Moe Htet1, Marwa Madi2, Osama Zakaria3, Takayuki Miyahara1, Wang Xin1, Zayar Lin1, Kazuhiro Aoki4, Shohei Kasugai1. 1. Oral Implantology and Regenerative Dental Medicine, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Medical Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis, and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pharos University, Alexandria, Egypt. 4. Department of Hard Tissue Engineering/Pharmacology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although oral rehabilitation with dental implants is a very promising and effective procedure, peri-implantitis is an emerging concern. Surgical and non-surgical methods have been applied to treat peri-implantitis together with various implant surface decontamination methods. However, there is no consensus concerning the most effective treatment for peri-implantitis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and titanium bur with and without citric acid on ligature-induced peri-implantitis around an anodized implant surface. METHODS: Thirty dental implants with anodized surface (3.3 × 10 mm) were installed in the mandibles of five beagle dogs. After 3 months, peri-implantitis was induced by applying cotton ligatures subgingivally. After ligature removal (baseline), the implants were divided into the following treatment groups: 1) Er:YAG laser, 2) PDT, 3) titanium bur alone, and 4) titanium bur with citric acid. Animals were sacrificed after 3 months, and clinical, radiologic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were conducted for all treatment modalities. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. A value of P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The titanium bur with citric acid group exhibited statistically significantly greater improvement in vertical bone height than the Er:YAG laser group and significantly better bone-to-implant contact than the PDT group and the bur-alone group. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the study, the combination of mechanical and chemical treatment proved to be the most effective treatment for disinfection of the anodized implant surface.
BACKGROUND: Although oral rehabilitation with dental implants is a very promising and effective procedure, peri-implantitis is an emerging concern. Surgical and non-surgical methods have been applied to treat peri-implantitis together with various implant surface decontamination methods. However, there is no consensus concerning the most effective treatment for peri-implantitis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of erbium-doped:yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (Er:YAG) laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and titanium bur with and without citric acid on ligature-induced peri-implantitis around an anodized implant surface. METHODS: Thirty dental implants with anodized surface (3.3 × 10 mm) were installed in the mandibles of five beagle dogs. After 3 months, peri-implantitis was induced by applying cotton ligatures subgingivally. After ligature removal (baseline), the implants were divided into the following treatment groups: 1) Er:YAG laser, 2) PDT, 3) titanium bur alone, and 4) titanium bur with citric acid. Animals were sacrificed after 3 months, and clinical, radiologic, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations were conducted for all treatment modalities. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey test. A value of P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The titanium bur with citric acid group exhibited statistically significantly greater improvement in vertical bone height than the Er:YAG laser group and significantly better bone-to-implant contact than the PDT group and the bur-alone group. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the study, the combination of mechanical and chemical treatment proved to be the most effective treatment for disinfection of the anodized implant surface.
Authors: Diederik F M Hentenaar; Yvonne C M De Waal; Hans Strooker; Henny J A Meijer; Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff; Gerry M Raghoebar Journal: Int J Implant Dent Date: 2017-07-17
Authors: Juliano Milanezi de Almeida; Henrique Rinaldi Matheus; Breno Edson Sendão Alves; David Jonathan Rodrigues Gusman; Maria José Hitomi Nagata; Elisa Mara de Abreu Furquim; Edilson Ervolino Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Pablo Verdeguer; Javier Gil; Miquel Punset; José María Manero; José Nart; Javi Vilarrasa; Elisa Ruperez Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 3.623