Literature DB >> 26963763

They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization.

Nour Kteily1, Gordon Hodson2, Emile Bruneau3.   

Abstract

Although the act of dehumanizing an outgroup is a pervasive and potent intergroup process that drives discrimination and conflict, no formal research has examined the consequences of being dehumanized by an outgroup-that is, "metadehumanization." Across 10 studies (N = 3,440) involving several real-world conflicts spanning 3 continents, we provide the first empirical evidence that metadehumanization (a) plays a central role in outgroup aggression that is (b) mediated by outgroup dehumanization, and (c) distinct from metaprejudice. Studies 1a and 1b demonstrate experimentally that Americans who learn that Arabs (Study 1a) or Muslims (Study 1b) blatantly dehumanize Americans are more likely to dehumanize that outgroup in return; by contrast, experimentally increasing outgroup dehumanization did not increase metadehumanization (Study 1c). Using correlational data, Study 2 documents indirect effects of metadehumanization on Americans' support for aggressive policies toward Arabs (e.g., torture) via Arab dehumanization. In the context of Hungarians and ethnic minority Roma, Study 3 shows that the pathway for Hungarians from metadehumanization to aggression through outgroup dehumanization holds controlling for outgroup prejudice. Study 4 examines Israelis' metaperceptions with respect to Palestinians, showing that: (a) feeling dehumanized (i.e., metadehumanization) is distinct from feeling disliked (i.e., metaprejudice), and (b) metadehumanization uniquely influences aggression through outgroup dehumanization, controlling for metaprejudice. Studies 5a and 5b explore Americans' metaperceptions regarding ISIS and Iran. We document a dehumanization-specific pathway from metadehumanization to aggressive attitudes and behavior that is distinct from the path from metaprejudice through prejudice to aggression. In Study 6, American participants learning that Muslims humanize Americans (i.e., metahumanization) humanize Muslims in turn. Finally, Study 7 experimentally contrasts metadehumanization and metahumanization primes, and shows that resulting differences in outgroup dehumanization are mediated by (a) perceived identity threat, and (b) a general desire to reciprocate the outgroup's perceptions of the ingroup. In summary, our research outlines how and why metadehumanization contributes to cycles of ongoing violence and animosity, providing direction for future research and policy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26963763     DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  19 in total

1.  Effects of Minimal Grouping On Implicit Prejudice, Infrahumanization, and Neural Processing Despite Orthogonal Social Categorizations.

Authors:  Jeremy C Simon; Jennifer N Gutsell
Journal:  Group Process Intergroup Relat       Date:  2019-05-06

2.  Cognitive and neural bases of decision-making causing civilian casualties during intergroup conflict.

Authors:  Xiaochun Han; Shuai Zhou; Nardine Fahoum; Taoyu Wu; Tianyu Gao; Simone Shamay-Tsoory; Michele J Gelfand; Xinhuai Wu; Shihui Han
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-03-08

Review 3.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.

Authors:  Jay J Van Bavel; Katherine Baicker; Paulo S Boggio; Valerio Capraro; Aleksandra Cichocka; Mina Cikara; Molly J Crockett; Alia J Crum; Karen M Douglas; James N Druckman; John Drury; Oeindrila Dube; Naomi Ellemers; Eli J Finkel; James H Fowler; Michele Gelfand; Shihui Han; S Alexander Haslam; Jolanda Jetten; Shinobu Kitayama; Dean Mobbs; Lucy E Napper; Dominic J Packer; Gordon Pennycook; Ellen Peters; Richard E Petty; David G Rand; Stephen D Reicher; Simone Schnall; Azim Shariff; Linda J Skitka; Sandra Susan Smith; Cass R Sunstein; Nassim Tabri; Joshua A Tucker; Sander van der Linden; Paul van Lange; Kim A Weeden; Michael J A Wohl; Jamil Zaki; Sean R Zion; Robb Willer
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-04-30

Review 4.  The Psychology of Morality: A Review and Analysis of Empirical Studies Published From 1940 Through 2017.

Authors:  Naomi Ellemers; Jojanneke van der Toorn; Yavor Paunov; Thed van Leeuwen
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-01-18

5.  Political violence and inaccurate metaperceptions.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Exposure to a media intervention helps promote support for peace in Colombia.

Authors:  Emile Bruneau; Andrés Casas; Boaz Hameiri; Nour Kteily
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-04-14

7.  Understanding and combating misperceived polarization.

Authors:  Jeffrey Lees; Mina Cikara
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Understanding the Terrorist Mind.

Authors:  Emile Bruneau
Journal:  Cerebrum       Date:  2016-11-01

9.  The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare.

Authors:  Emile Bruneau; Nour Kteily
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interventions Highlighting Hypocrisy Reduce Collective Blame of Muslims for Individual Acts of Violence and Assuage Anti-Muslim Hostility.

Authors:  Emile Bruneau; Nour Kteily; Emily Falk
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.