Literature DB >> 26963058

Laparosocopic Appendectomy, Cost-Effectiveness of Three Different Techniques Used to Close the Appendix Stump.

Maciej Matyja, Marcin Strzałka, Kazimierz Rembiasz.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: It is generally agreed that laparoscopic appendectomy is a valuable operative method. The aim of the study was to evaluate cost-effectiveness of three different techniques used to close the appendix stump.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study that compared three groups of patients who were operated on laparoscopically for acute appendicitis in 2013 at our institution. We used an endoscopic clip to close the appendix stump in the first group (n=20), endoscopic stapler was applied in the second group (n=20), and in the third group of patients the appendix base was closed with a laparoscopic suture (n=20). These groups were matched by age, sex and BMI.
RESULTS: The average operative cost was the highest in the second group. Cost of the laparoscopic appendectomy with the application of the endoscopic clip was significantly lower (first group) and comparable to the third group. Observed differences in total hospitalization costs were associated only with the chosen appendix stump closure technique.
CONCLUSIONS: Clip closure of the appendix base is an easy and cost-effective procedure. The laparoscopic suture technique is the cheapest but technically demanding. According to our experience endoscopic stapler may be useful in some cases, although it is the most expensive method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26963058     DOI: 10.1515/pjs-2016-0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol Przegl Chir        ISSN: 0032-373X


  6 in total

1.  Endoloop versus endostapler: what is the best option for appendiceal stump closure in children with complicated appendicitis? Results of a multicentric international survey.

Authors:  Maria Escolino; Francois Becmeur; Amulya Saxena; Holger Till; George W Holcomb; Ciro Esposito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Establishing meaningful benchmarks: the development of a formative feedback tool for advanced laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Katherine M McKendy; Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ghada Enani; Amani Munshi; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy: Hem-o-lok versus Endoloop in stump closure.

Authors:  Andrea Lucchi; Pierluigi Berti; Michele Grassia; Luca Maria Siani; Carlo Gabbianelli; Gianluca Garulli
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-12-24

4.  Incidental appendectomy during robotic laparoscopic prostatectomy-safe and worth to perform?

Authors:  C Hüttenbrink; G Hatiboglu; T Simpfendörfer; J P Radtke; R Becker; D Teber; B Hadaschik; S Pahernik; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Takafumi Machimoto; Yoshio Kadokawa; Toshiyuki Hata; Tatsuo Ito; Shigeru Kato; Daiki Yasukawa; Yuki Aisu; Yusuke Kimura; Maho Sasaki; Yuichi Takamatsu; Taku Kitano; Shigeo Hisamori; Tsunehiro Yoshimura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Partial cecum resection using endostapler in acute complicated appendicitis with appendiceal base necrosis.

Authors:  Serhan Yilmaz; Turgut Donmez; Sina Ferahman; Cevher Akarsu; Sezer Bulut; Halim Ozcevik; Husnu Aydin; Mehmet Karabulut
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 1.195

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.