Literature DB >> 26963703

All in the first glance: first fixation predicts individual differences in valence bias.

Maital Neta1, Tien T Tong1, Monica L Rosen1, Alex Enersen1, M Justin Kim2, Michael D Dodd1.   

Abstract

Surprised expressions are interpreted as negative by some people, and as positive by others. When compared to fearful expressions, which are consistently rated as negative, surprise and fear share similar morphological structures (e.g. widened eyes), but these similarities are primarily in the upper part of the face (eyes). We hypothesised, then, that individuals would be more likely to interpret surprise positively when fixating faster to the lower part of the face (mouth). Participants rated surprised and fearful faces as either positive or negative while eye movements were recorded. Positive ratings of surprise were associated with longer fixation on the mouth than negative ratings. There were also individual differences in fixation patterns, with individuals who fixated the mouth earlier exhibiting increased positive ratings. These findings suggest that there are meaningful individual differences in how people process faces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotional ambiguity; eye tracking; fear; individual differences; surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26963703      PMCID: PMC5018241          DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1152231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  23 in total

1.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions.

Authors:  Patrik Vuilleumier; Jorge L Armony; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Individual differences in emotion processing.

Authors:  Stephan Hamann; Turhan Canli
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces.

Authors:  Susan Sullivan; Ted Ruffman; Sam B Hutton
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-08

5.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: judgments from untrained research participants.

Authors:  Nim Tottenham; James W Tanaka; Andrew C Leon; Thomas McCarry; Marcella Nurse; Todd A Hare; David J Marcus; Alissa Westerlund; B J Casey; Charles Nelson
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-06-28       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task.

Authors:  Maital Neta; F Caroline Davis; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2011-06-27

7.  Very first impressions.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Maital Neta; Heather Linz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2006-05

8.  Neural responses to ambiguity involve domain-general and domain-specific emotion processing systems.

Authors:  Maital Neta; William M Kelley; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias.

Authors:  Maital Neta; Catherine J Norris; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2009-10

10.  Compound facial expressions of emotion.

Authors:  Shichuan Du; Yong Tao; Aleix M Martinez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

1.  Developmental differences in the visual processing of emotionally ambiguous neutral faces based on perceived valence.

Authors:  Leslie Rollins; Erin Bertero; Laurie Hunter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.