| Literature DB >> 26964783 |
Bernd Rechel1, Martin McKee2, Marion Haas3, Gregory P Marchildon4, Frederic Bousquet5, Miriam Blümel6, Alexander Geissler7, Ewout van Ginneken8, Toni Ashton9, Ingrid Sperre Saunes10, Anders Anell11, Wilm Quentin12, Richard Saltman13, Steven Culler14, Andrew Barnes15, Willy Palm16, Ellen Nolte17.
Abstract
This article maps current approaches to public reporting on waiting times, patient experience and aggregate measures of quality and safety in 11 high-income countries (Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States). Using a questionnaire-based survey of key national informants, we found that the data most commonly made available to the public are on waiting times for hospital treatment, being reported for major hospitals in seven countries. Information on patient experience at hospital level is also made available in many countries, but it is not generally available in respect of primary care services. Only one of the 11 countries (England) publishes composite measures of overall quality and safety of care that allow the ranking of providers of hospital care. Similarly, the publication of information on outcomes of individual physicians remains rare. We conclude that public reporting of aggregate measures of quality and safety, as well as of outcomes of individual physicians, remain relatively uncommon. This is likely to be due to both unresolved methodological and ethical problems and concerns that public reporting may lead to unintended consequences.Entities:
Keywords: Benchmarking; Patient satisfaction; Quality of health care
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26964783 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Policy ISSN: 0168-8510 Impact factor: 2.980