Literature DB >> 26962727

Four Artemisinin-Based Treatments in African Pregnant Women with Malaria.

Divine Pekyi, Akua A Ampromfi, Halidou Tinto, Maminata Traoré-Coulibaly, Marc C Tahita, Innocent Valéa, Victor Mwapasa, Linda Kalilani-Phiri, Gertrude Kalanda, Mwayiwawo Madanitsa, Raffaella Ravinetto, Theonest Mutabingwa, Prosper Gbekor, Harry Tagbor, Gifty Antwi, Joris Menten, Maaike De Crop, Yves Claeys, Celine Schurmans, Chantal Van Overmeir, Kamala Thriemer, Jean-Pierre Van Geertruyden, Umberto D'Alessandro, Michael Nambozi, Modest Mulenga, Sebastian Hachizovu, Jean-Bertin B Kabuya, Joyce Mulenga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the safety and efficacy of artemisinin combination treatments for malaria in pregnant women is limited, particularly among women who live in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of treatments for malaria in pregnant women in four African countries. A total of 3428 pregnant women in the second or third trimester who had falciparum malaria (at any parasite density and regardless of symptoms) were treated with artemether-lumefantrine, amodiaquine-artesunate, mefloquine-artesunate, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. The primary end points were the polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-adjusted cure rates (i.e., cure of the original infection; new infections during follow-up were not considered to be treatment failures) at day 63 and safety outcomes.
RESULTS: The PCR-adjusted cure rates in the per-protocol analysis were 94.8% in the artemether-lumefantrine group, 98.5% in the amodiaquine-artesunate group, 99.2% in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group, and 96.8% in the mefloquine-artesunate group; the PCR-adjusted cure rates in the intention-to-treat analysis were 94.2%, 96.9%, 98.0%, and 95.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference among the amodiaquine-artesunate group, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group, and the mefloquine-artesunate group. The cure rate in the artemether-lumefantrine group was significantly lower than that in the other three groups, although the absolute difference was within the 5-percentage-point margin for equivalence. The unadjusted cure rates, used as a measure of the post-treatment prophylactic effect, were significantly lower in the artemether-lumefantrine group (52.5%) than in groups that received amodiaquine-artesunate (82.3%), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (86.9%), or mefloquine-artesunate (73.8%). No significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events and in birth outcomes was found among the treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events such as asthenia, poor appetite, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting occurred significantly more frequently in the mefloquine-artesunate group (50.6%) and the amodiaquine-artesunate group (48.5%) than in the dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group (20.6%) and the artemether-lumefantrine group (11.5%) (P<0.001 for comparison among the four groups).
CONCLUSIONS: Artemether-lumefantrine was associated with the fewest adverse effects and with acceptable cure rates but provided the shortest post-treatment prophylaxis, whereas dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine had the best efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. (Funded by the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00852423.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26962727     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  35 in total

1.  Prospective Clinical Trial Assessing Species-Specific Efficacy of Artemether-Lumefantrine for the Treatment of Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale, and Mixed Plasmodium Malaria in Gabon.

Authors:  Mirjam Groger; Luzia Veletzky; Albert Lalremruata; Chiara Cattaneo; Johannes Mischlinger; Rella Zoleko-Manego; Lilian Endamne; Anna Klicpera; Johanna Kim; The Nguyen; Lena Flohr; Jonathan Remppis; Pierre-Blaise Matsiegui; Ayôla A Adegnika; Selidji T Agnandji; Peter G Kremsner; Benjamin Mordmüller; Ghyslain Mombo-Ngoma; Michael Ramharter
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  An overview of malaria in pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Bauserman; Andrea L Conroy; Krysten North; Jackie Patterson; Carl Bose; Steve Meshnick
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2019-03-16       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Participation of Ghanaian pregnant women in an antimalarial drug trial: willingness, experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Joseph Osarfo; Rose O Adjei; Pascal Magnussen; Harry K Tagbor
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.184

4.  Effect of Pregnancy on the Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Efavirenz and Lumefantrine in HIV-Malaria Coinfection.

Authors:  Adebanjo Adegbola; Rana Abutaima; Adeniyi Olagunju; Omotade Ijarotimi; Marco Siccardi; Andrew Owen; Julius Soyinka; Oluseye Bolaji
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A randomized controlled trial of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, artesunate-mefloquine and extended artemether-lumefantrine treatments for malaria in pregnancy on the Thailand-Myanmar border.

Authors:  Makoto Saito; Verena I Carrara; Mary Ellen Gilder; Aung Myat Min; Nay Win Tun; Mupawjay Pimanpanarak; Jacher Viladpai-Nguen; Moo Kho Paw; Warat Haohankhunnatham; Kamonchanok Konghahong; Aung Pyae Phyo; Cindy Chu; Claudia Turner; Sue J Lee; Jureeporn Duanguppama; Mallika Imwong; Germana Bancone; Stephane Proux; Pratap Singhasivanon; Nicholas J White; François Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  The return of chloroquine-susceptible Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Zambia.

Authors:  Sydney Mwanza; Sudhaunshu Joshi; Michael Nambozi; Justin Chileshe; Phidelis Malunga; Jean-Bertin Bukasa Kabuya; Sebastian Hachizovu; Christine Manyando; Modest Mulenga; Miriam Laufer
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 7.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of repeated doses of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for prevention and treatment of malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Gutman; Stephanie Kovacs; Grant Dorsey; Andy Stergachis; Feiko O Ter Kuile
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 8.  Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of artemisinin-based and quinine-based treatments for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in pregnancy: methodological challenges.

Authors:  Makoto Saito; Mary Ellen Gilder; François Nosten; Rose McGready; Philippe J Guérin
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine holds promise as an option for malaria prevention in pregnancy.

Authors:  Jenny Hill; Feiko O Ter Kuile
Journal:  Evid Based Med       Date:  2016-05-20

10.  Scheduled Intermittent Screening with Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Treatment with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine versus Intermittent Preventive Therapy with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for Malaria in Pregnancy in Malawi: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mwayiwawo Madanitsa; Linda Kalilani; Victor Mwapasa; Anna M van Eijk; Carole Khairallah; Doreen Ali; Cheryl Pace; James Smedley; Kyaw-Lay Thwai; Brandt Levitt; Duolao Wang; Arthur Kang'ombe; Brian Faragher; Steve M Taylor; Steve Meshnick; Feiko O Ter Kuile
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.