Literature DB >> 26965196

State Scope of Practice Laws, Nurse-Midwifery Workforce, and Childbirth Procedures and Outcomes.

Y Tony Yang1, Laura B Attanasio2, Katy B Kozhimannil2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite research indicating that health, cost, and quality of care outcomes in midwife-led maternity care are comparable with and in some case preferable to those for patients with physician-led care, midwifery plays a more important role in some U.S. states than in others. However, this variability is not well-understood.
OBJECTIVES: This study estimates the association between state scope of practice laws related to the autonomy of midwifery practice with the certified nurse-midwifery (CNM) workforce, access to midwife-attended births, and childbirth-related procedures and outcomes.
METHODS: Using multivariate regression models, we analyzed Natality Detail File data from births occurring from 2009 to 2011. Each state was classified regarding autonomous midwifery practice (not requiring supervision or contractual agreements) based on Lexis legal search.
RESULTS: States with autonomous practice laws had an average of 4.85 CNMs per 1,000 births, compared with 2.17 in states where CNM practice is subject to collaborative agreement. In states with autonomous CNM practice, women had higher odds of having a CNM-attended birth (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.59; p = .004), compared with women in states where midwifery is subject to collaborative agreement. In addition, women in states with autonomous practice had lower odds of cesarean delivery (AOR, 0.87; p = .016), preterm birth (AOR, 0.87; p < .001), and low birth weight (AOR, 0.89; p = .001), compared with women in states without such practice.
CONCLUSIONS: States with regulations that support autonomous midwifery practice have a larger nurse-midwifery workforce, and a greater proportion of CNM-attended births. Correlations between autonomous practice laws and better birth outcomes suggest future policy efforts to enhance access to midwifery services may be beneficial to pregnancy outcomes and infant health.
Copyright © 2016 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26965196     DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Issues        ISSN: 1049-3867


  5 in total

1.  The Birth Education Starts Today Video on Birth Care Options: Evaluation With University Students.

Authors:  Elizabeth Soliday; Gina Ord
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2020-01-01

2.  Nature and scope of certified nurse-midwifery practice: A workforce study.

Authors:  Marie Hastings-Tolsma; Sarah Wilcox Foster; Mary C Brucker; Priscilla Nodine; Rebecca Burpo; Barbara Camune; Jackie Griggs; Tiffany J Callahan
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Race, Medicaid Coverage, and Equity in Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Clare C Brown; Caroline E Adams; Jennifer E Moore
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2021-01-21

4.  Mapping integration of midwives across the United States: Impact on access, equity, and outcomes.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Kathrin Stoll; Marian MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Renee Cramer; Melissa Cheyney; Timothy Fisher; Emma Butt; Y Tony Yang; Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Geospatial variation in caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Jennifer Vanderlaan; Johnathan A Edwards; Anne Dunlop
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.