T Schoeler1, D Theobald1, J-B Pingault2, D P Farrington3, W G Jennings4, A R Piquero5, J W Coid6, S Bhattacharyya1. 1. Institute of Psychiatry,Psychology & Neuroscience,King's College London,London,UK. 2. Division of Psychology and Language Science,University College London,London,UK. 3. Institute of Criminology,University of Cambridge,Cambridge,UK. 4. College of Behavioral and Community Sciences,University of South Florida,Tampa,FL,USA. 5. School of Economics,Political and Policy Sciences,University of Texas at Dallas,Richardson,TX,USA. 6. Forensic Psychiatry Research Unit,Queens Mary University of London,London,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although the association between cannabis use and violence has been reported in the literature, the precise nature of this relationship, especially the directionality of the association, is unclear. METHOD: Young males from the Cambridge Study of Delinquent Development (n = 411) were followed up between the ages of 8 and 56 years to prospectively investigate the association between cannabis use and violence. A multi-wave (eight assessments, T1-T8) follow-up design was employed that allowed temporal sequencing of the variables of interest and the analysis of violent outcome measures obtained from two sources: (i) criminal records (violent conviction); and (ii) self-reports. A combination of analytic approaches allowing inferences as to the directionality of associations was employed, including multivariate logistic regression analysis, fixed-effects analysis and cross-lagged modelling. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression revealed that compared with never-users, continued exposure to cannabis (use at age 18, 32 and 48 years) was associated with a higher risk of subsequent violent behaviour, as indexed by convictions [odds ratio (OR) 7.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-23.59] or self-reports (OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.37-46.21). This effect persisted after controlling for other putative risk factors for violence. In predicting violence, fixed-effects analysis and cross-lagged modelling further indicated that this effect could not be explained by other unobserved time-invariant factors. Furthermore, these analyses uncovered a bi-directional relationship between cannabis use and violence. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results provide strong indication that cannabis use predicts subsequent violent offending, suggesting a possible causal effect, and provide empirical evidence that may have implications for public policy.
BACKGROUND: Although the association between cannabis use and violence has been reported in the literature, the precise nature of this relationship, especially the directionality of the association, is unclear. METHOD: Young males from the Cambridge Study of Delinquent Development (n = 411) were followed up between the ages of 8 and 56 years to prospectively investigate the association between cannabis use and violence. A multi-wave (eight assessments, T1-T8) follow-up design was employed that allowed temporal sequencing of the variables of interest and the analysis of violent outcome measures obtained from two sources: (i) criminal records (violent conviction); and (ii) self-reports. A combination of analytic approaches allowing inferences as to the directionality of associations was employed, including multivariate logistic regression analysis, fixed-effects analysis and cross-lagged modelling. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression revealed that compared with never-users, continued exposure to cannabis (use at age 18, 32 and 48 years) was associated with a higher risk of subsequent violent behaviour, as indexed by convictions [odds ratio (OR) 7.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-23.59] or self-reports (OR 8.9, 95% CI 2.37-46.21). This effect persisted after controlling for other putative risk factors for violence. In predicting violence, fixed-effects analysis and cross-lagged modelling further indicated that this effect could not be explained by other unobserved time-invariant factors. Furthermore, these analyses uncovered a bi-directional relationship between cannabis use and violence. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these results provide strong indication that cannabis use predicts subsequent violent offending, suggesting a possible causal effect, and provide empirical evidence that may have implications for public policy.
Authors: Patrick M Carter; Charles A Mouch; Jason E Goldstick; Maureen A Walton; Marc A Zimmerman; Ken Resnicow; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Patrick M Carter; James A Cranford; Anne Buu; Maureen A Walton; Marc A Zimmerman; Jason Goldstick; Quyen Ngo; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Janitza L Montalvo-Ortiz; Hang Zhou; Ivana D'Andrea; Luc Maroteaux; Adriana Lori; Alicia Smith; Kerry J Ressler; Yaira Z Nuñez; Lindsay A Farrer; Hongyu Zhao; Henry R Kranzler; Joel Gelernter Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: R James R Blair; Sahil Bajaj; Noah Sherer; Johannah Bashford-Largo; Ru Zhang; Joseph Aloi; Chris Hammond; Jennie Lukoff; Amanda Schwartz; Jaimie Elowsky; Patrick Tyler; Francesca M Filbey; Matthew Dobbertin; Karina S Blair Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2020-12-19