Literature DB >> 26966221

Genome Sequences of Two Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Race 1 Strains, Isolated from Tomato Fields in California.

Shree P Thapa1, Gitta Coaker2.   

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato race 1 strains have evolved to overcome genetic resistance in tomato. Here, we present the draft genome sequences of two race 1 P. syringae pv. tomato strains, A9 and 407, isolated from diseased tomato plants in California.
Copyright © 2016 Thapa and Coaker.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26966221      PMCID: PMC4786671          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01671-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato causes bacterial speck of tomato, which is one of the most persistent bacterial diseases in tomato worldwide. In resistant genotypes, the race 0 P. syringae pv. tomato type III effectors AvrPto and AvrPtoB are recognized by the tomato proteins Pto and Prf (1, 2). However, P. syringae pv. tomato race 1 strains are able to overcome genetic resistance in tomato by modifying the presence and expression of AvrPto and AvrPtoB (3, 4). Despite the historical success of Pto-mediated resistance, race 1 strains now predominate (4, 5). P. syringae pv. tomato race 1 was first detected in 1986 in Canada and in 1993 in California, the primary production area for processing tomato cultivars in the United States (6, 7). The vast majority of strains collected from 2005 to 2007 were race 1, and we were unable to identify any race 0 strains in 2007, 2008, or 2009 from infected tomato plants in California (4, 5). Here, we report the draft genome sequences of P. syringae pv. tomato A9 and P. syringae pv. tomato 407, isolated from infected tomato plants in California. Both strains are race 1, but P. syringae pv. tomato A9 exhibits enhanced bacterial growth and disease symptoms in tomato compared to P. syringae pv. tomato 407 (8). Genomic DNA was sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 (2 × 150-bp paired-end reads) at the Genome Center at the UC Davis DNA Technologies Core Facility. After the raw sequences were trimmed and their quality filtered (>Q30), the remaining reads were assembled de novo using the SPAdes assembler and draft genomes were generated for each isolate (9). Each genome was annotated with PROKKA (10) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/annotation_prok). The final draft assembly of the P. syringae pv. tomato A9 genome consists of 188 contigs (>200 bp) with 70-fold genome coverage. P. syringae pv. tomato A9 harbors a single circular genome of 6,314,445 bp, with a G+C content of 57.9%. The genome of the P. syringae pv. tomato A9 strain contains 5,749 predicted coding sequences (CDSs), 1 rRNA operon, and 60 tRNA genes; and the genome of P. syringae pv. tomato 407 contains 5,702 predicted CDSs, 1 rRNA operon, and 57 tRNA genes. The final draft assembly of the P. syringae pv. tomato 407 genome consists of 192 contigs (>200 bp) with 65-fold genome coverage. P. syringae pv. tomato 407 harbors a single circular genome of 6,264,873 bp with a G+C content of 55.8%. Among the 57 type III effectors present in the P. syringae pangenome (11), 27 are present in both P. syringae pv. tomato A9 and P. syringae pv. tomato 407. Detailed comparisons of related Pseudomonas strains exhibiting variable virulence will facilitate insight into molecular mechanisms regulating virulence and adaptation.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The sequences have been deposited as whole-genome shotgun projects in GenBank under the accession numbers LNKY00000000 for P. syringae pv. tomato A9 and LNKZ00000000 for P. syringae pv. tomato 407.
  9 in total

1.  SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing.

Authors:  Anton Bankevich; Sergey Nurk; Dmitry Antipov; Alexey A Gurevich; Mikhail Dvorkin; Alexander S Kulikov; Valery M Lesin; Sergey I Nikolenko; Son Pham; Andrey D Prjibelski; Alexey V Pyshkin; Alexander V Sirotkin; Nikolay Vyahhi; Glenn Tesler; Max A Alekseyev; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Molecular and evolutionary analyses of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato race 1.

Authors:  Suparat Kunkeaw; Steven Tan; Gitta Coaker
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Identification of QTLs controlling resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato race 1 strains from the wild tomato, Solanum habrochaites LA1777.

Authors:  Shree Prasad Thapa; Eugene M Miyao; R Michael Davis; Gitta Coaker
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Pseudomonas syringae type III effector repertoires: last words in endless arguments.

Authors:  Magdalen Lindeberg; Sébastien Cunnac; Alan Collmer
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato.

Authors:  G B Martin; S H Brommonschenkel; J Chunwongse; A Frary; M W Ganal; R Spivey; T Wu; E D Earle; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-11-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Tomato Prf is a member of the leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within the Pto kinase gene cluster.

Authors:  J M Salmeron; G E Oldroyd; C M Rommens; S R Scofield; H S Kim; D T Lavelle; D Dahlbeck; B J Staskawicz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-12       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Pto- and Prf-mediated recognition of AvrPto and AvrPtoB restricts the ability of diverse pseudomonas syringae pathovars to infect tomato.

Authors:  Nai-Chun Lin; Gregory B Martin
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is genetically monomorphic and under strong selection to evade tomato immunity.

Authors:  Rongman Cai; James Lewis; Shuangchun Yan; Haijie Liu; Christopher R Clarke; Francesco Campanile; Nalvo F Almeida; David J Studholme; Magdalen Lindeberg; David Schneider; Massimo Zaccardelli; Joao C Setubal; Nadia P Morales-Lizcano; Adriana Bernal; Gitta Coaker; Christy Baker; Carol L Bender; Scotland Leman; Boris A Vinatzer
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.823

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Arabidopsis Elongator Subunit ELP3 and ELP4 Confer Resistance to Bacterial Speck in Tomato.

Authors:  Juliana A Pereira; Fahong Yu; Yanping Zhang; Jeffrey B Jones; Zhonglin Mou
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  fNIRS brain measures of ongoing nociception during surgical incisions under anesthesia.

Authors:  Stephen Green; Keerthana Deepti Karunakaran; Robert Labadie; Barry Kussman; Arielle Mizrahi-Arnaud; Andrea Gomez Morad; Delany Berry; David Zurakowski; Lyle Micheli; Ke Peng; David Borsook
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.212

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.