Literature DB >> 26966400

Quebec public funding facilitates fertility preservation for male cancer patients.

M B Herrero1, A García1, W Buckett1, T Tulandi1, P Chan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sperm cryopreservation remains the only clinically feasible option to preserve male fertility. The quality of counselling provided by the treating physicians and the cost of sperm cryopreservation can both influence a patient's decision about whether to preserve sperm. On 5 August 2010, the Quebec government introduced provincial coverage of assisted reproductive technologies, with sperm cryopreservation included as a covered service. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether and how such a program affects the behaviour of cancer patients with respect to sperm cryopreservation.
METHODS: We analyzed the database derived from male patients undergoing sperm cryopreservation from August 2008 to August 2012 at our centre. The retrieved data included patient age, male infertility or oncologic diagnosis, sperm quality parameters, and details about the number of visits for sperm cryopreservation.
RESULTS: The number of cancer patients who cryopreserved sperm before and after the policy change did not differ significantly, but a marked increase in the number of non-cancer patients was observed. Further analysis revealed that, after implementation of the public funding program, the total number of sperm cryopreservation sessions per patient increased significantly in cancer patients but not in non-cancer patients.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that cancer patients who are willing to freeze sperm are keen to return for more sessions of sperm banking when no fees are associated with the service. Those findings suggest that cost reduction is an important factor for improving delivery of fertility preservation services to male cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Male fertility preservation; assisted reproductive technologies; costs

Year:  2016        PMID: 26966400      PMCID: PMC4754056          DOI: 10.3747/co.23.2793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  18 in total

1.  Fertility preservation practices among Ontario oncologists.

Authors:  Samantha Yee; Esme Fuller-Thomson; Angela Lau; Ellen M Greenblatt
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Public funding of and access to in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Togas Tulandi; Leonora King; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Fertilization and embryo development with spermatozoa obtained from testicular sperm extraction into oocytes generated from human chorionic gonadotropin-primed in vitro maturation cycles.

Authors:  Weon-Young Son; Jin-Tae Chung; Sara Henderson; Shauna Reinblatt; William Buckett; Peter T K Chan; Hananel Holzer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Psychological impact of infertility.

Authors:  Tara M Cousineau; Alice D Domar
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 5.  Cryopreservation of human genetic material.

Authors:  Yoel Shufaro; Joseph G Schenker
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Utilization of infertility services: how much does money matter?

Authors:  J Farley Ordovensky Staniec; Natalie J Webb
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Banking on Fatherhood: pilot studies of a computerized educational tool on sperm banking before cancer treatment.

Authors:  Eric Huyghe; Paul Martinetti; Dawen Sui; Leslie R Schover
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Universal coverage of IVF pays off.

Authors:  M P Vélez; M P Connolly; I-J Kadoch; S Phillips; F Bissonnette
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment.

Authors:  H Volgsten; A Skoog Svanberg; L Ekselius; O Lundkvist; I Sundström Poromaa
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Looking at Infertility Treatment through The Lens of The Meaning of Life: The Effect of Group Logotherapy on Psychological Distress in Infertile Women.

Authors:  Leili Mosalanejad; Anahita Khodabakshi Koolee
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of a formal oncofertility program on fertility preservation rates-first year experience.

Authors:  Diana M Lopategui; Emad Ibrahim; Teodoro C Aballa; Nancy L Brackett; Raphael Yechieli; Julio C Barredo; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.