Literature DB >> 26965697

Prostate Health Index and %p2PSA Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer Pathology in Chinese Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

Peter Ka-Fung Chiu1, Fernand Mac-Moune Lai2, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh1, Wai-Man Lee1, Chi-Hang Yee1, Eddie Shu-Yin Chan1, See-Ming Hou1, Chi-Fai Ng3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance of prostate health index (PHI) and percentage prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform [-2]proPSA (%p2PSA) in predicting pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy (RP) in a Chinese population.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 135 prostate cancer patients with RP. The accuracy of preoperative %p2PSA (= p2PSA/free PSA) and PHI [= (p2PSA/free PSA) × √PSA] in predicting pathologic outcomes of RP including pT3 disease, pathologic Gleason score (pGS) ≥7, Gleason score (GS) upgrade at RP, tumor volume >0.5 ml, and Epstein criteria for significant tumor were calculated using multivariate analyses and area under the curve. The base model in multivariate analysis included age, PSA, abnormal digital rectal examination, and biopsy GS.
RESULTS: PHI was significantly higher in patients with pT3 or pGS ≥ 7 (p < 0.001), pT3 disease (p = 0.001), pGS ≥ 7 (p < 0.001), GS upgrade (p < 0.001), tumor volume >0.5 ml (p < 0.001), and Epstein criteria for significant tumor (p = 0.001). %p2PSA was also significantly higher in all the above outcomes. The risk of pT3 or pGS ≥ 7 was 16.1 % for PHI < 35 and 60.8 % for PHI > 35 (sensitivity 84.2 %, specificity of 60.3 %), and the risk of tumor volume >0.5 ml was 25.5 % for PHI < 35 and 72.6 % for PHI > 35 (sensitivity 79.1 %, specificity 67.2 %). In multivariate analysis, adding %p2PSA or PHI to the base model significantly improved the accuracy (area under the curve) in predicting pT3 or pGS ≥ 7 (by 7.2-7.9 %), tumor volume >0.5 ml (by 10.3-12.8 %), and Epstein criteria for significant tumor (by 13.9-15.9 %). Net clinical benefit was observed in decision curve analyses for prediction of both tumor volume >0.5 ml, and pT3 or pGS ≥ 7.
CONCLUSIONS: Both PHI and %p2PSA predict aggressive and significant pathologies in RP in Chinese men. This enabled identification of nonaggressive cancers for better counseling on active surveillance or treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26965697     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5183-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  8 in total

1.  Does the Prostate Health Index Depend on Tumor Volume?-A Study on 196 Patients after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Frank Friedersdorff; Britt Groß; Andreas Maxeiner; Klaus Jung; Kurt Miller; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch; Ergin Kilic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Explication of the roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) as diagnostic and predictor tools for prostate cancer in equivocal PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Anmar M Nassir; Hala F M Kamel
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Assessment on clinical value of prostate health index in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guangying Zhang; Yanyan Li; Chao Li; Na Li; Zhanzhan Li; Qin Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in estimating the histological diameter of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Po-Fan Hsieh; Tzung-Ruei Li; Wei-Ching Lin; Han Chang; Chi-Ping Huang; Chao-Hsiang Chang; Chi-Rei Yang; Chin-Chung Yeh; Wen-Chin Huang; Hsi-Chin Wu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 5.  Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice.

Authors:  Belén Pastor-Navarro; José Rubio-Briones; Ángel Borque-Fernando; Luis M Esteban; Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig; José Antonio López-Guerrero
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Peter Ka-Fung Chiu; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Wai-Man Lee; Chi-Hang Yee; Eddie Shu-Yin Chan; See-Ming Hou; Chi-Fai Ng
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-08-31

7.  Prospective performance of the Prostate Health Index in prostate cancer detection in the first prostate biopsy of men with a total prostatic specific antigen of 4-10 ng/mL and negative digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Supon Sriplakich; Bannakij Lojanapiwat; Wilaiwan Chongruksut; Siwat Phuriyaphan; Pruit Kitirattakarn; Jakrit Jun-Ou; Akara Amantakul
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2018-02-15

8.  Preoperative prostate health index and %p2PSA as the significant biomarkers of postoperative pathological outcomes of prostate cancer in Korean males: A prospective multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Hongzoo Park; Sang Wook Lee; Geehyun Song; Tae Wook Kang; Jae Hung Jung; Hyun Chul Chung; Sung Jin Kim; Jong Yeon Park; Tae Young Shin; Jeong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.