Literature DB >> 26964803

PROSPECT Eligibility and Clinical Outcomes: Results From the Pan-Canadian Rectal Cancer Consortium.

Dominick Bossé1, Jamison Mercer2, Soundouss Raissouni3, Kristopher Dennis4, Rachel Goodwin4, Di Jiang5, Erin Powell2, Aalok Kumar3, Richard Lee-Ying6, Julie Price-Hiller7, Daniel Y C Heng3, Patricia A Tang3, Anthony MacLean8, Winson Y Cheung6, Michael M Vickers4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The PROSPECT trial (N1048) is evaluating the selective use of chemoradiation in patients with cT2N1 and cT3N0-1 rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-sparing low anterior resection. We evaluated outcomes of PROSPECT-eligible and -ineligible patients from a multi-institutional database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received chemoradiation and low anterior resection from 2005 to 2014 were retrospectively collected from 5 Canadian centers. Overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and time to local recurrence (LR) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a multivariate analysis was performed adjusting for prognostic factors.
RESULTS: A total of 566 (37%) of 1531 patients met the PROSPECT eligibility criteria. Eligible patients were more likely to have better PS (P = .0003) and negative circumferential resection margin (P < .0001). PROSPECT eligibility was associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.91), overall survival (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.95), and RFS (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54-0.86) in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, only RFS remained significantly improved for PROSPECT-eligible patients (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.57-1.00, P = .0499). The 3-year DFS and freedom from LR for PROSPECT-eligible patients were 79.1% and 97.4%, respectively, compared to 71.1% and 96.8% for PROSPECT-ineligible patients.
CONCLUSION: Real-world data corroborate the eligibility criteria used in the PROSPECT study; the criteria identify a subgroup of patients in whom risk of recurrence is lower and in whom selective use of chemoradiation should be actively examined.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiation; Clinical trial; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Oxaliplatin; Toxicity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26964803     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  11 in total

Review 1.  Continued Improvement in Rectal Cancer Survival Outcomes Will Require True Multidisciplinary Treatment Approaches.

Authors:  Sonia Cohen; Liliana Bordeianou
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Can we eliminate neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in favor of neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy for select stage II/III rectal adenocarcinomas: Analysis of the National Cancer Data base.

Authors:  Richard J Cassidy; Yuan Liu; Kirtesh Patel; Jim Zhong; Conor E Steuer; David A Kooby; Maria C Russell; Theresa W Gillespie; Jerome C Landry
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Measuring Rectal Cancer Tumor Height: Concordance Between Clinical Examination and MRI.

Authors:  Shannon M Navarro; Shuai Chen; Linda M Farkas
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Association of mismatch repair status with survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Biao Ye; Yi-Kan Cheng; Lin Zhang; Yi-Feng Zou; Ping Chen; Yan-Hong Deng; Yan Huang; Jian-Hong Peng; Xiao-Jian Wu; Ping Lan
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-09-07

5.  Lateral lymph node dissection and urogenital function with and without neoadjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Leonardo Alfonso Bustamante-Lopez; Matthew Albert; John R T Monson
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 0.496

6.  The role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for locally-advanced rectal cancer with resectable synchronous metastasis.

Authors:  Croix C Fossum; Jasim Y Alabbad; Lindsay B Romak; Christopher L Hallemeier; Michael G Haddock; Marianne Huebner; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-08

Review 7.  Locally advanced rectal cancer: management challenges.

Authors:  R F Kokelaar; M D Evans; M Davies; D A Harris; J Beynon
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Jili Wang; Hao Yu; Xiaofei Cheng; Xinke Li; Xuan Zhu; Xiangming Xu; Jianjiang Lin; Xin Chen; Senxiang Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Critical reappraisal of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced colon cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Cheng Chen; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Ching-Chun Li; Ching-Wen Huang; Tsung-Kun Chang; Wei-Chih Su; Po-Jung Chen; Tzu-Chieh Yin; Chun-Ming Huang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jin K Kim; Michael R Marco; Campbell S D Roxburgh; Chin-Tung Chen; Andrea Cercek; Paul Strombom; Larissa K F Temple; Garrett M Nash; Jose G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Rona Yaeger; Zsofia K Stadler; Mithat Gonen; Neil H Segal; Diane L Reidy; Anna Varghese; Jinru Shia; Efsevia Vakiani; Abraham J Wu; Paul B Romesser; Christopher H Crane; Marc J Gollub; Leonard Saltz; J Joshua Smith; Martin R Weiser; Sujata Patil; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.