Literature DB >> 26966593

Adult-type granulosa cell tumour of the testis: Report of a case and review of the literature.

Osama Al-Alao1, Tawiz Gul1, Ammar Al-Ani1, Issam A Bozom2, Khalid Al-Jalham1.   

Abstract

Granulosa cell tumours (GCTs) can be either juvenile or adult type, and more commonly occur in the ovaries. Adult-type GCTs of the testis (AGCTT) are very rare and only 46 cases have previously been reported. We report here on a 48-year-old Filipino man with a left testicular AGCTT, which measured 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.0 cm. He underwent radical orchidectomy with postoperative surveillance for 1 year, which included computed tomography with oral intravenous contrast and clinical examinations, which have been unremarkable. The previously reported AGCTTs were briefly reviewed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AGCTT, adult-type GCT of the testis; Adult-type granulosa cell tumour; CD, cluster of differentiation; Cord-stromal; GCT, granulosa cell tumour; Granulosa; T2WI, T2 weighted imaging; Testis; Tumour

Year:  2016        PMID: 26966593      PMCID: PMC4767788          DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arab J Urol        ISSN: 2090-598X


Background

Sex cord-stromal tumours of the gonads are numerous including thecomas, fibromas, Sertoli, Leydig, Sertoli-Leydig cell, and granulosa cell tumours (GCTs) [1]. GCTs are divided into two different types: juvenile and adult [2]. The juvenile type commonly occurs in the first 6 months of life [3]. The adult type is very rare and can occur at any time after puberty. Only 46 cases of adult-type GCT of the testis (AGCTT) have been reported to date [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. Many morphological, clinical, and immunohistochemical characteristics have been identified that help in the diagnosis of AGCTT. AGCTT presents clinically as a slow, painless enlargement over a variable period of time in >50% of cases [4], [5], [6]. The mean (range) age at diagnosis is 47 (12–77) years [4], [7]. Erectile dysfunction, gynaecomastia, and decreased libido may also be present [5], [7]. AGCTTs typically have a solid, well-circumscribed, lobular mass that may have a fibrous pseudocapsule in gross morphological analysis. Some AGCTTs have the potential for distant metastases and thus poor outcomes, but otherwise they are non-functioning, slow growing, and most often benign [4], [8]. A relatively long survival period was found in patients with metastases to regional lymph nodes; however, deaths occurring at few months to a few years after metastases have occurred in patients that have distant metastasis and who exhibited rapid disease progression [8]. The retroperitoneal lymph nodes are the most common metastatic region, but lung, liver, and bone metastases have also been reported [8], [9], [10]. Recent evidence indicates that ≈20% of cases of AGCTT are malignant; however, factors predictive of malignancy have yet to be well defined due to the very limited number of cases.

Case report

A 48-year-old man presented with the complaint of mild pain in his left testis. He denied dysuria, urethral discharge, back pain, abdominal pain, or recent illness. There was no personal or family history of genitourinary disease and his past medical history was not significant. There had been no previous abdominal or genitourinary surgeries and he was a non-smoker. His vital signs were within normal limits and a physical examination was remarkable for tenderness and swelling in the left testis, with a small hard mass at the lower pole on palpation of the left testicle, and the right testicle was unremarkable. Other pertinent findings included the absence of cervical, supraclavicular, or inguinal lymphadenopathy, gynaecomastia, urethral discharge, or scrotal swelling. Abdominal examination revealed no masses or tenderness. Urine analysis showed no red blood corpuscles, leucocytes, or protein, and was negative for nitrite and leucocyte esterase. Serum tumour markers included lactate dehydrogenase measuring 197 IU/L, serum α1-fetoprotein measuring 2 ng/mL, and plasma β human chorionic gonadotrophin measuring <0.50 IU/mL. Testicular ultrasonography (US) revealed a left testis measuring 3.9 × 1.4 cm with a cystic lesion of 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.0 cm towards its lower pole, with coarse internal echoes, and the wall showed mild irregularity (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Left testicular US image with colour flow.

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the pelvis revealed a well-defined left intra-testicular focal lesion (1.2 × 1.2 × 1.0 cm) at the inferio-posterior aspect of the testis, which had a low signal on T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), and low to iso-intense on T1WI. There was a central high signal on T2WI, suggestive of fluid (necrosis). The tunica albuginea was infiltrated in a small area in the posterior aspect of the lesion to the near-by epididymis (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

MRI showing: A, T1 pre-contrast showing left testicular lesion; B, T1 post-contrast showing left testicular lesion; C, T1 coronal section post-contrast showing left testicular lesion; D, axial section T2 fat suppression; E, T2 coronal section; F, coronal section by multi-planar reconstruction showing no lymph nodes enlarged in the retroperitoneal space.

The patient agreed to an orchidectomy after his initial diagnosis and a radical orchidectomy was performed with no complications. Gross appearance of the specimen revealed a testis with a lower pole well-circumscribed solid mass measuring 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.0 cm. The mass had a fleshy and homogenous cut surface (Fig. 3). Microscopic evaluation revealed an encapsulated well-circumscribed nodule consisting of micro follicles, cords and solid sheets of tumour cells. The cells appeared elongated with scanty cytoplasm and pale ovoid nuclei. The nuclei had longitudinal grooves giving them a coffee bean-like appearance (Fig. 4). Very few mitotic figures could be seen. There was no evidence of haemorrhage, necrosis, sarcomatous differentiation or other germ cell elements.
Figure 3

A testicular lower pole well-circumscribed solid mass measuring 1.2 × 1.2 × 1.0 cm. It is fleshy and has a homogenous cut surface.

Figure 4

A microscopic section shows elongated tumour cells with scanty cytoplasm and pale ovoid nuclei. The nuclei show longitudinal grooves giving them a coffee bean-like appearance.

Immunohistochemistry was applied, the tumour cells were strongly positive for vimentin, inhibin (Fig. 5), calretenin, and cluster of differentiation 99 (CD99). Focal staining for smooth muscle actin, desmin, and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) was seen. The tumour cells were negative for placental alkaline phosphatase, stem cell marker Oct-3/4, Sal-like protein 4, synaptophysin, chromogranin, and CD117.
Figure 5

The tumour cells are strongly positive for inhibin.

Given the histopathological findings, as well as the immunohistochemistry, the patient was diagnosed with AGCTT. The 1-year postoperative surveillance, including CT with oral i.v. contrast and clinical examinations, has been unremarkable.

Discussion

The adult-type GCT is extremely rare in the testis, Schubert et al. [35] have found 43 cases in the literature [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36] and we were able to find three more recent cases in PubMed (Table 1) [2], [36]. However, in most of the reports these tumours are only the object of immunohistochemical or cytogenetic investigations; thus, the clinical data are missing partially [5], [11], [22], [24]. The initial treatment for all reported cases was radical or inguinal orchidectomy [11], [8]. There is no evidence to support additional therapy in patients with a disease clinically confined to the testicle. Dissection of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes should be considered with pathology suggestive of malignant features or if small-volume metastatic disease is present. If performed, it should be immediately after the orchidectomy. A very poor prognosis is expected for patients with unresectable metastatic, widespread disease [6]. There is no consensus about the treatment for metastatic disease, which may include chemotherapy [11], [8] and/or radiation therapy [12]. In the reported cases of AGCTT, three were treated with chemotherapy. One received cisplatin and doxorubicin 121 months after initial diagnosis and died from disease 13 months later. The next was treated with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection followed by one cycle of etoposide, had a recurrence treated with radical inguinal lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy; and was alive 2 months after the last therapy. The last patient received six cycles of BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) followed by metastasectomy of the right lung and was alive at 39 months after initial diagnosis. Interestingly, Harrison et al. [13] reported an advanced AGCTT partially responding to an angiogenesis inhibitor after initially resisting cytotoxic chemotherapy. Their patient enrolled in a phase I study of pazopanib (GW-786034, GlaxoSmithKline), an oral multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2, and -3; platelet-derived growth factor receptor-β; and c-kit. He was treated at the recommended phase II dose (800 mg by mouth daily) and tolerated this therapy well, and ≈32 months after his initial diagnosis the patient died from his disease.
Table 1

The morphological and clinical data of the cases reported to date of AGCTT. Modified from Schubert et al. [35].

CaseAge, yearsTestisSigns and duration, yearsEndocrine symptomsSize, cmFollow-up, yearsSource
135Right15Gynaecomastia98.5 NEDLaskowski [14]
221LeftIncidentalGynaecomastiaMicroscopicAutopsy findingCohen and Diamond [15]
353Right1Gynaecomastia>10NSMassachusetts General Hospital [16]
452Right5None13NSMelicow [17]
541Left8Gynaecomastia10.10.42 DODMostofi et al. [18]
653Right2Gynaecomastia1017 NEDMarshall et al. [19]
744RightFew monthsNone3.53 NEDTalerman [20]
841RightNSNone1.8NSGaylis et al. [21]
983LeftNSNoneNSDOCDüe et al. [22]
1061Right0.17None52 NEDNistal et al. [23]
1126Left0.58Gynaecomastia1014 NEDMatoska et al. [12]
12NSNSNSNSNSNSSasano et al. [24]
1342LeftNSNoneNSAWDMonobe and Manabe [25]
1457Right10None2.53 years DOCJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
1555LeftNot knownNone1.3NSJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
1660LeftMany yearsNone711.17 DODJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
1739Left2None43 NEDJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
1816LeftIncidentalNone1.80.33 NEDJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
1929RightIncidentalNone7.51.17 AWDJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
2076LeftIncidentalNone0.70.08 NEDJimenez-Quintero et al. [11]
21NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
22NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
23NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
24NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
25NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
26NSNSNSNSNSNSRenshaw et al. [26]
2751Left0.17Incidental71.08 NEDMorgan and Brame [27]
2848Right3None50.58 NEDAl-Bozom et al. [28]
2954LeftIncidentalNoneNSNSWang et al. [29]
3033NSIncidentalNone1NSGuzzo et al. [30]
3151LeftIncidentalNoneNS6 AWDSuppiah et al. [9]
3259Left2None154 NEDHisano et al. [31]
3332LeftIncidentalNone1.98NSArzola et al. [32]
3477LeftIncidentalNone4NSLópez [33]
3545RightMonthsNone6.52 NEDDitonno et al. [6]
3612Left5None10NSGupta et al. [4]
3755NSLung metastasesNoneNSNSHammerich et al. [8]
3828LeftIncidentalNone2.6NSSong et al. [34]
3921LeftIncidentalNone12 NEDHanson and Ambaye [5]
4077RightNSNS2.5NSLima et al. [1]
4122LeftNSNS1NSLima et al. [1]
4240LeftNSNS2.1NSLima et al. [1]
4378LeftIncidentalNone131.92 NEDSchubert et al. [35]
4437LeftIncidentalNone4.22 NEDMiliaras et al. [2]
4522Left0.75None4.6NSTanner et al. [36]
4648Left0.25None21 NEDPresent case

NS, not specified; NED, no evidence of disease; DOD, dead of disease; AWD, alive with disease; DOC, death from other cause.

Jimenez-Quintero et al. [11] suggested that haemorrhage, a necrosis size of >7.0 cm, and presence of lymphovascular invasion, might be indicative of malignancy because these characteristics were present in the malignant cases they identified. In a recent attempt to find variables for malignancy prediction, Hanson and Ambaye [5] evaluated laterality, patient age, presence of gynaecomastia, presence of mitoses, necrosis, and tumour size. Of the variables analysed, only a tumour size of >5.0 cm showed statistical significance. US of the abdomen and testis, coupled with clinical examination, may be sufficient in cases thought to have low malignant potential [11]. More extensive follow-up may be warranted with larger tumours or tumours deemed to be aggressive. A follow-up protocol suggested is an abdominal and testicular US along with chest X-ray, with a CT of the abdomen and pelvis every 6 months. The duration of follow-up is not well-defined; however, long-term follow-up is mandatory because metastasis has been found after 10 years of treatment [6].

Conclusion

Further reporting every case of AGCTT, to allow thorough analysis, is necessary to identify factors that can reliably predict tumour behaviour and to optimise methods of diagnosis and treatment together with classic means of follow-up. Long-term follow-up with a sufficient number of cases may be needed to define optimal treatment options for patients with this rare tumour.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Source of Funding

None.
  35 in total

1.  Adult granulosa cell tumor of the testicle.

Authors:  Richard W Norman; Anna Sheridan-Jonah; Jennifer Merrimen; Rekha Gupta
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 2.  Adult testicular granulosa cell tumor: a review of the literature for clinicopathologic predictors of malignancy.

Authors:  Joshua Anspach Hanson; Abiy B Ambaye
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  A rare testicular solid mass in children: Juvenile granulosa cell tumour of testis.

Authors:  Julie Couture; Stéphane Bolduc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Granulosa cell tumor of the adult type: a case report and review of the literature of a very rare testicular tumor.

Authors:  I A Al-Bozom; S R El-Faqih; S H Hassan; A E El-Tiraifi; R F Talic
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Pure granulosa cell tumour of the testis. Report of a case and review of the literature.

Authors:  A Talerman
Journal:  Appl Pathol       Date:  1985

6.  Testicular granulosa cell tumor of adult type: a new case and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pasquale Ditonno; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Michele Battaglia; Vito Mancini; Silvano Palazzo; Senia Trabucco; Carlo Bettocchi; Francesco Paolo Selvaggi
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 7.  Malignant advanced granulosa cell tumor of the adult testis: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kai H Hammerich; Stephanie Hille; Gustavo E Ayala; Thomas M Wheeler; Rainer Engers; Rolf Ackermann; Volker Mueller-Mattheis
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Granulosa cell tumor of the adult testis: ultrastructural and ultrasonographic characteristics.

Authors:  F D Gaylis; C August; A Yeldandi; A Nemcek; J Garnett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Testicular granulosa cell tumor, adult type.

Authors:  Anshu Gupta; S K Mathur; Chada Pradeep Reddy; B Arora
Journal:  Indian J Pathol Microbiol       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.740

10.  Adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the testis. Report of a case.

Authors:  José I López
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr
View more
  1 in total

1.  Metastatic Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Testis: Clinical Presentation and Management.

Authors:  Anand Mohapatra; Aaron M Potretzke; Brent A Knight; Min Han; Robert S Figenshau
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2016-05-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.