Literature DB >> 26962715

Bacterial Contamination of the Anesthesia Workplace and Efficiency of Routine Cleaning Procedures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Ulrich Goebel1, Nicole Gebele, Winfried Ebner, Markus Dettenkofer, Hartmut Bürkle, Dieter Hauschke, Sebastian Schulz-Stübner.   

Abstract

In this prospective cohort study, 200 decontamination (cleaning and disinfection) procedures of the anesthesia workplace either by anesthesia nurses or by specially trained housekeeping staff were monitored. Time used by housekeeping staff was shorter (1.2 ± 0.1 vs 2.6 ± 0.2 minutes on average, data are mean ± SEM; P < 0.0001) with less visible marker spots (14.4 ± 0.68 [55%] vs 17.3 ± 0.75 [66.7%] on average, data are mean ± SEM; P = 0.0041), and the bacterial load showed a decrease (≅67%, P < 0.0001) compared with anesthesia nurses. Specially trained housekeeping staff outperformed anesthesia nurses in cleaning the anesthesia workplace. Specific training for anesthesia workplace cleaning is supported by these findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26962715     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  2 in total

1.  [Focus on hygiene: an issue for ultrasound too!].

Authors:  C-A Greim
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Hygiene aspects of multidrug-resistant pathogens in the operating room and intensive care unit].

Authors:  F Schuler; C Lanckohr; M Hendrik Pillukat; R Scherf; A Mellmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.041

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.