BACKGROUND: Preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an important topic in the plastic surgery community. However, there is little consensus regarding appropriate VTE prophylaxis for patients undergoing common body contouring procedures. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the use of two novel oral anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Apixiban) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for postoperative chemical prophylaxis in body contouring plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: A single center retrospective chart review of 1572 patients who underwent body contouring plastic surgery procedures from January 2012 to February 2015 was performed. Major complications associated with chemical prophylaxis were reviewed including hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, acute blood loss anemia requiring transfusions, and thrombotic or hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: Drug-related adverse events occurred in 1.27% (n = 20) of patients. The complications encountered by the 454 patients on LMWH consisted of 0.88% (n = 4) with hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, 0.44% (n = 2) with decreased hemoglobin requiring transfusions, and 0.22% (n = 1) with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The complications encountered by 703 patients on with Rivaroxaban consisted of 1.3% (n = 9) with hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, 0.43% (n = 3) with decreased hemoglobin requiring transfusions, and 0.1% (n = 1) with a DVT and pulmonary embolism. The complications encountered by 415 patients on with Apixaban consisted of 0.48% (n = 2) with a DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Novel oral anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Apixiban) are comparable to LMWH for chemical prophylaxis after body contouring procedures with similar rates of drug-related complications. Further investigation is warranted with more clinical cases in order to recommend the use of this medication for routine postoperative chemical prophylaxis after body contouring procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Therapeutic.
BACKGROUND: Preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an important topic in the plastic surgery community. However, there is little consensus regarding appropriate VTE prophylaxis for patients undergoing common body contouring procedures. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the use of two novel oral anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Apixiban) vs low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for postoperative chemical prophylaxis in body contouring plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: A single center retrospective chart review of 1572 patients who underwent body contouring plastic surgery procedures from January 2012 to February 2015 was performed. Major complications associated with chemical prophylaxis were reviewed including hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, acute blood loss anemia requiring transfusions, and thrombotic or hemorrhagic events. RESULTS: Drug-related adverse events occurred in 1.27% (n = 20) of patients. The complications encountered by the 454 patients on LMWH consisted of 0.88% (n = 4) with hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, 0.44% (n = 2) with decreased hemoglobin requiring transfusions, and 0.22% (n = 1) with a deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The complications encountered by 703 patients on with Rivaroxaban consisted of 1.3% (n = 9) with hematomas requiring surgical evacuation, 0.43% (n = 3) with decreased hemoglobin requiring transfusions, and 0.1% (n = 1) with a DVT and pulmonary embolism. The complications encountered by 415 patients on with Apixaban consisted of 0.48% (n = 2) with a DVT. CONCLUSIONS: Novel oral anticoagulants (Rivaroxaban and Apixiban) are comparable to LMWH for chemical prophylaxis after body contouring procedures with similar rates of drug-related complications. Further investigation is warranted with more clinical cases in order to recommend the use of this medication for routine postoperative chemical prophylaxis after body contouring procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Therapeutic.