| Literature DB >> 26966003 |
Ágnes Filep1,2, Gergely H Fodor3, Fruzsina Kun-Szabó4, László Tiszlavicz5, Zsolt Rázga5, Gábor Bozsó6, Zoltán Bozóki7,8, Gábor Szabó7,8, Ferenc Peták3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological and laboratory studies have evidenced the fact that atmospheric particulate matter (PM) increases the risk of respiratory morbidity. It is well known that the smallest fraction of PM (PM1 - particulate matter having a diameter below 1 μm) penetrates the deepest into the airways. The ratio of the different size fractions in PM is highly variable, but in industrial areas PM1 can be significant. Despite these facts, the health effects of PM1 have been poorly investigated and air quality standards are based on PM10 and PM2.5 (PM having diameters below 10 μm and 2.5 μm, respectively) concentrations. Therefore, this study aimed at determining whether exposure to ambient PM1 at a near alert threshold level for PM10 has respiratory consequences in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Airway hyperresponsiveness; Ambient aerosol; Bronchial inflammation; Lung function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26966003 PMCID: PMC4785744 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-016-0332-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Fig. 1Experimental setup for PM1 exposure. PAS: photoacoustic spectrometer, OPC: optical particle counter, TEOM: tapered element oscillation microbalance
Fig. 2Average particle number size distribution in the exposure chamber. The top panel shows measured values in the whole range, the bottom panel is a zoomed view of the gray area in the top panel. Symbols are average values with SD, continuous line represents the calculated Gaussian fit
Baseline values of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory mechanical parameters (airway resistance, Raw; tissue damping, G and tissue elastance, H)
| EELV (ml/kg) | Raw (cmH2O.s/l) | G (cmH2O/l) | H (cmH2O/l) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Group | 11.2 ± 0.5 | 48.0 ± 2.4 | 955.7 ± 26.2 | 3750.0 ± 140.6 |
| Exposed Group | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 47.7 ± 2.7 | 952.3 ± 51.1 | 3643.5 ± 179.5 |
Fig. 3Changes of the respiratory mechanical parameters following methacholine challenge. Raw: airway resistance, G: tissue damping, H: tissue elastance, BL: baseline, M4-8-16: methacholine doses of 4-8-16 μg/kg/min. *: p < 0.05 vs. control group
Fig. 4Average number of basophils, neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages and total cell counts per field of view in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. *: p < 0.05 vs. control group
Fig. 5Light (a, b, d) and electron microscopic (c) images of the lungs. a: Section of a bronchus in a representative animal in the exposed group. Arrow indicates an aggregate of free dust particles inside the bronchial lumen. b: Section of the alveolar space in a representative animal in the exposed group. Arrows indicate macrophages with phagocytosed dust particles. c: Transmission electron microscopic section of a representative animal in the exposed group. Arrows indicate embedded dust particles. d: Alveolar section of a representative animal in the control group