Literature DB >> 26963203

Evaluation of the Biological Behavior of Mucograft® in Human Gingival Fibroblasts: An In Vitro Study.

Rafaela S R E Lima1, Daiane C Peruzzo1, Marcelo H Napimoga2, Eduardo Saba-Chujfi1, Silvio Antonio Dos Santos-Pereira1, Elizabeth F Martinez3.   

Abstract

Mucograft(r) is a resorbing porcine matrix composed of type I and type III collagen, used for soft tissue augmentation in guided tissue bony regeneration procedures. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the biological behavior of Mucograft(r) in human gingival fibroblasts, as well as the ability of the matrix to induce production of extracellular matrix. Six resorbing Mucograft(r) matrices (MCG) were cut into 3 x 2 mm rectangles and 5 x 5 mm squares and were placed in 96- and 24-well plates, respectively. The control group (CTRL) consisted of cells plated on polystyrene without the MCG. After one, two, three and seven days, cell proliferation and viability were assessed using the Trypan exclusion method and MTT test, respectively. Type III collagen (COL 3A1) and vimentin (VIM) expression were also evaluated at 10 and 14 days, using Western blotting. Statistical analysis, using ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni test, revealed that human gingival fibroblasts from MCG showed similar results (p>0.05) for proliferation and viability as the cells cultured on CTRL. After 14 days, a significant decrease in COL 3A1 expression (p<0.05) was observed when cultured with the MCG. VIM expression showed no significant difference at any time period (p>0.05). Although no increase in extracellular matrix secretion was observed in this in vitro study, Mucograft(r) presented cellular compatibility, being an option for a scaffold whenever it is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26963203     DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440201300238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Dent J        ISSN: 0103-6440


  5 in total

1.  The efficacy of a porcine collagen matrix in keratinized tissue augmentation: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  C Maiorana; L Pivetti; F Signorino; G B Grossi; A S Herford; M Beretta
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-01-10

Review 2.  Free Gingival Graft versus Mucograft: Histological Evaluation.

Authors:  Zaklina Menceva; Oliver Dimitrovski; Mirjana Popovska; Spiro Spasovski; Vancho Spirov; Gordana Petrushevska
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-03-27

3.  In Vitro Direct and Indirect Cytotoxicity Comparative Analysis of One Pre-Hydrated versus One Dried Acellular Porcine Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Rodolfo Reda; Dario Di Nardo; Gabriele Miccoli; Alessio Zanza; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  In vitro biocompatibility of biohybrid polymers membrane evaluated in human gingival fibroblasts.

Authors:  Bin Guo; Chuhua Tang; Mingguo Wang; Zhongqi Zhao; Hassan A Shokoohi-Tabrizi; Bin Shi; Oleh Andrukhov; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Relationship between the polymorphism in the interleukin 1-β and the treatment time of patients subjected to a modified piezocision technique.

Authors:  Juan Fernando Aristizábal; Héctor Rios; Diego Rey; María Antonia Álvarez; Beatriz Parra; Mario Ortiz
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2020-03-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.