| Literature DB >> 26964059 |
Florian Gehre1,2, Samrat Kumar3, Lindsay Kendall4, Mebrat Ejo1,5, Oumie Secka2, Boatema Ofori-Anyinam1,2, Emmanuel Abatih3, Martin Antonio2, Dirk Berkvens3, Bouke C de Jong1,2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phylogenetically distinct Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages differ in their phenotypes and pathogenicity. Consequently, understanding mycobacterial population structures phylogeographically is essential for design, interpretation and generalizability of clinical trials. Comprehensive efforts are lacking to date to establish the West African mycobacterial population structure on a sub-continental scale, which has diagnostic implications and can inform the design of clinical TB trials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26964059 PMCID: PMC4786107 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Geospatial distribution (absolute numbers) of 3580 spoligotypes belonging to 6 identified West African mycobacterial lineages (L1-L6) and 32 families, which were East African Indian (EAI) families EAI 1, EAI 2, EAI 4, EAI 5; Family 33, Family 34, Family 35, Family 36; Beijing family; Central Asian (CAS) family; Haarlem (H) families H1, H2, H3; H37Rv-like family; Latin-American-Mediterranean (LAM) families LAM 1, LAM 2, LAM 3, LAM 7, LAM 8, LAM 9, LAM 10; S family; T families T1, T2, T3, T4; X families X1, X2, X3; M. africanum West Africa 1 and 2; M. bovis.
| Mycobacterial Lineages | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | L5 | L6 | Animal strains | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indo-Oceanic | East Asian | Central Asian | Euro American | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mycobacterial Family | East African Indian (EAI) | Family | Beijing | CAS | Haarlem | H37Rv-like | Latin-American-Mediterranean (LAM) | S | Family | T families | X families | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Site ID | Ref. | Study year | No. Study isolates | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 33 | 34 | 35 | H1 | H2 | H3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 36 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | X1 | X2 | X3 | 1 | 2 | |||||
| [ | 2005–2006 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 60 | 12 | 0 | |
| [ | 2001 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 1 | |
| [ | 2010 | 119 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 3 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| No data available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| [ | 2002–2009 | 884 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 0 | 26 | 2 | 63 | 6 | 67 | 5 | 38 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 11 | 71 | 34 | 1 | 1 | 113 | 6 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 324 | 0 | |
| This study | 2012 | 280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 33 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 88 | 0 | |
| [ | 2007–2009 | 162 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 58 | 2 | 1 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 23 | 4 | 0 | |
| [ | 1989–2008 | 414 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 59 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 189 | 0 | |
| [ | 2005–2010 | 120 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 34 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 0 | |
| [ | 2008–2009 | 194 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 151 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| [ | 1994–1995 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| No data available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| [ | 2006–2010 | 126 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 47 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 34 | 1 | |
| [ | 2008–2012 | 87 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| [ | 2006–2008 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| [ | 2006 | 60 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
| [ | 2009–2010 | 405 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 46 | 0 | 4 | |
| [ | 2008–2009 | 81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 0 | 0 | |
| [ | 1997–2011 | 79 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | |
| [ | 1994–1995 | 69 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
| [ | 2003–2004 | 97 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 27 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 17 | 0 | |
| No data available | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 3580 | 27 | 1 | 7 | 67 | 53 | 34 | 4 | 97 | 17 | 182 | 8 | 224 | 15 | 73 | 24 | 17 | 18 | 44 | 202 | 709 | 20 | 6 | 679 | 45 | 39 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 49 | 175 | 712 | 8 | |||
1excluding designated mixed infections
Fig 1Geospatial distribution of major mycobacterial families within each lineage in West Africa.
For each of the six present lineages, the major families are mapped. The eight overall major families highlighted with asterisks (*) cause 84% of all pulmonary TB in the region and comprise M. africanum West Africa 1 (MAF1), M. africanum West Africa 2 (MAF2), LAM9, LAM10, Haarlem 1, Haarlem 3 and Beijing families.
Fig 2Phylogeographic analysis of major geographically restricted families using GenGIS.
A.) Phylogeography, in which an UPGMA tree that includes MAF1, MAF2, Haarlem 3 and LAM10 spoligotypes, is superimposed onto the geographical distribution map. Each spoligotype in the tree is linked to its actual location on the map and the crossing-overs of connecting lines can be counted. In case of no geographical separation crossings of the connecting lines would occur at random. If less crossings are observed than expected by chance geographical separation occurs, as for instance, at a geographic tree axis angle of 228.1° of these major four families. B) Linear axis plot scanning for axis angles of the superimposed phylogenetic tree onto the map, in which geographic separation occurs. The red line indicates the minimum number of crossings that would have been expected by chance at significance level p = 0.001. Every orientation of the tree onto the map that results in less crossings than expected by chance (9759.5) lies below the line and indicates significant geographical separation and can be observed between 110°-131°, 151°-170° and 217°- 270°. The most extreme geographical separation with the least crossings (9144) occurs at an angle of 228.1° (arrow) and is plotted in 2A.
Fig 3Longitudinal development of the M. tuberculosis complex in The Gambia between 2002–2010.
1164 smear-positive pulmonary TB isolates were spoligotyped and assigned to lineages. We analyzed the longitudinal development of the six prevalent lineages over time, using logistic regression modelling for grouped data. As no lineage/time interaction or time as main effect was detected, the average prevalence and 95% confidence intervals for each lineage were estimated as follows: Euro-American: 57.2% (54.4%-60.0%); M. africanum West Africa 2 (MAF2): 35.4% (32.7%-38.2%); Indo-Oceanic: 4.3% (3.3%-5.6%); East Asian (Beijing): 2.5% (1.7%-3.6%); M. africanum West Africa 1 (MAF1): 1.0% (0.4%-2.4%); East African Indian 0.8% (0.2%-3.2%).