilla
cells play instructive roles (Botchkarev and Paus,
2003). Canonical Wnt and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling are among the best
characterized molecular signaling pathways during hair follicle morphogenesis (Millar, 2002; Schmidt-Ullrich and Paus, 2005; Yang and
Cotsarelis, 2010). Wnt signaling is believed to be the “first
dermal signal” (Hardy, 1992) and
essential for hair follicle induction (Andl
; Gat
). Hh signaling is required for
cytodifferentiation of follicular keratinocytes (Chiang ; Mill ; St-Jacques ; Woo ). During skin morphogenesis,
sonic hedgehog (SHH), the predominant Hh ligand in the skin, is produced by
follicular keratinocytes. However, it is able to regulate Hh signaling in follicular
keratinocyte and dermal papilla cells (St-Jacques
).The primary cilium, or nonmotile cilium, is a singular hair-like structure
that protrudes from the surface of most mammalian cell types (Goetz and Anderson, 2010; Singla and Reiter, 2006), including epidermal keratinocytes and dermal
papilla cells. One of the best understood functions of primary cilia during tissue
morphogenesis is the processing of Hh signals. Abnormal cilia formation and function
results in impaired Hh signaling and contributes to the development of ciliopathies
(Badano ;
Hildebrandt ; Tobin and Beales, 2009).
Disrupting primary cilia formation during skin morphogenesis can result in severely
impaired Hh signaling and hair follicle formation (Chen ; Croyle ; Dai ; Dai
; Ezratty ; Lehman ), suggesting that primary cilia are
essential for proper Hh signaling during hair follicle morphogenesis.To gain insight into the molecular functions of GORAB during skin
morphogenesis, we engineered a mouse model in which the expression of the
Gorab gene was disrupted. Striking hair follicle morphogenesis
defects were observed in homozygous Gorab mutants. Further
examination associated these phenotypes with disrupted Hh signaling and impaired
primary cilia formation in dermal condensate cells. Data obtained from this study
underscores the role of golgins in orchestrating molecular signaling during
embryonic morphogenesis.
RESULTS
Gorab is expressed in embryonic skin
Gorab is highly expressed in the skin as determined by
quantitative RT-PCR (Hennies ). To further define its expression pattern in
embryonic mouse skin, we performed in situ hybridization and
observed that Gorab is ubiquitously expressed in basal
epidermal keratinocytes, follicular keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts, and
dermal papilla cells (Figure 1a).
Figure 1
Gorab is involved in skin morphogenesis
(a) Expression of Gorab in E15.5 mouse
skin by in situ hybridization.
Gorab+/+, wild-type;
Gorab−/−, homozygous mutant.
(b) Gene targeting strategy and predicted transcripts.
(c) Genotyping for control and Gorab mutants.
(d) Expression of GORAB by western blotting. (e)
Appearance of E18.5 control and homozygous mutant. (f) Histology of
dorsal skin of E15.5 and E18.5 controls and Gorab mutants.
(g) Quantification of hair follicle numbers
(n≥5). (h) Skin transplants at 3 weeks
(n≥3). (i) Histology of skin
transplants in (h). Asterisks marked hair follicle-like remnants.
(j) TUNEL staining of skin transplants in (h). Arrowheads point
to TUNEL-positive cells. Dotted lines illustrate epidermal-dermal junction.
Scale bars: 20 µm (a); 50 µm (j); 100
µm (f); 200 µm (i); 2 mm
(h).
Generation of Gorab-deficient mouse model
To gain insight into the biological function of GORAB, we generated a
mutant mouse model from ES cell clone XG183 (BayGenomics consortium, CA, USA),
in which a gene-trap vector (SA β-geo) was inserted into intron 1 of the
Gorab locus (Figure.
1b). This trap vector is expected to interfere with splicing,
resulting in a fusion transcript comprised of exon 1 of Gorab
and β-geo (Figure 1b). Genotyping
with Intron-F and Intron-R primers and direct genomic DNA sequencing confirmed
that the β-geo cassette was inserted into intron 1 (Figure 1c and Supplemental Figure S1). In situ
hybridization and western blotting with a polyclonal GORAB antibody against
1–264 amino acid of humanGORAB demonstrated that Gorab
transcripts and protein were absent from homozygous mutants (Figure 1a and d). Thus, this mutant model is
regarded as a null allele of Gorab, hereafter referred to as
Gorab−/−.Homozygous mutants
(Gorab−/−) were obtained by crossing
heterozygous mutants (Gorab+/−). Wild-type
(Gorab+/+), heterozygous
(Gorab+/−), and homozygous
(Gorab−/−) were obtained at
normal Mendelian ratios at birth. The size of
Gorab−/− pups appeared
comparable with that of Gorab+/+ or
Gorab+/− littermates (Figure 1e). However,
Gorab−/− mutants displayed
hunched backs and craniofacial deformities (Figure
1e). In addition,
Gorab−/− mutants started to gasp
for air within minutes of birth and dying. These phenotypes suggested that
Gorab−/− mutants may 7 have
morphogenesis defects in the musculoskeletal and respiratory systems, which will
be addressed elsewhere.
Gorab is indispensable for hair follicle
morphogenesis
This investigation is focused on the skin. Skins of newborn
Gorab−/− pups appeared edematous
but otherwise unremarkable (Figure 1e).
Histological examination of the embryonic skin of
Gorab−/− mutants revealed normal
architecture of the epidermis (Figure 1f).
In addition, immunofluorescence examination of early and late epidermal
differentiation markers, keratin 1 (KRT1) and loricrin (LOR), in E18.5 skins
demonstrated comparable epidermal differentiation profiles in control and
Gorab−/− mutants (Supplemental Figure. S2).
These observations suggested that Gorab may not play a
significant role during the formation of the epidermis.Skins of E15.5 control and
Gorab−/− mutants contained
comparable numbers of hair germs. In contrast, E18.5 mutant skins contained
significantly reduced numbers of hair follicles (Figure 1f and g). In addition, hair follicles in the mutant skin
appeared less developed, suggesting that the progression of hair follicle
morphogenesis is impaired. To follow postnatal hair follicle development, skin
biopsies from E18.5 embryos were transplanted onto nude mice. Three weeks later,
control transplants developed abundant hair, whereas
Gorab−/− transplants developed
barely any hair (Figure 1h). Histology of
transplants showed that hair defects in
Gorab−/− transplants were
associated with the lack of morphologically normal hair follicles (Figure 1i). However, hair follicle-like
remnants in the mutant transplants indicated that hair follicles had
nevertheless undergone significant development before degeneration (Figure 1i, asterisk). TUNEL staining revealed
that apoptotic cells were restricted to the orifices of hair follicles in
control skin transplant, whereas the number of apoptotic cells not only
increased in Gorab−/− transplants
but also dispersed into the dermal mesenchyme (Figure 1j), indicating a mechanism through which hair follicle
remnants were cleared from postnatal skin. Thus, data demonstrated that
Gorab is indispensable for the morphogenesis of all types
of hair follicles of dorsal skin.To further evaluate hair follicle induction, the formation of hair germs
in E15.5 skins was examined by immunofluorescence labeling of KRT17. Hair germs
of control and Gorab−/− mutants
appeared comparable (Figure 2a). In
addition, the expression of LEF1 suggested that the canonical Wnt signaling
pathway, which is essential for hair follicle induction (Andl ), was also unaffected in
Gorab−/− hair follicles (Figure 2b). Furthermore, follicular
keratinocyte proliferation in stage 2 hair follicles of
Gorab−/− mutants, as determined
by Ki67 staining, was also comparable to controls (Supplemental Figure S3).
Evaluation of alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity in E18.5 skins showed that
mutant dermal papilla cells are AP positive despite the mutant skin contained
fewer dermal condensates or dermal papillae (Figure 2c). Thus, data obtained so far suggest that
Gorab is not essential for hair follicle induction; rather,
it is indispensable for later stages of hair follicle morphogenesis.
Figure 2
Hair follicle induction in Gorab mutants
(a) Detection of hair germs in E15.5 dorsal skin of control
(Gorab+/+) and homozygous Gorab
mutants (Gorab−/−) by keratin 17
(KRT17, red). Keratin 14 (KRT14) was labeled green. Dotted lines outline the
basement membrane. (b) Examination of LEF1 (red) in E15.5 skin.
KRT14 was labeled green; nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). (c)
Flat-mount (upper panels) and sagittal sections (lower panels) of alkaline
phosphatase (AP) stained E18.5 dorsal skins. (d) H&E
staining of stage 2 hair follicles in E15.5 embryos and quantification. Note
that the number of dermal papilla cells was reduced in homozygous mutants.
Arrows point to dermal condensate cells. Scale bars: 50 µm
(a, b, and d); 200 µm
(c).
Throughout this study, we noticed that hair follicles in E15.5 and E18.5
Gorab−/− mutants harbored
consistently fewer dermal condensate cells (Figure. 2b–d). Quantification (based on H&E
staining) of cells in mesenchymal condensates of stage 2 and stage 3 hair
follicles confirmed that mutant hair follicles contained significantly reduced
number of dermal condensate cells in the mutant in comparison to those in
controls (Figure. 2d). More interestingly,
we found that dermal condensate cells of
Gorab−/− mutants were not
readily detectable by dermal condensate cell markers, such as nerve growth
factor receptor (NGFR, also known as p75 neurotrophin receptor) (Figure 3a and Supplemental Figure S4),
suggesting that the dermal condensates in mutant skin were quantitatively and
qualitatively different than those in controls.
Figure 3
Abnormality in dermal mesenchymal cells during hair follicle
formation
(a) Examination of dermal condensate cells in E15.5 embryos
by NGFR (red). KRT14 was labeled green; nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).
Lower panels are enlargements of boxed areas in upper panels. Arrows point to
dermal condensate cells. (b) Skin and hair follicle reconstitution
assay. Genotypes of keratinocytes (KC) and dermal fibroblasts (DF) were
indicated for each graft. +/+, wild-type; −/−, homozygous.
n ≥ 3. Epi, epidermis; Der, dermis. Scale bars: 50
µm.
To functionally determine which cell type, i.e, keratinocyte or dermal
condensate cells, is responsible for the hair follicle morphogenesis defects in
Gorab−/− mutants, mismatched
hair follicle re-constitution assays were performed. Specifically,
Gorab−/− keratinocytes or dermal
fibroblasts were mixed with wild-type dermal fibroblasts or keratinocytes,
respectively, and grafted on nude mice (Foxn1) to
regenerate the skin and hair follicles. Skin grafts regenerated with wild-type
dermal fibroblasts, irrespective of the genotype of keratinocytes, formed
abundant hair (Figure 3b). In contrast,
skin grafts regenerated with
Gorab−/− dermal fibroblasts
displayed severely compromised hair regeneration (Figure 3b). This experiment demonstrated that it is mutant dermal
condensate cells, but not keratinocytes, that were associated with the hair
follicle morphogenesis defects in
Gorab−/− mutants.
Gorab is required for proper Hh signaling in dermal papilla
cells
By E18.5 fewer hair follicles in the dorsal skin of
Gorab−/− mutants developed
beyond stage 4 (Figure. 1f) and expressed
hair follicle differentiation markers, such as KRT75 (a companion layer marker)
and AE13 (an acidic hair cortex keratins marker (Lynch )) (Supplemental Figure S5).
These observations suggested that the cytodifferentiation of mutant hair
follicles was disrupted in Gorab−/−
mutants. Because the Hh pathway is one of the most important molecular signaling
required for hair follicles differentiation (Botchkarev and Paus, 2003), and the hair follicle phenotypes of the
Gorab−/− mutants resemble those
observed in Hh mutant mice (Chiang ; Gat
; Mill ; St-Jacques ; Woo ), we investigated Hh
signaling in Gorab−/− mutants.
In situ hybridization revealed that dermal condensates of
mutant skin express remarkably reduced levels of Hh responsive genes, such as
Gli1 and Ptch1 (Figure 4a and b). In contrast, the expression of these genes
did not seem to be affected in mutant follicular keratinocytes (Figure 4a and b). Furthermore, the expression
of Shh, which encodes the ligand of the Hh pathway, was
unaffected in follicular keratinocytes (Figure
4c). These results associated defective Hh signaling pathway with
hair follicles defects in Gorab−/−
mutant mice. They also suggested that Gorab may be specifically
required for the activation of Hh signaling in dermal condensate cells.
Figure 4
Hh signaling pathways is impaired in mutant mesenchymal cells
(a–c) Expression of Gli1, Ptch1,
and Shh in E15.5 skins of control
(Gorab+/+) and homozygous Gorab
mutants (Gorab−/−) by in
situ hybridization. Dotted lines illustrate the basement membrane.
Arrowheads point to dermal papilla cells. n=4. (d)
Expression of GORAB, full-length GLI3 (GLI3-FL, ≈190 kDa), and repressor
form of GLI3 (GLI3-R, ≈85 kDa) in Gorab knockdown (KD)
mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) by western blotting. (e and
f) Quantification of Gli1 and
Ptch1 mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR after SAG treatment in
control (Ctrl) and KD MEFs. Asterisk (*) indicates p <
0.01. (g) Quantification GLI3-FL/GLI3-R ratio in control and KD
MEFs as shown in a. (h) Quantification of
Smo mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR in SAG-treated control and
KD MEFs. All experiments were performed three times. Scale bars: 20
µm.
To further dissect the Hh signaling pathway, Gorab was
knocked down in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), a cell type frequently used
for the examination of Hh responsiveness (Figure
4d–h). The Hh pathway was subsequently activated with SAG, a
Smo agonist (Chen ). Gorab-knockdown was confirmed by western
blotting (Figure 4d). Quantitative RT-PCR
of Hh responsive gene Gli1 and Ptch1
demonstrated a significantly reduced response to Hh pathway activation in
knockdown cells (Figure 4e and f).
Furthermore, GLI3 processing, as determined by the full-length GLI3 (GLI3-FL)
and GLI3 repressor (GLI3-R) ratio in western blotting, was also disrupted in
knockdown cells (Figure 4d and g). In
contrast, the expression levels of the Smo receptor in control
and Gorab-knockdown cells were comparable (Figure 4h). Taken together, these in vivo
and in vitro data suggested that the hair follicle phenotype in
Gorab−/− mutant are likely
associated with disrupted Hh pathway activation in dermal mesenchymal cells.
GORAB is enriched at the Golgi apparatus but not essential for Golgi
structure in fibroblasts
GORAB is enriched at the Golgi. To determine whether
Gorab expression is required for Golgi architecture or
function, we examined the expression of Golgi resident proteins in
Gorab-knockdown MEFs. Immunofluorescence labeling
demonstrated that GORAB is almost completely absent in knockdown cells (Supplemental Figure S6).
Examination of trans-Golgi marker Golgin-97 (GOLGA1) and
cis-medial Golgi marker lectin Helix
pomatia agglutinin (HPA) showed that the expression pattern these
Golgi-associated proteins and the morphology of the Golgi apparatus appeared
comparable in control and Gorab-knockdown cells (Supplemental Figure S6).
These findings were consistent with previous observations (Hennies ), and suggested GORAB
is not essential for maintaining Golgi structure or the localization of Golgi
resident proteins in dermal fibroblasts. Rather, it may function in post-Golgi
trafficking of proteins.
Gorab is involved in primary cilia formation in dermal
condensate cells
The primary cilium is essential for the Hh signaling pathway and is
indispensable for dermal papilla cells during hair follicle morphogenesis (Dai ; Lehman ; Woo ). In
fact, hair follicle phenotypes observed in
Gorab−/− mutants herein
phenocopied those in a number of cilia mutants (Chen ; Croyle ; Dai ; Dai ; Ezratty ; Lehman ). To
determine whether Hh signaling defects in
Gorab−/− mutants was associated
with primary cilia abnormalities, we examined primary cilia formation in
Gorab−/− mutants and found that
the formation of primary cilia was severely impaired in dermal condensate cells
in E15.5 and E18.5 Gorab−/− skins
(Figure 5a and b; Supplemental Figure S7),
such that 57.88 ± 24.72% dermal condensate cells of stage 2 and
stage 3 hair follicles were ciliated in control skin, and only 18.02 ±
14.87% were ciliated in
Gorab−/− mutants (Figure 5c). Interestingly, primary cilia in
keratinocytes of either the epidermis or the hair follicles appeared comparable
between controls and Gorab−/−
mutants (Figure 5; Supplemental Figure S7).
These observations suggested that disrupted primary cilia formation is likely
responsible for the disrupted Hh signaling pathway in mutant dermal papilla
cells, thereby contributing to the hair follicle morphogenesis defects in
Gorab−/− mutant mice.
Figure 5
Formation of primary cilia is impaired in dermal condensate cells of
Gorab mutants
(a) Immunofluorescence labeling of primary cilia with
ARL13B (green) in dorsal skin of E18.5 control
(Gorab+/+) and homozygous Gorab
mutants (Gorab−/−). Basal bodies
labeled with γ-tubulin (red); nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).
Lower panels are magnified boxed hair germs in the upper panels. Dotted lines
illustrate the basement membrane. Arrowheads point to dermal papilla cells.
(c and d) Quantification of ciliated dermal
condensate cells (c) and follicular keratinocytes (d).
A minimum of three animals were evaluated for each genotype. Asterisk (*)
indicates p<0.05. Scale bars: 50 µm.
DISCUSSION
The Golgi apparatus is a vital organelle of the cell. The biological
functions of Golgi during skin morphogenesis are not well understood. In this study
we demonstrated that GORAB, a Golgi-associated protein, is required for proper Hh
signaling during embryonic morphogenesis of hair follicles, and suggested that GORAB
may participate in Hh signaling through facilitating primary cilia formation. Thus,
findings obtained from this study provided an example of how Golgi-associated
proteins regulate skin morphogenesis.The Hh pathway is a key molecular signaling mechanism of skin morphogenesis
(Driskell ;
Lee and Tumbar, 2012; Millar, 2002; Oro and Higgins, 2003; Schmidt-Ullrich
and Paus, 2005; Yang and Cotsarelis,
2010). In vertebrates, the activation of the Hh signaling pathway is
typically mediated in a paracrine fashion, in which the epithelial cells produce the
ligand to signal the adjacent mesenchymal cells (Ingham and McMahon, 2001). In this study, we found that the expression
of Shh, the Hh ligand, was unaffected in follicular keratinocytes
in Gorab mutants. The expression of Hh responsive genes was also
undisrupted in follicular keratinocytes. In contrast, the Hh pathway was
significantly impaired in Gorab-deficient dermal mesenchymal cells
in vitro and in vivo. These observations
suggest that Gorab is specifically required for the activation of
Hh signaling pathway in recipient cells in the mesenchyme, at least in the context
of hair follicle morphogenesis. Thus, data obtained from this study provided an
example of how molecular signaling is spatially regulated during morphogenesis. How
Gorab achieves tissue- or cell type-specific regulation of Hh
signaling remains to be determined.Disrupting Gorab affected the number of dermal papilla
cells and their capability of expressing NGFR, responding to Hh pathway activation,
and forming primary cilia. However, these abnormalities were relatively subtle. It
remains to be further determined whether other mechanisms, such as disrupted dermal
papilla cell proliferation and differentiation through impaired p75 NGFR signaling
(Botchkareva ) or a more general effect associated with this golgin, have collectively
contributed to hair follicle morphogenesis defects.Gorab is also expressed in epidermal keratinocytes. Our
investigation did not reveal overt epidermal abnormalities, suggesting that
Gorab may not play a significant role during epidermal
morphogenesis. Interestingly, GORAB has been linked to the regulation of TRP53 (p53)
expression during neurite outgrowth (Liu ) and tumor cell growth in vitro
(Hu ; Yang ), in which
GORAB acts in MDM2-mediated polyubiquitination and proteasome degradation of p53
(Yan ; Zhang ). While
regulating p53 stability by GORAB unlikely plays a significant role during epidermal
morphogenesis, it remains to be determined whether GORAB is involved in post-natal
skin homeostasis by regulating the level of p53 at the post-translational level.Recent progress in understanding the biological functions of primary cilium
substantially expanded our understanding on how Hh signal pathway is regulated
during morphogenesis (Berbari ; Goetz and Anderson,
2010; Oro, 2007; Veland ; Wong and Reiter, 2008). Data obtained from this
study suggests that participating in primary cilia formation is a candidate
mechanism through which Gorab is involved in Hh signaling. The
precise molecular mechanism through which GORAB participates in primary cilia
formation remains to be determined in future studies. However, based on the
knowledge that GORAB is enriched at the Golgi and interacts with RAB6, a small
GTPase that is extensively involved in intracellular trafficking (Stenmark, 2009), it is conceivable that GORAB
participates in ciliogenesis through regulating the Golgi localization or
intracellular trafficking of ciliogenic proteins.Mutations in the humanGORAB gene are associated with GO.
Disease-causing mutations in the GORAB gene are predominantly
missense mutations located across the coding sequence (Al-Dosari and Alkuraya, 2009; Hennies ), often resulting in complete
absence of the GORAB protein (Hennies ). The mutant Gorabmouse model
engineered in this study does not express detectable levels of
Gorab mRNA or protein. Therefore, it is likely to be able to
mimic GO at the genetic level. Although the characteristic pre-mature aging
phenotypes of GO, specifically wrinkly skin and osteoporosis, remains to be
characterized in this mouse model, data obtained from this study suggest that
impaired Hh signaling may contribute to the development of GO-related skin and bone
phenotypes. In comparison to strong hair follicle phenotypes and pathway suppression
in Hh mutants (Chiang ; Mill ; St-Jacques ; Woo ), Gorab mutants displayed relatively mild Hh
phenotypes. Thus, it is probable that Gorab may perform functions
beyond controlling Hh signaling or primary cilia formation. In light of recent
reports which demonstrated that the GORAB protein physically interacts with RAB6 and
ARF5, small GTPases involved in anterograde and retrograde intracellular trafficking
(Egerer ;
Hennies ),
it is conceivable that GORAB performs important functions along the secretory and
endocytic pathways.In summary, this study linked the function of GORAB, a golgin, to Hh
signaling and primary cilia formation during hair follicle morphogenesis. It not
only provided important insight into the biological function of GORAB during
embryonic morphogenesis but also provided an example of how skin morphogenesis is
regulated at the Golgi level. Further understanding of the molecular functions of
GORAB in the context of Hh signaling and primary cilia formation may provide
important insight into how golgins coordinate intracellular trafficking of
proteins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Generation of Gorab mutant mouse model
ES cell clone XG183, containing the trap vector pGT1Lxf, was obtained
from BayGenomics consortium (CA, USA). ES cells were cultured as recommended by
the supplier and injected into blastocysts (C57BL6) before implantation in
surrogate moms to generate chimeric mice. Chimeric mice were backcrossed to the
C57BL6 mice. F1 mice were identified by PCR-based genotyping of the
Gorab locus with primers Intron1-F and Intron1-R (Figure. 1 and Supplemental Figure
S1).Mice used in this study were maintained on a mixed genetic background of
129 and C57BL6. Homozygous Gorab mutants
(Gorab−/−) were obtained by
crossing heterozygous (Gorab+/−) mice.
Wild-type (Gorab+/+) littermates were used as
controls. E15.5 and E18.5 fetuses were obtained by timed-mating. All procedures
related to mice were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
of ILAS and Stony Brook University.
Tissue processing and histology analyses
Freshly isolated tissues were fixed immediately in formalin and embedded
in paraffin and sectioned and processed for routine hematoxylin and eosin
(H&E) staining or other examinations. Specimens were examined on an
Olympus BX40 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or Nikon 80i (Melville, NY) microscope.
Alkaline phosphatase staining
Alkaline phosphatase (AP) staining was performed on fresh skin with the
NBT/BCIP method as previously described (Tsai
). After staining, skins were either
immediately imaged on a LEICA M125 dissecting microscope fitted with a LEICA
DFC450 camera or embedded in OCT, sectioned at 10 µm, and counter
stained with 0.1% nuclear fast red before being mounted on glycerol and
photographed.
In situ hybridization
In situ hybridization was carried out on formalin-fixed
paraffin embedded tissue sections using the RNAScope system (Advanced Cell
Diagnostic, Hayward, CA) per manufacturer’s instructions and as
previously described (Chen ; Wang
).
Cell culture and in vitro assays
The isolation of primary keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts from E18.5
embryos was conducted as described elsewhere (Dai ). Primary mouse embryonic
fibroblasts (MEF) were generated by disrupting E12.5 embryos in trypsin.
Fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium
(4.5 g/l glucose) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and
antibiotics. Knockdown was performed by 15 nM siRNA (IDT) and RNAi/MAX
transfection per manufacturer’s recommendation. To examine Hh signaling,
MEFs were serum-starved for 24 hours, treated with 100 nM SAG (Calbiochem) for
another 24 hours, before being lysed in RLT buffer (Qiagen) for RNA extraction
or RIPA buffer for western blotting.
RNA isolation and quantitative RT-PCR
RNA was isolated with the RNeasy kit (Qiagen) and quantitative RT-PCR
analyses were performed as described previously (Dai et al., 2013). Complementary DNA was synthesized from 2
µg of total mRNA using a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit
(Applied Biosystems) and random hexameric primers. Real-time qRT-PCR was
performed on ABI Prism 7500 with the following TaqMan probes: Gli1,
Mm00494645_m1; Gli2, Mm01293111_m1; Ptch1, Mm00436026_m1; Smo, Mm01162710_m1;
and β-actin, Mm00607939_m1 (Life Technologies). Results were analyzed
using the ΔΔCt method. Relative expression levels of target
genes were determined by comparing with wild type or treatment controls after
normalizing with β-actin.
Protein Analysis
Protein was extracted in cold RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4,
150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and
0.1% SDS) supplemented with proteinase inhibitors. Tissue or cell
lysates were cleared and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to
polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, Millipore) or Hybond nitrocellulose (GE
Healthcare) membranes, following standard procedures. Blots were probed with the
primary antibodies which were then detected with HRP-conjugated secondary
antibodies (BD biosciences) and SuperSignal substrates (Thermo Scientific).
Enhanced chemiluminescent (ECL) substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL USA) and
CL-XPosure film (Thermo Scientific) were used for detection. The following
primary antibodies were used: GORAB, 1:1,000 (Proteintech); β-actin,
1:1,000 (Santa Cruz); GLI1, 1:250 (clone V812, Cell Signaling); GLI3 (1
µg/ml, Cell Signaling). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)
or β-actin was used as a loading control. Quantification was performed
with densitometry and ImageJ software (1.43u, NIH).
Immunofluorescence labeling and microscopy
Immunofluorescence labeling of tissue specimens was performed as
described previously (Dai et al., 2013).
Cells were fixed in 4% PFA and blocked in 1% BSA prior to
incubating with primary antibodies. The following primary antibodies were used:
GORAB, 1:500 (Proteintech); KRT14, 1:1,000 (Covance); KRT1, 1:2000 (Roop et al.,
1987); KRT17, 1:200 (Abcam); LOR, 1:500 (Covance); NGFR, 1:200 (Promega); LEF1,
1:100 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA); acetylated α-tubulin, 1:600
(Sigma); γ-tubulin, 1:500 (Abcam); ARL13B, 1:100
(#73–287, NeuroMab); lectin Helix pomatia
agglutinin (HPA), 1:1,000 (Invitrogen); Golgin97, 1:1,000 (Molecular Probes),
and Ki67, 1:1000 (BD Pharmingen). AlexaFluor-conjugated secondary antibodies
(1:250) were from Life Technologies. Sections were sealed in mounting medium
with DAPI (Vector Laboratories). TUNEL staining were performed with DeadEnd
Fluorometric TUNEL System (Promega). Images were acquired by Nikon
80i fitted with Nikon DS-Qi1Mc camera and processed with
Photoshop 5.5 CS.
Skin transplantation and hair follicle reconstitution assay
Dorsal skin obtained from E18.5 embryos were transplanted onto the back
of 8 – 12 week old nude mice
(Foxn1−/−) as described
previously (Dai ). Keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts isolated from control and
homozygous mutants were used immediately in skin and hair follicle
reconstitution assays as described in (Dai
). Briefly, 2 ×
106 keratinocytes were mixed with 2 × 106
fibroblasts of the same or mis-matched genotypes before the cell slurry was
seeded in silicon grafting chambers placed on the back of nude mice. For skin
transplantation and reconstitution assays, grafting chambers were removed 10
days after placement and skin grafts were harvested two weeks thereafter.
Experiments were performed at least three times.
Statistical analyses
All quantifications are presented as mean ± S.D. Student t-test
was used unless otherwise stated. One-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were conducted
using the GraphPad software. P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Authors: Pleasantine Mill; Rong Mo; Hong Fu; Marina Grachtchouk; Peter C W Kim; Andrzej A Dlugosz; Chi-chung Hui Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: James K Chen; Jussi Taipale; Keith E Young; Tapan Maiti; Philip A Beachy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-10-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wing Lee Chan; Magdalena Steiner; Tomasz Witkos; Johannes Egerer; Björn Busse; Shuji Mizumoto; Jan M Pestka; Haikuo Zhang; Ingrid Hausser; Layal Abo Khayal; Claus-Eric Ott; Mateusz Kolanczyk; Bettina Willie; Thorsten Schinke; Chiara Paganini; Antonio Rossi; Kazuyuki Sugahara; Michael Amling; Petra Knaus; Danny Chan; Martin Lowe; Stefan Mundlos; Uwe Kornak Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Tomasz M Witkos; Wing Lee Chan; Merja Joensuu; Manuel Rhiel; Ed Pallister; Jane Thomas-Oates; A Paul Mould; Alex A Mironov; Christophe Biot; Yann Guerardel; Willy Morelle; Daniel Ungar; Felix T Wieland; Eija Jokitalo; May Tassabehji; Uwe Kornak; Martin Lowe Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Levente Kovacs; Jennifer Chao-Chu; Sandra Schneider; Marco Gottardo; George Tzolovsky; Nikola S Dzhindzhev; Maria Giovanna Riparbelli; Giuliano Callaini; David M Glover Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 38.330