Literature DB >> 26962197

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ganciclovir Treatment for Cytomegalovirus Infections Among Immunocompromised Children.

Chris Stockmann1, Catherine M T Sherwin2, Elizabeth D Knackstedt3, Adam L Hersh3, Andrew T Pavia3, Michael G Spigarelli2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 26962197      PMCID: PMC7289335          DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piw008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc        ISSN: 2048-7193            Impact factor:   3.164


× No keyword cloud information.
To the editor — Ganciclovir is a first-line agent for the treatment of human cytomegalovirus (CMV); however, its pharmacokinetics are highly variable, which confounds efforts to consistently achieve therapeutic exposure with standard dosing regimens [ 1 ]. The results of therapeutic drug monitoring in adult solid organ transplant recipients receiving prophylaxis indicated that a 24-hour ganciclovir area under the curve (AUC 24 ) of 40–50 µg·hr per mL was associated with delayed development of CMV viremia [ 2 ]. However, the optimal exposure for the treatment of CMV disease is unknown. Here, we describe our experience using therapeutic drug monitoring in the treatment of CMV with ganciclovir in a child with a history of leaky severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with an AUC 24 target extrapolated from the adult literature. A 4-year-old girl with a history of leaky severe combined immunodeficiency developed CMV viremia that was treated with foscarnet and briefly achieved virologic suppression. However, several weeks later, she was readmitted to the hospital with new symptoms of gastroenteritis and a plasma CMV load of 3.8 log 10 IU/mL. CMV-resistance testing revealed a T813S mutation in the DNA polymerase gene ( UL54 ), which can confer resistance to foscarnet, ganciclovir, and cidofovir [ 3 ]. Foscarnet was discontinued, and intravenous ganciclovir was initiated at 5 mg/kg twice daily. Despite 4 weeks of ganciclovir induction therapy, her CMV load continued to rise. The clinical pharmacology service was consulted, and trough, peak, and 2 random blood samples were obtained for ganciclovir quantitation (Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester, Minnesota). The ganciclovir AUC 24 was calculated to be 32.9 µg·hr per mL, which, on the basis of adult prophylaxis studies [ 2 ], was approximately 65% of the desired exposure. To achieve an estimated AUC 24 of >50 µg·hr per mL, we shortened the ganciclovir dosing interval to 8 hours. The patient's CMV load declined from a peak of 4.2 log 10 IU/mL on day 12 to below the limit of detection (<2.1 log 10 IU/mL) at the time of discharge on day 53. Two weeks after discharge, her ganciclovir dosing interval was increased to 12 hours and then to 24 hours. Secondary prophylaxis was stopped 6 weeks after discharge. Her CMV has remained undetectable for 12 months. Identifying safe and effective ganciclovir dosing regimens for children with CMV is challenging because of the scarcity of published pediatric reports and high between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. We adopted a target AUC 24 of 50 µg·hr per mL, which was derived from a study conducted among 226 adult solid organ transplant recipients receiving prophylaxis who were evaluated 100 days after their transplant [ 2 ]. An AUC 24 of 50 µg·hr per mL was associated with an average incidence of CMV viremia of 1.3%, whereas an AUC 24 of 25 µg·hr per mL was associated with an 8-fold higher risk [ 2 ]. Recently, Padullés Caldés et al [ 4 ] developed a population pharmacokinetic model for adult solid organ transplant recipients receiving ganciclovir for the treatment of CMV disease. The authors used this model and a Bayesian approach to evaluate 20 sampling strategies. The sampling design with the lowest bias and best precision included the collection of 3 samples 0.5–1.5, 4–5, and 6–8 hours after the start of the ganciclovir infusion. These optimal sampling windows may be considered for future studies that investigate pediatric AUC 24 -based therapeutic drug monitoring for ganciclovir. C. S. is supported by the American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences Fellowship.
  4 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics of oral ganciclovir and valganciclovir in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hugh Wiltshire; Carlos V Paya; Mark D Pescovitz; Atul Humar; Edward Dominguez; Kenneth Washburn; Emily Blumberg; Barbara Alexander; Richard Freeman; Nigel Heaton; Klaas P Zuideveld
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Optimal sparse sampling for estimating ganciclovir/valganciclovir AUC in solid organ transplant patients using NONMEN.

Authors:  Ariadna Padullés Caldés; Helena Colom; Anna Caldes; Gema Cerezo; Joan Torras; Josep M Grinyó; Núria Lloberas
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to ganciclovir/valganciclovir: a comprehensive review of putative resistance pathways.

Authors:  Takashi E Komatsu; Andreas Pikis; Lisa K Naeger; Patrick R Harrington
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 5.970

4.  New algorithm for valganciclovir dosing in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Åsberg; A Bjerre; M Neely
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2013-10-23
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Standard ganciclovir dosing results in slow decline of cytomegalovirus viral loads.

Authors:  Anne-Grete Märtson; Marieke G G Sturkenboom; Marjolein Knoester; Tjip S van der Werf; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; William Hope
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.790

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.