Literature DB >> 26965932

Is Bare-Metal Stent Implantation Still Justifiable in High Bleeding Risk Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention?: A Pre-Specified Analysis From the ZEUS Trial.

Sara Ariotti1, Marianna Adamo2, Francesco Costa2, Athanasios Patialiakas3, Carlo Briguori4, Attila Thury5, Salvatore Colangelo6, Gianluca Campo7, Matteo Tebaldi7, Imre Ungi5, Stefano Tondi8, Marco Roffi9, Alberto Menozzi10, Nicoletta de Cesare11, Roberto Garbo6, Emanuele Meliga12, Luca Testa13, Henrique Mesquita Gabriel14, Marco Ferlini15, Pascal Vranckx16, Marco Valgimigli17.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the ischemic and bleeding outcomes of patients fulfilling high bleeding risk (HBR) criteria who were randomized to zotarolimus-eluting Endeavor Sprint stent (E-ZES) or bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation followed by an abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration for stable or unstable coronary artery disease.
BACKGROUND: DES instead of BMS use remains controversial in HBR patients, in whom long-term DAPT poses safety concerns.
METHODS: The ZEUS (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates) is a multinational, randomized single-blinded trial that randomized among others, in a stratified manner, 828 patients fulfilling pre-defined clinical or biochemical HBR criteria-including advanced age, indication to oral anticoagulants or other pro-hemorrhagic medications, history of bleeding and known anemia-to receive E-ZES or BMS followed by a protocol-mandated 30-day DAPT regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was the 12-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate, consisting of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization.
RESULTS: Compared with patients without, those with 1 or more HBR criteria had worse outcomes, owing to higher ischemic and bleeding risks. Among HBR patients, major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 22.6% of the E-ZES and 29% of the BMS patients (hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.57 to 0.98; p = 0.033), driven by lower myocardial infarction (3.5% vs. 10.4%; p < 0.001) and target vessel revascularization (5.9% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.005) rates in the E-ZES arm. The composite of definite or probable stent thrombosis was significantly reduced in E-ZES recipients, whereas bleeding events did not differ between stent groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Among HBR patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease, E-ZES implantation provides superior efficacy and safety as compared with conventional BMS. (Zotarolimus-Eluting Endeavor Sprint Stent in Uncertain DES Candidates [ZEUS]; NCT01385319).
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual antiplatelet therapy; high bleeding risk; zotarolimus-eluting stent(s)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26965932     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  31 in total

1.  Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy and concomitant optimal medical therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gargiulo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 2.  Single or dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI.

Authors:  Yosuke Miyazaki; Pannipa Suwannasom; Yohei Sotomi; Mohammad Abdelghani; Karthik Tummala; Yuki Katagiri; Taku Asano; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Yaping Zeng; Rafael Cavalcante; Carlos Collet; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation: to go too far is as bad as to fall short.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10

Review 4.  [Coronary interventions : Current developments for improved long-term results].

Authors:  T Seidler
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Long-Term Use of Ticagrelor in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Sara Ariotti; Giuseppe Gargiulo; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bharath Rajagopalan; Christopher Madias
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-02-07

Review 7.  Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration: Reconciling the Inconsistencies.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Stephan Windecker; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Complexity of Antiplatelet Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Sabouret; Michael P Savage; David Fischman; Francesco Costa
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.571

9.  Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Stents Optimized for Biocompatibility vs Bare-Metal Stents With a Single Month of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rahman Shah; Sunil V Rao; Samuel B Latham; David E Kandzari
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 10.  Bleeding avoidance strategies in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno; Deepak L Bhatt; C Michael Gibson; Stefan James; Takeshi Kimura; Roxana Mehran; Sunil V Rao; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Philip Urban; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Windecker; Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.